GEMMA DEVELOPER AGENT
SAVED EVIDENCE
← 31B real rollouts · 480 (exact stack, 32 lanes, 13-Nov)
ROLLOUT 5 · samuelcolvin/pydantic

samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177

Solved
454 stotal time
14tool calls
14model calls
6,392tokens generated
124,885prompt tokens read

Agent exceeded session timeout (7.5 min)

Turn by turn

Token shading: p ≥ 0.9 0.5 – 0.9 0.2 – 0.5 below 0.2. Hover a token for its id and probability.

System instructions 4,822 characters
You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`.
Your sole objective is to produce a minimal, root-cause source patch that passes every hidden fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass regression test on the first grading run.

## Critical Environment & Grader Rules
1. **Air-Gapped Sandbox & Available CLI Tools**: No network access. Never run `pip`, `uv`, `conda`, or `git fetch`. Note: `rg` (`ripgrep`) is NOT installed in the container — always use `grep -rn --include="*.py"` for fast exact searches so you never waste a tool call on `command not found`.
2. **Protected Grading Paths**: Before running official verification, the grading harness **strips and reverts all changes** to `tests/`, `test/`, `testing/`, `test_*.py`, `*_test.py`, `conftest.py`, `pyproject.toml`, `setup.cfg`, `pytest.ini`, and `tox.ini`. Every part of your fix MUST reside in non-test production source files.
3. **Untracked File Trap (`git add -N .`)**: `submit_patch` stages ALL untracked files inside `/workspace`! Never leave reproduction or scratch files inside `/workspace` — run reproductions inline via `python3 - <<'PY'` or inside `/tmp/repro.py` in a single `run_command`.
4. **Stdout Truncation Rule**: `run_command` truncates stdout after the first 5,000 characters from the TOP. Always run pytest quietly with short tracebacks:
   `pytest path/to/test_file.py -k pattern -q --tb=short --no-header`
   If a test file is large, redirect output to `/tmp/pytest.log` and inspect `tail -n 80 /tmp/pytest.log` so failure tracebacks at the bottom are never cut off.
5. **Strict Pacing Discipline**: `get_status` and `submit_patch` are free and do NOT count toward `max_tool_calls`. Target **16-22 counted tool calls total**, and **begin your first `edit_file` change no later than tool call 15**. Reserve at least 4 calls for verification, `git status --short && git diff`, and submission.

## Execution Protocol

### Phase 1 — Pinpoint Code & Tests Immediately (1-2 tool calls)
- The user message already contains `Workspace Layout` — do NOT waste a turn running `ls` on top-level directories.
- Run a single compound `run_command` with `grep -rn --include="*.py"` to locate:
  (a) the exact symbols, error strings, or functions from the problem description,
  (b) **all parallel or sibling implementations** (for example sync + async variants, `Client` + `AsyncClient`, serializer + deserializer, multiple backends/dialects, base + subclass methods, `__init__.py` / `__all__` exports), and
  (c) the closest existing unit test files under `tests/`.

### Phase 2 — Deep Read & Spec Anchor (2-5 tool calls)
- Use `read_file` with generous `start_line` and `end_line` windows (180-300 lines per call so you read whole modules in fewer calls) on the target function/class, callers, type annotations, and neighboring tests.
- Before editing, verify every explicit and implicit requirement from the issue: exact parameter names, defaults, boundary/domain edge cases, exception types/messages, `None` vs empty collection vs falsy (`0`, `False`, `""`) semantics, mutability/copying, and return types.

### Phase 3 — Reproduce Bug in One Call (1 tool call)
- Run ONE concise command (`python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` or targeted `pytest ... -q --tb=short --no-header`) via `run_command` to observe the exact pre-fix failure. Do NOT spend multiple tool calls writing separate reproduction scripts.

### Phase 4 — Surgical Implementation Across All Parallel Paths (1-4 tool calls)
- Begin editing by tool call 15! Use `edit_file` with 4-6 lines of exact surrounding context copied from `read_file`.
- Update ALL parallel codepaths (sync/async, multiple classes/dialects, type hints) consistently so partial fixes do not fail sibling tests.
- **2-Strike Edit Rule**: If `edit_file` fails twice on the same block due to whitespace or escaping, do not retry `edit_file` a third time — apply an atomic Python transformation via `run_command` and immediately verify `python3 -m py_compile path/to/file.py`.

### Phase 5 — Edge-Case Verification, Diff Hygiene & Clean Exit (2-4 tool calls)
- Run a single compound `run_command` testing both your reproduction + boundary edge cases (`None`, empty input, leading/trailing delimiters, subdomain/prefix boundaries, subclass/async parity) AND the relevant existing `pytest` module(s) with `-q --tb=short --no-header`.
- Run `git status --short && git diff` via `run_command`. Confirm:
  - ZERO untracked (`??`) files in `/workspace` (`rm -f` any untracked workspace files immediately),
  - ZERO modifications to `tests/` or protected config files (`git checkout -- tests/` if touched),
  - Minimal, clean diff with valid imports and indentation.
- Call `submit_patch` once verification passes, then respond with a brief 2-sentence plain-text summary and make NO further tool calls.
Task prompt 5,779 characters
You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository samuelcolvin/pydantic.

Problem Statement:
"extra" config not respected for TypedDicts in functions
### Checks

* [x] I added a descriptive title to this issue
* [x] I have searched (google, github) for similar issues and couldn't find anything
* [x] I have read and followed [the docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and still think this is a bug

<!-- Sorry to sound so draconian, but every second saved replying to issues is time spend improving pydantic :-) -->

# Bug

Output of `python -c "import pydantic.utils; print(pydantic.utils.version_info())"`:
```
             pydantic version: 1.8.2
            pydantic compiled: False
                 install path: /home/msharma216/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pydantic
               python version: 3.8.0 (default, Feb 25 2021, 22:10:10)  [GCC 8.4.0]
                     platform: Linux-4.4.0-19041-Microsoft-x86_64-with-glibc2.27
     optional deps. installed: ['typing-extensions']

```
<!-- or if you're using pydantic prior to v1.3, manually include: OS, python version and pydantic version -->

<!-- Please read the [docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and search through issues to
confirm your bug hasn't already been reported. -->

<!-- Where possible please include a self-contained code snippet describing your bug: -->

When trying to use the `validate_arguments` decorator, I face the issue of getting validation errors for an extra attribute for a TypedDict as below:

```py
from typing_extensions import TypedDict

from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra


class TypedTest(TypedDict):
    y: str


@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
    pass


test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})

```

Output:
```
pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for Test
other -> z
  extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)
```

Expected: No errors

Anything I have missed that would let this validation pass for extra attributes in the TypedDict?

Thanks very much!

## Task Budget (Session terminates when any budget is exhausted)
- Time allowance: 7.5 minutes
- Tool calls allowance: 30 calls
- Max loop iterations: 40 turns

## Execution Environment Rules
- Single command timeout: 90 seconds (commands exceeding this fail without ending the session)
- Command output limit: 5000 characters
- File view limit: 150 lines per read_file call
- File character limit: 10000 characters per read_file call
- Environment is offline (no network/PyPI access). All repository and test dependencies are ALREADY pre-installed. Do NOT attempt to run pip install or download packages.

## Instructions:
0. All source code is under `/workspace`. Do NOT search outside `/workspace` (e.g. `/usr/`, `/wheels/`, system site-packages). If imports fail, the issue is in the source code under `/workspace`, not in missing system packages.
1. Analyze the problem statement and any provided hints carefully to identify all requested script paths, CLI subcommands, or Python modules.
2. Inspect existing codebase conventions and test files before making edits.
3. Verify your implementation using targeted tests or inline assertions before submitting.
4. Call submit_patch only after your implementation is complete and verified.
5. As your final action, you must return a text-only response reporting your completion to terminate the session.
## Workspace Layout
The repository is located at `/workspace`. Here is the directory tree (up to 3 levels):
```
./HISTORY.md
./LICENSE
./MANIFEST.in
./Makefile
./README.md
./benchmarks
./changes
./changes/1807-xavier.md
./changes/1831-fnep.md
./changes/1895-PrettyWood.md
./changes/1983-vgerak.md
./changes/2060-uriyyo.md
./changes/2341-alecgerona.md
./changes/2375-maximberg.md
./changes/2425-Kludex.md
./changes/2447-MihanixA.md
./changes/2463-nuno-andre.md
./changes/2465-daviskirk.md
./changes/2489-koxudaxi.md
./changes/2512-sbv-csis.md
./changes/2515-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2517-peterroelants.md
./changes/2519-daviskirk.md
./changes/2524-cwe5590.md
./changes/2567-postgres-asyncpg.md
./changes/2572-paxcodes.md
./changes/2580-samuelcolvin.md
./changes/2707-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2712-RatulMaharaj.md
./changes/2718-nuno-andre.md
./changes/2719-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2724-shahriyarr.md
./changes/2733-krisaoe.md
./changes/2743-uriyyo.md
./changes/2748-uriyyo.md
./changes/2753-uriyyo.md
./changes/2760-jameysharp.md
./changes/2794-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2810-sergejkozin.md
./changes/2855-paxcodes.md
./changes/2856-paxcodes.md
./changes/2860-geekingfrog.md
./changes/2885-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2908-jrwalk.md
./changes/2913-gbdlin.md
./changes/2929-samuelcolvin.md
./changes/2936-cbartz.md
./changes/2989-hmvp.md
./changes/3008-PrettyWood.md
./changes/3018-JacobHayes.md
./changes/3038-matthewhughes934.md
./changes/3043-zulrang.md
./changes/3062-PrettyWood.md
./changes/3135-PrettyWood.md
./changes/660-daviskirk.md
./changes/README.md
./changes/make_history.py
./docs
./mkdocs.yml
./pydantic
./pydantic/__init__.py
./pydantic/_hypothesis_plugin.py
./pydantic/annotated_types.py
./pydantic/class_validators.py
./pydantic/color.py
./pydantic/config.py
./pydantic/dataclasses.py
./pydantic/datetime_parse.py
./pydantic/decorator.py
./pydantic/env_settings.py
./pydantic/error_wrappers.py
./pydantic/errors.py
./pydantic/fields.py
./pydantic/generics.py
./pydantic/json.py
./pydantic/main.py
./pydantic/mypy.py
./pydantic/networks.py
./pydantic/parse.py
./pydantic/py.typed
./pydantic/schema.py
./pydantic/tools.py
./pydantic/types.py
./pydantic/typing.py
./pydantic/utils.py
./pydantic/validators.py
./pydantic/version.py
./requirements.txt
./setup.cfg
./setup.py
./tests
```
Turn 1at 19 s318 tokens out4,043 prompt tokens
The user is reporting a bug where `Extra.allow` config in `validate_arguments` is not respected when the argument is a `TypedDict`.

Example provided:
```python
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra

class TypedTest(TypedDict):
    y: str

@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
    pass

test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
```
Expectation: No errors.
Actual result: `pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for Test other -> z extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)`

I need to investigate how `validate_arguments` handles `TypedDict` and how it applies the `extra` config.

First, I will reproduce the bug.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom typing_extensions import TypedDict\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra\n\nclass TypedTest(TypedDict):\n    y: str\n\n@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})\ndef test(other: TypedTest):\n    pass\n\ntry:\n    test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n    print(\"Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(e)\nPY\n"
}
Result of run_command 156 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "1 validation error for Test\nother -> z\n  extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 318 tokens · stopped: STOP
<|channel>thought The user is reporting a bug where `Extra.allow` config in `validate_arguments` is not respected when the argument is a `TypedDict`. Example provided: ```python from typing_extensions import TypedDict from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra class TypedTest(TypedDict): y: str @validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow}) def test(other: TypedTest): pass test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}) ``` Expectation: No errors. Actual result: `pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for Test other -> z extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)` I need to investigate how `validate_arguments` handles `TypedDict` and how it applies the `extra` config. First, I will reproduce the bug.<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY' from typing_extensions import TypedDict from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra class TypedTest(TypedDict): y: str @validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow}) def test(other: TypedTest): pass try: test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}) print("Success") except Exception as e: print(e) PY <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 2at 27 s164 tokens out4,427 prompt tokens
The bug is reproduced. Now I need to find where `validate_arguments` and `TypedDict` validation are handled.

`validate_arguments` is likely in `pydantic/decorator.py` or `pydantic/main.py`.
`TypedDict` handling might be in `pydantic/typing.py` or `pydantic/main.py`.

Let's search for `validate_arguments` and `TypedDict`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "grep -rn --include=\"*.py\" \"validate_arguments\" pydantic/ | head -n 20\ngrep -rn --include=\"*.py\" \"TypedDict\" pydantic/ | head -n 20\n"
}
Result of run_command 2,659 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "pydantic/fields.py:407:                    # check also `Required` because of `validate_arguments` that sets `...` as default value\npydantic/decorator.py:11:__all__ = ('validate_arguments',)\npydantic/decorator.py:21:def validate_arguments(func: None = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Callable[['AnyCallableT'], 'AnyCallableT']:\npydantic/decorator.py:26:def validate_arguments(func: 'AnyCallableT') -> 'AnyCallableT':\npydantic/decorator.py:30:def validate_arguments(func: Optional['AnyCallableT'] = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Any:\npydantic/decorator.py:69:                f'are not permitted as argument names when using the \"{validate_arguments.__name__}\" decorator'\npydantic/decorator.py:218:                '@validate_arguments is not yet supported, please remove.'\npydantic/__init__.py:6:from .decorator import validate_arguments\npydantic/__init__.py:35:    'validate_arguments',\npydantic/error_wrappers.py:8:    from typing_extensions import TypedDict\npydantic/error_wrappers.py:16:    class _ErrorDictRequired(TypedDict):\npydantic/networks.py:34:    from typing_extensions import TypedDict\npydantic/networks.py:42:    class Parts(TypedDict, total=False):\npydantic/annotated_types.py:7:    from typing_extensions import TypedDict\npydantic/annotated_types.py:11:    # Mypy bug: `Type[TypedDict]` is resolved as `Any` https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/11030\npydantic/annotated_types.py:12:    typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'],  # type: ignore[valid-type]\npydantic/annotated_types.py:16:    Create a `BaseModel` based on the fields of a `TypedDict`.\npydantic/annotated_types.py:17:    Since `typing.TypedDict` in Python 3.8 does not store runtime information about optional keys,\npydantic/annotated_types.py:22:    # Best case scenario: with python 3.9+ or when `TypedDict` is imported from `typing_extensions`\npydantic/annotated_types.py:25:            'You should use `typing_extensions.TypedDict` instead of `typing.TypedDict`. '\npydantic/validators.py:46:    from typing_extensions import Literal, TypedDict\npydantic/validators.py:581:    typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig']  # type: ignore[valid-type]\npydantic/validators.py:585:    TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(\npydantic/validators.py:590:    typeddict_cls.__pydantic_model__ = TypedDictModel  # type: ignore[attr-defined]\npydantic/validators.py:592:    def typeddict_validator(values: 'TypedDict') -> Dict[str, Any]:  # type: ignore[valid-type]\npydantic/validators.py:593:        return TypedDictModel.parse_obj(values).dict(exclude_unset=True)\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 164 tokens · stopped: STOP
The bug is reproduced. Now I need to find where `validate_arguments` and `TypedDict` validation are handled. `validate_arguments` is likely in `pydantic/decorator.py` or `pydantic/main.py`. `TypedDict` handling might be in `pydantic/typing.py` or `pydantic/main.py`. Let's search for `validate_arguments` and `TypedDict`. <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn --include="*.py" "validate_arguments" pydantic/ | head -n 20 grep -rn --include="*.py" "TypedDict" pydantic/ | head -n 20 <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 3at 39 s196 tokens out5,441 prompt tokens
`pydantic/decorator.py` contains `validate_arguments`.
`pydantic/validators.py` seems to have `typeddict_validator` which uses `create_model_from_typeddict` and `parse_obj`.

Let's examine `pydantic/decorator.py` first to see how it uses `config`.
Then I'll look at `pydantic/validators.py` and `create_model_from_typeddict`.

Wait, `create_model_from_typeddict` is mentioned but I don't see where it is defined in the `grep` output. Let me check `pydantic/main.py` or `pydantic/typing.py`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "grep -rn --include=\"*.py\" \"create_model_from_typeddict\" pydantic/\n"
}
Result of run_command 463 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "pydantic/annotated_types.py:10:def create_model_from_typeddict(\npydantic/__init__.py:3:from .annotated_types import create_model_from_namedtuple, create_model_from_typeddict\npydantic/__init__.py:25:    'create_model_from_typeddict',\npydantic/validators.py:583:    from .annotated_types import create_model_from_typeddict\npydantic/validators.py:585:    TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 196 tokens · stopped: STOP
`pydantic/decorator.py` contains `validate_arguments`. `pydantic/validators.py` seems to have `typeddict_validator` which uses `create_model_from_typeddict` and `parse_obj`. Let's examine `pydantic/decorator.py` first to see how it uses `config`. Then I'll look at `pydantic/validators.py` and `create_model_from_typeddict`. Wait, `create_model_from_typeddict` is mentioned but I don't see where it is defined in the `grep` output. Let me check `pydantic/main.py` or `pydantic/typing.py`. <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn --include="*.py" "create_model_from_typeddict" pydantic/ <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 4at 43 s73 tokens out5,812 prompt tokens
Okay, `create_model_from_typeddict` is in `pydantic/annotated_types.py`.

Let's read `pydantic/decorator.py` to see how `validate_arguments` works.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py"
}
Result of read_file 5,804 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
  "content": "from functools import wraps\nfrom typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Callable, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional, Tuple, Type, TypeVar, Union, overload\n\nfrom . import validator\nfrom .config import Extra\nfrom .errors import ConfigError\nfrom .main import BaseModel, create_model\nfrom .typing import get_all_type_hints\nfrom .utils import to_camel\n\n__all__ = ('validate_arguments',)\n\nif TYPE_CHECKING:\n    from .typing import AnyCallable\n\n    AnyCallableT = TypeVar('AnyCallableT', bound=AnyCallable)\n    ConfigType = Union[None, Type[Any], Dict[str, Any]]\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: None = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Callable[['AnyCallableT'], 'AnyCallableT']:\n    ...\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: 'AnyCallableT') -> 'AnyCallableT':\n    ...\n\n\ndef validate_arguments(func: Optional['AnyCallableT'] = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Any:\n    \"\"\"\n    Decorator to validate the arguments passed to a function.\n    \"\"\"\n\n    def validate(_func: 'AnyCallable') -> 'AnyCallable':\n        vd = ValidatedFunction(_func, config)\n\n        @wraps(_func)\n        def wrapper_function(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:\n            return vd.call(*args, **kwargs)\n\n        wrapper_function.vd = vd  # type: ignore\n        wrapper_function.validate = vd.init_model_instance  # type: ignore\n        wrapper_function.raw_function = vd.raw_function  # type: ignore\n        wrapper_function.model = vd.model  # type: ignore\n        return wrapper_function\n\n    if func:\n        return validate(func)\n    else:\n        return validate\n\n\nALT_V_ARGS = 'v__args'\nALT_V_KWARGS = 'v__kwargs'\nV_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME = 'v__positional_only'\nV_DUPLICATE_KWARGS = 'v__duplicate_kwargs'\n\n\nclass ValidatedFunction:\n    def __init__(self, function: 'AnyCallableT', config: 'ConfigType'):  # noqa C901\n        from inspect import Parameter, signature\n\n        parameters: Mapping[str, Parameter] = signature(function).parameters\n\n        if parameters.keys() & {ALT_V_ARGS, ALT_V_KWARGS, V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME, V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS}:\n            raise ConfigError(\n                f'\"{ALT_V_ARGS}\", \"{ALT_V_KWARGS}\", \"{V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME}\" and \"{V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS}\" '\n                f'are not permitted as argument names when using the \"{validate_arguments.__name__}\" decorator'\n            )\n\n        self.raw_function = function\n        self.arg_mapping: Dict[int, str] = {}\n        self.positional_only_args = set()\n        self.v_args_name = 'args'\n        self.v_kwargs_name = 'kwargs'\n\n        type_hints = get_all_type_hints(function)\n        takes_args = False\n        takes_kwargs = False\n        fields: Dict[str, Tuple[Any, Any]] = {}\n        for i, (name, p) in enumerate(parameters.items()):\n            if p.annotation is p.empty:\n                annotation = Any\n            else:\n                annotation = type_hints[name]\n\n            default = ... if p.default is p.empty else p.default\n            if p.kind == Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY:\n                self.arg_mapping[i] = name\n                fields[name] = annotation, default\n                fields[V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME] = List[str], None\n                self.positional_only_args.add(name)\n            elif p.kind == Parameter.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD:\n                self.arg_mapping[i] = name\n                fields[name] = annotation, default\n                fields[V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS] = List[str], None\n            elif p.kind == Parameter.KEYWORD_ONLY:\n                fields[name] = annotation, default\n            elif p.kind == Parameter.VAR_POSITIONAL:\n                self.v_args_name = name\n                fields[name] = Tuple[annotation, ...], None\n                takes_args = True\n            else:\n                assert p.kind == Parameter.VAR_KEYWORD, p.kind\n                self.v_kwargs_name = name\n                fields[name] = Dict[str, annotation], None  # type: ignore\n                takes_kwargs = True\n\n        # these checks avoid a clash between \"args\" and a field with that name\n        if not takes_args and self.v_args_name in fields:\n            self.v_args_name = ALT_V_ARGS\n\n        # same with \"kwargs\"\n        if not takes_kwargs and self.v_kwargs_name in fields:\n            self.v_kwargs_name = ALT_V_KWARGS\n\n        if not takes_args:\n            # we add the field so validation below can raise the correct exception\n            fields[self.v_args_name] = List[Any], None\n\n        if not takes_kwargs:\n            # same with kwargs\n            fields[self.v_kwargs_name] = Dict[Any, Any], None\n\n        self.create_model(fields, takes_args, takes_kwargs, config)\n\n    def init_model_instance(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> BaseModel:\n        values = self.build_values(args, kwargs)\n        return self.model(**values)\n\n    def call(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:\n        m = self.init_model_instance(*args, **kwargs)\n        return self.execute(m)\n\n    def build_values(self, args: Tuple[Any, ...], kwargs: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:\n        values: Dict[str, Any] = {}\n        if args:\n            arg_iter = enumerate(args)\n            while True:\n                try:\n                    i, a = next(arg_iter)\n                except StopIteration:\n                    break\n                arg_name = self.arg_mapping.get(i)\n                if arg_name is not None:\n                    values[arg_name] = a\n                else:\n                    values[self.v_args_name] = [a] + [a for _, a in arg_iter]\n                    break",
  "start_line": 1,
  "end_line": 150,
  "total_lines": 259,
  "is_truncated": true
}
Generated tokens 73 tokens · stopped: STOP
Okay, `create_model_from_typeddict` is in `pydantic/annotated_types.py`. Let's read `pydantic/decorator.py` to see how `validate_arguments` works. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/decorator.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 5at 48 s52 tokens out7,616 prompt tokens
I need to see the rest of `ValidatedFunction` and specifically its `create_model` method.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
  "start_line": 151
}
Result of read_file 4,774 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
  "content": "\n        var_kwargs = {}\n        wrong_positional_args = []\n        duplicate_kwargs = []\n        non_var_fields = set(self.model.__fields__) - {self.v_args_name, self.v_kwargs_name}\n        for k, v in kwargs.items():\n            if k in non_var_fields:\n                if k in self.positional_only_args:\n                    wrong_positional_args.append(k)\n                if k in values:\n                    duplicate_kwargs.append(k)\n                values[k] = v\n            else:\n                var_kwargs[k] = v\n\n        if var_kwargs:\n            values[self.v_kwargs_name] = var_kwargs\n        if wrong_positional_args:\n            values[V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME] = wrong_positional_args\n        if duplicate_kwargs:\n            values[V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS] = duplicate_kwargs\n        return values\n\n    def execute(self, m: BaseModel) -> Any:\n        d = {k: v for k, v in m._iter() if k in m.__fields_set__ or m.__fields__[k].default_factory}\n        var_kwargs = d.pop(self.v_kwargs_name, {})\n\n        if self.v_args_name in d:\n            args_: List[Any] = []\n            in_kwargs = False\n            kwargs = {}\n            for name, value in d.items():\n                if in_kwargs:\n                    kwargs[name] = value\n                elif name == self.v_args_name:\n                    args_ += value\n                    in_kwargs = True\n                else:\n                    args_.append(value)\n            return self.raw_function(*args_, **kwargs, **var_kwargs)\n        elif self.positional_only_args:\n            args_ = []\n            kwargs = {}\n            for name, value in d.items():\n                if name in self.positional_only_args:\n                    args_.append(value)\n                else:\n                    kwargs[name] = value\n            return self.raw_function(*args_, **kwargs, **var_kwargs)\n        else:\n            return self.raw_function(**d, **var_kwargs)\n\n    def create_model(self, fields: Dict[str, Any], takes_args: bool, takes_kwargs: bool, config: 'ConfigType') -> None:\n        pos_args = len(self.arg_mapping)\n\n        class CustomConfig:\n            pass\n\n        if not TYPE_CHECKING:  # pragma: no branch\n            if isinstance(config, dict):\n                CustomConfig = type('Config', (), config)  # noqa: F811\n            elif config is not None:\n                CustomConfig = config  # noqa: F811\n\n        if hasattr(CustomConfig, 'fields') or hasattr(CustomConfig, 'alias_generator'):\n            raise ConfigError(\n                'Setting the \"fields\" and \"alias_generator\" property on custom Config for '\n                '@validate_arguments is not yet supported, please remove.'\n            )\n\n        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):\n            @validator(self.v_args_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n            def check_args(cls, v: Optional[List[Any]]) -> Optional[List[Any]]:\n                if takes_args or v is None:\n                    return v\n\n                raise TypeError(f'{pos_args} positional arguments expected but {pos_args + len(v)} given')\n\n            @validator(self.v_kwargs_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n            def check_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:\n                if takes_kwargs or v is None:\n                    return v\n\n                plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'\n                keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v.keys()))\n                raise TypeError(f'unexpected keyword argument{plural}: {keys}')\n\n            @validator(V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n            def check_positional_only(cls, v: Optional[List[str]]) -> None:\n                if v is None:\n                    return\n\n                plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'\n                keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v))\n                raise TypeError(f'positional-only argument{plural} passed as keyword argument{plural}: {keys}')\n\n            @validator(V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n            def check_duplicate_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[List[str]]) -> None:\n                if v is None:\n                    return\n\n                plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'\n                keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v))\n                raise TypeError(f'multiple values for argument{plural}: {keys}')\n\n            class Config(CustomConfig):\n                extra = Extra.forbid\n\n        self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)",
  "start_line": 151,
  "end_line": 259,
  "total_lines": 259,
  "is_truncated": false
}
Generated tokens 52 tokens · stopped: STOP
I need to see the rest of `ValidatedFunction` and specifically its `create_model` method. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/decorator.py<|"|>,start_line:151}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 6at 75 s437 tokens out9,019 prompt tokens
In `create_model`:
```python
        class Config(CustomConfig):
            extra = Extra.forbid
```
Wait, this `Config` class is being defined inside `DecoratorBaseModel` method `create_model`. Wait, no, it's inside `create_model` but it's intended to be the `Config` for `DecoratorBaseModel`.

Wait, `DecoratorBaseModel` is a class. Inside it, `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid`.
Since `Pydantic` models use a `Config` inner class for configuration, this is how `DecoratorBaseModel` is configured.
`CustomConfig` is derived from the `config` argument of `validate_arguments`.

If `config={'extra': Extra.allow}` is passed, `CustomConfig` will have `extra = Extra.allow`.
But then `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid` will override it to `Extra.forbid`.

Wait, but the issue is about a `TypedDict` as an argument.
In the example:
```python
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
    y: str

@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
    pass
```
The function `test` is decorated. `validate_arguments` creates a model where `other` is a field of type `TypedTest`.
When `test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})` is called, the `DecoratorBaseModel` validates the arguments.
The `other` field is of type `TypedTest`.

Pydantic's validation of `TypedDict` is handled by `typeddict_validator` in `pydantic/validators.py`.

Let's look at `pydantic/validators.py`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "pydantic/validators.py"
}
Result of read_file 3,978 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
  "content": "import re\nfrom collections import OrderedDict, deque\nfrom collections.abc import Hashable as CollectionsHashable\nfrom datetime import date, datetime, time, timedelta\nfrom decimal import Decimal, DecimalException\nfrom enum import Enum, IntEnum\nfrom ipaddress import IPv4Address, IPv4Interface, IPv4Network, IPv6Address, IPv6Interface, IPv6Network\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom typing import (\n    TYPE_CHECKING,\n    Any,\n    Callable,\n    Deque,\n    Dict,\n    FrozenSet,\n    Generator,\n    Hashable,\n    List,\n    NamedTuple,\n    Pattern,\n    Set,\n    Tuple,\n    Type,\n    TypeVar,\n    Union,\n)\nfrom uuid import UUID\n\nfrom . import errors\nfrom .datetime_parse import parse_date, parse_datetime, parse_duration, parse_time\nfrom .typing import (\n    AnyCallable,\n    ForwardRef,\n    all_literal_values,\n    display_as_type,\n    get_class,\n    is_callable_type,\n    is_literal_type,\n    is_namedtuple,\n    is_none_type,\n    is_typeddict,\n)\nfrom .utils import almost_equal_floats, lenient_issubclass, sequence_like\n\nif TYPE_CHECKING:\n    from typing_extensions import Literal, TypedDict\n\n    from .config import BaseConfig\n    from .fields import ModelField\n    from .types import ConstrainedDecimal, ConstrainedFloat, ConstrainedInt\n\n    ConstrainedNumber = Union[ConstrainedDecimal, ConstrainedFloat, ConstrainedInt]\n    AnyOrderedDict = OrderedDict[Any, Any]\n    Number = Union[int, float, Decimal]\n    StrBytes = Union[str, bytes]\n\n\ndef str_validator(v: Any) -> Union[str]:\n    if isinstance(v, str):\n        if isinstance(v, Enum):\n            return v.value\n        else:\n            return v\n    elif isinstance(v, (float, int, Decimal)):\n        # is there anything else we want to add here? If you think so, create an issue.\n        return str(v)\n    elif isinstance(v, (bytes, bytearray)):\n        return v.decode()\n    else:\n        raise errors.StrError()\n\n\ndef strict_str_validator(v: Any) -> Union[str]:\n    if isinstance(v, str) and not isinstance(v, Enum):\n        return v\n    raise errors.StrError()\n\n\ndef bytes_validator(v: Any) -> bytes:\n    if isinstance(v, bytes):\n        return v\n    elif isinstance(v, bytearray):\n        return bytes(v)\n    elif isinstance(v, str):\n        return v.encode()\n    elif isinstance(v, (float, int, Decimal)):\n        return str(v).encode()\n    else:\n        raise errors.BytesError()\n\n\ndef strict_bytes_validator(v: Any) -> Union[bytes]:\n    if isinstance(v, bytes):\n        return v\n    elif isinstance(v, bytearray):\n        return bytes(v)\n    else:\n        raise errors.BytesError()\n\n\nBOOL_FALSE = {0, '0', 'off', 'f', 'false', 'n', 'no'}\nBOOL_TRUE = {1, '1', 'on', 't', 'true', 'y', 'yes'}\n\n\ndef bool_validator(v: Any) -> bool:\n    if v is True or v is False:\n        return v\n    if isinstance(v, bytes):\n        v = v.decode()\n    if isinstance(v, str):\n        v = v.lower()\n    try:\n        if v in BOOL_TRUE:\n            return True\n        if v in BOOL_FALSE:\n            return False\n    except TypeError:\n        raise errors.BoolError()\n    raise errors.BoolError()\n\n\ndef int_validator(v: Any) -> int:\n    if isinstance(v, int) and not (v is True or v is False):\n        return v\n\n    try:\n        return int(v)\n    except (TypeError, ValueError):\n        raise errors.IntegerError()\n\n\ndef strict_int_validator(v: Any) -> int:\n    if isinstance(v, int) and not (v is True or v is False):\n        return v\n    raise errors.IntegerError()\n\n\ndef float_validator(v: Any) -> float:\n    if isinstance(v, float):\n        return v\n\n    try:\n        return float(v)\n    except (TypeError, ValueError):\n        raise errors.FloatError()\n\n\ndef strict_float_validator(v: Any) -> float:\n    if isinstance(v, float):\n        return v",
  "start_line": 1,
  "end_line": 150,
  "total_lines": 723,
  "is_truncated": true
}
Generated tokens 437 tokens · stopped: STOP
In `create_model`: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid ``` Wait, this `Config` class is being defined inside `DecoratorBaseModel` method `create_model`. Wait, no, it's inside `create_model` but it's intended to be the `Config` for `DecoratorBaseModel`. Wait, `DecoratorBaseModel` is a class. Inside it, `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid`. Since `Pydantic` models use a `Config` inner class for configuration, this is how `DecoratorBaseModel` is configured. `CustomConfig` is derived from the `config` argument of `validate_arguments`. If `config={'extra': Extra.allow}` is passed, `CustomConfig` will have `extra = Extra.allow`. But then `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid` will override it to `Extra.forbid`. Wait, but the issue is about a `TypedDict` as an argument. In the example: ```python class TypedTest(TypedDict): y: str @validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow}) def test(other: TypedTest): pass ``` The function `test` is decorated. `validate_arguments` creates a model where `other` is a field of type `TypedTest`. When `test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})` is called, the `DecoratorBaseModel` validates the arguments. The `other` field is of type `TypedTest`. Pydantic's validation of `TypedDict` is handled by `typeddict_validator` in `pydantic/validators.py`. Let's look at `pydantic/validators.py`. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/validators.py<|"|>,start_line=570,end_line=600}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 7at 78 s64 tokens out10,665 prompt tokens
I need to see `typeddict_validator` and where it's used. It was at the end of `pydantic/validators.py`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
  "start_line'": 560
}
Result of read_file 3,978 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
  "content": "import re\nfrom collections import OrderedDict, deque\nfrom collections.abc import Hashable as CollectionsHashable\nfrom datetime import date, datetime, time, timedelta\nfrom decimal import Decimal, DecimalException\nfrom enum import Enum, IntEnum\nfrom ipaddress import IPv4Address, IPv4Interface, IPv4Network, IPv6Address, IPv6Interface, IPv6Network\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom typing import (\n    TYPE_CHECKING,\n    Any,\n    Callable,\n    Deque,\n    Dict,\n    FrozenSet,\n    Generator,\n    Hashable,\n    List,\n    NamedTuple,\n    Pattern,\n    Set,\n    Tuple,\n    Type,\n    TypeVar,\n    Union,\n)\nfrom uuid import UUID\n\nfrom . import errors\nfrom .datetime_parse import parse_date, parse_datetime, parse_duration, parse_time\nfrom .typing import (\n    AnyCallable,\n    ForwardRef,\n    all_literal_values,\n    display_as_type,\n    get_class,\n    is_callable_type,\n    is_literal_type,\n    is_namedtuple,\n    is_none_type,\n    is_typeddict,\n)\nfrom .utils import almost_equal_floats, lenient_issubclass, sequence_like\n\nif TYPE_CHECKING:\n    from typing_extensions import Literal, TypedDict\n\n    from .config import BaseConfig\n    from .fields import ModelField\n    from .types import ConstrainedDecimal, ConstrainedFloat, ConstrainedInt\n\n    ConstrainedNumber = Union[ConstrainedDecimal, ConstrainedFloat, ConstrainedInt]\n    AnyOrderedDict = OrderedDict[Any, Any]\n    Number = Union[int, float, Decimal]\n    StrBytes = Union[str, bytes]\n\n\ndef str_validator(v: Any) -> Union[str]:\n    if isinstance(v, str):\n        if isinstance(v, Enum):\n            return v.value\n        else:\n            return v\n    elif isinstance(v, (float, int, Decimal)):\n        # is there anything else we want to add here? If you think so, create an issue.\n        return str(v)\n    elif isinstance(v, (bytes, bytearray)):\n        return v.decode()\n    else:\n        raise errors.StrError()\n\n\ndef strict_str_validator(v: Any) -> Union[str]:\n    if isinstance(v, str) and not isinstance(v, Enum):\n        return v\n    raise errors.StrError()\n\n\ndef bytes_validator(v: Any) -> bytes:\n    if isinstance(v, bytes):\n        return v\n    elif isinstance(v, bytearray):\n        return bytes(v)\n    elif isinstance(v, str):\n        return v.encode()\n    elif isinstance(v, (float, int, Decimal)):\n        return str(v).encode()\n    else:\n        raise errors.BytesError()\n\n\ndef strict_bytes_validator(v: Any) -> Union[bytes]:\n    if isinstance(v, bytes):\n        return v\n    elif isinstance(v, bytearray):\n        return bytes(v)\n    else:\n        raise errors.BytesError()\n\n\nBOOL_FALSE = {0, '0', 'off', 'f', 'false', 'n', 'no'}\nBOOL_TRUE = {1, '1', 'on', 't', 'true', 'y', 'yes'}\n\n\ndef bool_validator(v: Any) -> bool:\n    if v is True or v is False:\n        return v\n    if isinstance(v, bytes):\n        v = v.decode()\n    if isinstance(v, str):\n        v = v.lower()\n    try:\n        if v in BOOL_TRUE:\n            return True\n        if v in BOOL_FALSE:\n            return False\n    except TypeError:\n        raise errors.BoolError()\n    raise errors.BoolError()\n\n\ndef int_validator(v: Any) -> int:\n    if isinstance(v, int) and not (v is True or v is False):\n        return v\n\n    try:\n        return int(v)\n    except (TypeError, ValueError):\n        raise errors.IntegerError()\n\n\ndef strict_int_validator(v: Any) -> int:\n    if isinstance(v, int) and not (v is True or v is False):\n        return v\n    raise errors.IntegerError()\n\n\ndef float_validator(v: Any) -> float:\n    if isinstance(v, float):\n        return v\n\n    try:\n        return float(v)\n    except (TypeError, ValueError):\n        raise errors.FloatError()\n\n\ndef strict_float_validator(v: Any) -> float:\n    if isinstance(v, float):\n        return v",
  "start_line": 1,
  "end_line": 150,
  "total_lines": 723,
  "is_truncated": true
}
Generated tokens 64 tokens · stopped: STOP
I need to see `typeddict_validator` and where it's used. It was at the end of `pydantic/validators.py`. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/validators.py<|"|>,start_line': 560}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 8at 89 s147 tokens out11,953 prompt tokens
Wait, I passed `start_line':560` but I got the beginning of the file. Ah, I used `start_line':560` inside `read_file` call but maybe I messed up the syntax or it was truncated? No, I think I just forgot that `read_file` takes `start_line` as a keyword argument and I might have typed it wrong or something.

Wait, I see `start_line':560` (with a quote before start_line). Let me re-try.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
  "start_line": 560
}
Result of read_file 5,293 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
  "content": "\n    NamedTupleModel = create_model_from_namedtuple(\n        namedtuple_cls,\n        __module__=namedtuple_cls.__module__,\n    )\n    namedtuple_cls.__pydantic_model__ = NamedTupleModel  # type: ignore[attr-defined]\n\n    def namedtuple_validator(values: Tuple[Any, ...]) -> NamedTupleT:\n        annotations = NamedTupleModel.__annotations__\n\n        if len(values) > len(annotations):\n            raise errors.ListMaxLengthError(limit_value=len(annotations))\n\n        dict_values: Dict[str, Any] = dict(zip(annotations, values))\n        validated_dict_values: Dict[str, Any] = dict(NamedTupleModel(**dict_values))\n        return namedtuple_cls(**validated_dict_values)\n\n    return namedtuple_validator\n\n\ndef make_typeddict_validator(\n    typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig']  # type: ignore[valid-type]\n) -> Callable[[Any], Dict[str, Any]]:\n    from .annotated_types import create_model_from_typeddict\n\n    TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(\n        typeddict_cls,\n        __config__=config,\n        __module__=typeddict_cls.__module__,\n    )\n    typeddict_cls.__pydantic_model__ = TypedDictModel  # type: ignore[attr-defined]\n\n    def typeddict_validator(values: 'TypedDict') -> Dict[str, Any]:  # type: ignore[valid-type]\n        return TypedDictModel.parse_obj(values).dict(exclude_unset=True)\n\n    return typeddict_validator\n\n\nclass IfConfig:\n    def __init__(self, validator: AnyCallable, *config_attr_names: str) -> None:\n        self.validator = validator\n        self.config_attr_names = config_attr_names\n\n    def check(self, config: Type['BaseConfig']) -> bool:\n        return any(getattr(config, name) not in {None, False} for name in self.config_attr_names)\n\n\n# order is important here, for example: bool is a subclass of int so has to come first, datetime before date same,\n# IPv4Interface before IPv4Address, etc\n_VALIDATORS: List[Tuple[Type[Any], List[Any]]] = [\n    (IntEnum, [int_validator, enum_member_validator]),\n    (Enum, [enum_member_validator]),\n    (\n        str,\n        [\n            str_validator,\n            IfConfig(anystr_strip_whitespace, 'anystr_strip_whitespace'),\n            IfConfig(anystr_lower, 'anystr_lower'),\n            IfConfig(anystr_length_validator, 'min_anystr_length', 'max_anystr_length'),\n        ],\n    ),\n    (\n        bytes,\n        [\n            bytes_validator,\n            IfConfig(anystr_strip_whitespace, 'anystr_strip_whitespace'),\n            IfConfig(anystr_lower, 'anystr_lower'),\n            IfConfig(anystr_length_validator, 'min_anystr_length', 'max_anystr_length'),\n        ],\n    ),\n    (bool, [bool_validator]),\n    (int, [int_validator]),\n    (float, [float_validator]),\n    (Path, [path_validator]),\n    (datetime, [parse_datetime]),\n    (date, [parse_date]),\n    (time, [parse_time]),\n    (timedelta, [parse_duration]),\n    (OrderedDict, [ordered_dict_validator]),\n    (dict, [dict_validator]),\n    (list, [list_validator]),\n    (tuple, [tuple_validator]),\n    (set, [set_validator]),\n    (frozenset, [frozenset_validator]),\n    (deque, [deque_validator]),\n    (UUID, [uuid_validator]),\n    (Decimal, [decimal_validator]),\n    (IPv4Interface, [ip_v4_interface_validator]),\n    (IPv6Interface, [ip_v6_interface_validator]),\n    (IPv4Address, [ip_v4_address_validator]),\n    (IPv6Address, [ip_v6_address_validator]),\n    (IPv4Network, [ip_v4_network_validator]),\n    (IPv6Network, [ip_v6_network_validator]),\n]\n\n\ndef find_validators(  # noqa: C901 (ignore complexity)\n    type_: Type[Any], config: Type['BaseConfig']\n) -> Generator[AnyCallable, None, None]:\n    from .dataclasses import is_builtin_dataclass, make_dataclass_validator\n\n    if type_ is Any or type_ is object:\n        return\n    type_type = type_.__class__\n    if type_type == ForwardRef or type_type == TypeVar:\n        return\n\n    if is_none_type(type_):\n        yield none_validator\n        return\n    if type_ is Pattern:\n        yield pattern_validator\n        return\n    if type_ is Hashable or type_ is CollectionsHashable:\n        yield hashable_validator\n        return\n    if is_callable_type(type_):\n        yield callable_validator\n        return\n    if is_literal_type(type_):\n        yield make_literal_validator(type_)\n        return\n    if is_builtin_dataclass(type_):\n        yield from make_dataclass_validator(type_, config)\n        return\n    if type_ is Enum:\n        yield enum_validator\n        return\n    if type_ is IntEnum:\n        yield int_enum_validator\n        return\n    if is_namedtuple(type_):\n        yield tuple_validator\n        yield make_namedtuple_validator(type_)\n        return\n    if is_typeddict(type_):\n        yield make_typeddict_validator(type_, config)\n        return\n\n    class_ = get_class(type_)\n    if class_ is not None:\n        if isinstance(class_, type):\n            yield make_class_validator(class_)\n        else:\n            yield any_class_validator\n        return\n\n    for val_type, validators in _VALIDATORS:\n        try:\n            if issubclass(type_, val_type):",
  "start_line": 560,
  "end_line": 709,
  "total_lines": 723,
  "is_truncated": true
}
Generated tokens 147 tokens · stopped: STOP
Wait, I passed `start_line':560` but I got the beginning of the file. Ah, I used `start_line':560` inside `read_file` call but maybe I messed up the syntax or it was truncated? No, I think I just forgot that `read_file` takes `start_line` as a keyword argument and I might have typed it wrong or something. Wait, I see `start_line':560` (with a quote before start_line). Let me re-try. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/validators.py<|"|>,start_line:560}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 9at 189 s1,608 tokens out13,764 prompt tokens
Okay, here is `make_typeddict_validator`:

```python
def make_typeddict_validator(
    typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig']  # type: ignore[valid-type]
) -> Callable[[Any], Dict[str, Any]]:
    from .annotated_types import create_model_from_typeddict

    TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(
        typeddict_cls,
        __config__=config,
        __module__=typeddict_cls.__module__,
    )
    typeddict_cls.__pydantic_model__ = TypedDictModel  # type: ignore[attr-defined]

    def typeddict_validator(values: 'TypedDict') -> Dict[str, Any]:  # type: ignore[valid-type]
        return TypedDictModel.parse_obj(values).dict(exclude_unset=True)

    return typeddict_validator
```

And `find_validators` uses it:
```python
    if is_typeddict(type_):
        yield make_typeddict_validator(type_, config)
        return
```

The `config` passed to `make_typeddict_validator` is the config of the model being validated.

Now let's look at how `validate_arguments` uses this.
`validate_arguments` creates a `DecoratorBaseModel`.
For each argument, Pydantic creates a field.
When the model is instantiated via `parse_obj` (internally called when `DecoratorBaseModel(**values)` is called), the fields are validated.

If a field has type `TypedTest`, Pydantic will use `find_validators` and eventually `make_typeddict_validator`.

Wait, the `DecoratorBaseModel` has its own `Config`:
```python
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra = Extra.forbid
```
`CustomConfig` comes from the `config` passed to `validate_arguments`.

If the user passed `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`, but `Config(CustomConfig)` overrides it with `extra = Extra.forbid`.

Wait, if `extra = Extra.forbid` is set on the `DecoratorBaseModel`, it prevents extra arguments to the *function*, not extra fields in the `TypedDict` argument.

Wait, the error message is:
`pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for Test other -> z extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)`
`other` is the name of the argument. `z` is the extra field in the `TypedDict` passed as `other`.
So the validation error is coming from the validation of the `TypedDict` itself, not from the `DecoratorBaseModel`.

The `TypedDictModel` is created using `create_model_from_typeddict(typeddict_cls, __config__=config, ...)`.
The `config` here is the config of the `DecoratorBaseModel`.

If `DecoratorBaseModel` has `extra = Extra.forbid`, then `TypedDictModel` will also have `extra = Extra.forbid`.

But let's look at `DecoratorBaseModel` again:
```python
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ... validators ...
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra = Extra.forbid
```

If `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`, the `Config` class will still have `extra = Extra.forbid`.

Is this the bug? If the user wants to allow extra arguments to the function, they set `extra = Extra.allow`. But the `DecoratorBaseModel` explicitly forbids extra arguments.

Wait, if the user wanted to allow extra arguments to the function, they'd expect `test(other=..., z=1)` to work. But the issue is about extra fields *inside* the `TypedDict` argument.

Wait, the `typeddict_validator` is called with the `config` of the `DecoratorBaseModel`.
If the `DecoratorBaseModel` has `extra = Extra.forbid`, then the `TypedDictModel` (which is used to validate the `TypedDict` argument) will also have `extra = Extra.forbid`.

If the user wants to allow extra fields in the `TypedDict`, they should be able to do it via the `config` passed to `@validate_arguments`.

If I change:
```python
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra = Extra.forbid
```
to something that respects `CustomConfig.extra` if it's set, but defaults to `Extra.forbid` if it's not.

Wait, `CustomConfig` is a class. If `config` was `{'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` is a class with `extra = Extra.allow`.

If we want `Extra.forbid` as the default for `validate_arguments`, but allow the user to override it:

```python
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ...
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'):
                    extra = Extra.forbid
```
But you can't put `if` statements directly inside a class body like that and expect them to affect the class attributes in that way for Pydantic config (well, you can, but it might be cleaner to do it differently).

Wait, if `CustomConfig` already has `extra`, then `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid` will ALWAYS override it.

Let's see how `CustomConfig` is created:
```python
        if not TYPE_CHECKING:  # pragma: no branch
            if isinstance(config, dict):
                CustomConfig = type('Config', (), config)  # noqa: F811
            elif config is not None:
                CustomConfig = config  # noqa: F811
```

If `config = {'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` is a class with `extra = Extra.allow`.
Then `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid` creates a class where `extra` is always `Extra.forbid`.

To fix this, we should only set `extra = Extra.forbid` if it's not already set in `CustomConfig`.

But wait, if I just remove `extra = Extra.forbid` from `Config`, then it will use the value from `CustomConfig`. If `CustomConfig` doesn't have `extra`, Pydantic's `BaseModel` default for `extra` is `Extra.ignore`.

The current implementation of `validate_arguments` wants `Extra.forbid` as default to prevent unexpected arguments to the function.

Let's verify this. If I remove the `config` argument from `@validate_arguments`, does it forbid extra arguments?
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments\ndef test(x: int):\n    pass\n\ntry:\n    test(x=1, y=2)\n    print(\"Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(e)\nPY\n"
}
Result of run_command 107 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "test() got an unexpected keyword argument 'y'\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 1,608 tokens · stopped: STOP
Okay, here is `make_typeddict_validator`: ```python def make_typeddict_validator( typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig'] # type: ignore[valid-type] ) -> Callable[[Any], Dict[str, Any]]: from .annotated_types import create_model_from_typeddict TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict( typeddict_cls, __config__=config, __module__=typeddict_cls.__module__, ) typeddict_cls.__pydantic_model__ = TypedDictModel # type: ignore[attr-defined] def typeddict_validator(values: 'TypedDict') -> Dict[str, Any]: # type: ignore[valid-type] return TypedDictModel.parse_obj(values).dict(exclude_unset=True) return typeddict_validator ``` And `find_validators` uses it: ```python if is_typeddict(type_): yield make_typeddict_validator(type_, config) return ``` The `config` passed to `make_typeddict_validator` is the config of the model being validated. Now let's look at how `validate_arguments` uses this. `validate_arguments` creates a `DecoratorBaseModel`. For each argument, Pydantic creates a field. When the model is instantiated via `parse_obj` (internally called when `DecoratorBaseModel(**values)` is called), the fields are validated. If a field has type `TypedTest`, Pydantic will use `find_validators` and eventually `make_typeddict_validator`. Wait, the `DecoratorBaseModel` has its own `Config`: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid ``` `CustomConfig` comes from the `config` passed to `validate_arguments`. If the user passed `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`, but `Config(CustomConfig)` overrides it with `extra = Extra.forbid`. Wait, if `extra = Extra.forbid` is set on the `DecoratorBaseModel`, it prevents extra arguments to the *function*, not extra fields in the `TypedDict` argument. Wait, the error message is: `pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for Test other -> z extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)` `other` is the name of the argument. `z` is the extra field in the `TypedDict` passed as `other`. So the validation error is coming from the validation of the `TypedDict` itself, not from the `DecoratorBaseModel`. The `TypedDictModel` is created using `create_model_from_typeddict(typeddict_cls, __config__=config, ...)`. The `config` here is the config of the `DecoratorBaseModel`. If `DecoratorBaseModel` has `extra = Extra.forbid`, then `TypedDictModel` will also have `extra = Extra.forbid`. But let's look at `DecoratorBaseModel` again: ```python class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... validators ... class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid ``` If `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`, the `Config` class will still have `extra = Extra.forbid`. Is this the bug? If the user wants to allow extra arguments to the function, they set `extra = Extra.allow`. But the `DecoratorBaseModel` explicitly forbids extra arguments. Wait, if the user wanted to allow extra arguments to the function, they'd expect `test(other=..., z=1)` to work. But the issue is about extra fields *inside* the `TypedDict` argument. Wait, the `typeddict_validator` is called with the `config` of the `DecoratorBaseModel`. If the `DecoratorBaseModel` has `extra = Extra.forbid`, then the `TypedDictModel` (which is used to validate the `TypedDict` argument) will also have `extra = Extra.forbid`. If the user wants to allow extra fields in the `TypedDict`, they should be able to do it via the `config` passed to `@validate_arguments`. If I change: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid ``` to something that respects `CustomConfig.extra` if it's set, but defaults to `Extra.forbid` if it's not. Wait, `CustomConfig` is a class. If `config` was `{'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` is a class with `extra = Extra.allow`. If we want `Extra.forbid` as the default for `validate_arguments`, but allow the user to override it: ```python class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... class Config(CustomConfig): if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'): extra = Extra.forbid ``` But you can't put `if` statements directly inside a class body like that and expect them to affect the class attributes in that way for Pydantic config (well, you can, but it might be cleaner to do it differently). Wait, if `CustomConfig` already has `extra`, then `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid` will ALWAYS override it. Let's see how `CustomConfig` is created: ```python if not TYPE_CHECKING: # pragma: no branch if isinstance(config, dict): CustomConfig = type('Config', (), config) # noqa: F811 elif config is not None: CustomConfig = config # noqa: F811 ``` If `config = {'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` is a class with `extra = Extra.allow`. Then `class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid` creates a class where `extra` is always `Extra.forbid`. To fix this, we should only set `extra = Extra.forbid` if it's not already set in `CustomConfig`. But wait, if I just remove `extra = Extra.forbid` from `Config`, then it will use the value from `CustomConfig`. If `CustomConfig` doesn't have `extra`, Pydantic's `BaseModel` default for `extra` is `Extra.ignore`. The current implementation of `validate_arguments` wants `Extra.forbid` as default to prevent unexpected arguments to the function. Let's verify this. If I remove the `config` argument from `@validate_arguments`, does it forbid extra arguments? <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY' from pydantic import validate_arguments def test(x: int): pass try: test(x=1, y=2) print("Success") except Exception as e: print(e) PY <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 10at 348 s2,343 tokens out15,421 prompt tokens
Wait, that's a `TypeError` from Python, not a `ValidationError` from Pydantic.
Ah, `validate_arguments` creates a model. When `test(x=1, y=2)` is called:
1. `build_values` is called.
2. `y` is identified as an extra keyword argument because it's not in the function signature.
3. `y` is added to `var_kwargs`.
4. `values[self.v_kwargs_name] = var_kwargs`.
5. `self.model(**values)` is called.

If `self.v_kwargs_name` is 'kwargs', and `kwargs` is a field in `DecoratorBaseModel`, and it's validated by `check_kwargs`:
```python
            @validator(self.v_kwargs_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)
            def check_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
                if takes_kwargs or v is None:
                    return v

                plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'
                keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v.keys()))
                raise TypeError(f'unexpected keyword argument{plural}: {keys}')
```
Since `test` does not take `**kwargs`, `takes_kwargs` is `False`. So `check_kwargs` raises `TypeError`.

So the `extra = Extra.forbid` in `Config` is actually NOT used for the function's extra arguments! The function's extra arguments are handled by `check_kwargs` validator.

So what is `extra = Extra.forbid` doing in `Config`?
It's for the `DecoratorBaseModel` itself. But the `DecoratorBaseModel` is used to wrap the function arguments.

The `TypedDictModel` is created using the `config` of `DecoratorBaseModel`.
```python
    def make_typeddict_validator(
        typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig']  # type: ignore[valid-type]
    ) -> Callable[[Any], Dict[str, Any]]:
        # ...
        TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(
            typeddict_cls,
            __config__=config,
            __module__=typeddict_cls.__module__,
        )
```
Wait, if `DecoratorBaseModel` has `extra = Extra.forbid` in its `Config`, then `TypedDictModel` will also have `Extra.forbid`.

If we want to allow the user to specify `extra` for the `TypedDict` (and other things) via the `config` argument of `validate_arguments`, we should not blindly override `extra = Extra.forbid`.

But wait, if we remove `extra = Extra.forbid`, then `DecoratorBaseModel` will use `Extra.ignore` (default) or whatever is in `CustomConfig`.

Wait, if `DecoratorBaseModel` uses `Extra.ignore`, does it matter?
The fields of `DecoratorBaseModel` are the function arguments, plus `v_args_name`, `v_kwargs_name`, etc.
`build_values` prepares the dictionary for `**values`.
It only puts `v_args_name`, `v_kwargs_name`, etc. and the actual arguments.
It doesn't put any other fields.

So `DecoratorBaseModel` will never actually receive "extra" fields in the sense of Pydantic models.
The "extra" fields are already handled by `build_values` moving them into `v_kwargs_name`.

So `extra = Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` seems to only serve as a default for the validators that it also uses (like `make_typeddict_validator`).

If I change:
```python
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra = Extra.forbid
```
to:
```python
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                pass
```
And then the default `extra` for `TypedDictModel` will be `Extra.ignore`.

The user's expectation is that if they provide `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, it should be allowed.

Let's see what happens if I remove `extra = Extra.forbid`.

But wait, what if the user *doesn't* provide a config? Then `CustomConfig` will be the default `type('Config', (), {})`.
If I remove `extra = Extra.forbid`, then the default for `TypedDict` validation will be `Extra.ignore`.
Is `Extra.ignore` acceptable as the default for `TypedDict` validation in `validate_arguments`?
Actually, Pydantic's default for models is `Extra.ignore`.

The current code specifically sets it to `Extra.forbid`. This means by default, `validate_arguments` is STRICT about `TypedDict` arguments.

If the user wants to make it ALLOW, they set `extra = Extra.allow`.

The fix is to only set `extra = Extra.forbid` if the user didn't specify an `extra` config.

Wait, `CustomConfig` is a class. I can check if it has an `extra` attribute.

```python
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ...
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'):
                    extra = Extra.forbid
```
Wait, I can't do that. I should do:

```python
        # ...
        # Instead of:
        # class Config(CustomConfig):
        #     extra = Extra.forbid
        
        # Do something like:
        # config_dict = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)
        # ... but it needs to be in a class ...
```

Actually, `CustomConfig` is already a class.
If I want to set `extra` only if it's not already there:

```python
        class DecorBaseConfig(CustomConfig):
            pass
        if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'):
            DecoratorBaseConfig.extra = Extra.forbid
```

But `DecoratorBaseModel` needs a `Config` inner class.

```python
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ...
            Config = DecoratorBaseConfig
```

Wait, can I just do this:

```python
        # In create_model method:
        # ...
        class DecoratorBaseConfig(CustomConfig):
            pass
        if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'):
            DecoratorBaseConfig.extra = Extra.forbid
        
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ...
            Config = DecoratorBaseConfig
```

Let's check if this works.

Wait, I should check where `CustomConfig` is defined. It's inside `create_model`.

Let's try this change and see if it fixes the reproduction and doesn't break anything.

Wait, before I do that, let me double check what happens if I just remove `extra = Extra.forbid`.

If I remove it:
1. User provides `config={'extra': Extra.allow}` -> `CustomConfig.extra = Extra.allow` -> `Config.extra = Extra.allow`. Works.
2. User provides no config -> `CustomConfig` has no `extra` -> `Config` has no `extra` -> `TypedDictModel` has no `extra` -> Default `Extra.ignore`.

Is `Extra.ignore` okay for the default?
The previous behavior was `Extra.forbid`.

If I want to preserve `Extra.forbid` as default:

```python
        class DecoratorBaseConfig(CustomConfig):
            pass
        if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'):
            DecoratorBaseConfig.extra = Extra.forbid
        
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ...
            Config = DecoratorBaseConfig
```

Let's see if I can find a simpler way.
Maybe:

```python
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ...
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra: Any = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)
```
Since `Config` is a class, `extra` will be evaluated at class definition time.
`getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)` will return the `extra` from `CustomConfig` if it exists, otherwise `Extra.forbid`.

This looks clean and should work.

Let's verify:
1. `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`: `CustomConfig.extra` is `Extra.allow`. `getattr(...)` returns `Extra.allow`. `Config.extra = Extra.allow`.
2. `config=None`: `CustomConfig` is `type('Config', (), {})`. `CustomConfig` has no `extra`. `getattr(...)` returns `Extra.forbid`. `Config.extra = Extra.forbid`.

This perfectly preserves the default behavior while allowing the override.

Let's test this hypothesis with a reproduction script.

I'll first create a repro script that tests both the bug and the default behavior.

Repro script:
1. `TypedDict` with `Extra.allow` should succeed.
2. `TypedDict` with no config should fail (preserving current behavior).
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom typing_extensions import TypedDict\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra\n\nclass TypedTest(TypedDict):\n    y: str\n\n@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})\ndef test_allow(other: TypedTest):\n    pass\n\ndef test_default(other: TypedTest):\n    pass\ntest_default = validate_arguments(test_default)\n\nprint(\"Testing Extra.allow...\")\ntry:\n    test_allow(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n    print(\"test_allow: Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(f\"test_allow: Failed: {e}\")\n\nprint(\"\\nTesting default (should forbid)...\")\ntry:\n    test_default(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n    print(\"test_default: Success (This is WRONG, should have failed)\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(f\"test_default: Failed (Expected): {e}\")\nPY\n"
}
Result of run_command 379 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "Testing Extra.allow...\ntest_allow: Failed: 1 validation error for TestAllow\nother -> z\n  extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)\n\nTesting default (should forbid)...\ntest_default: Failed (Expected): 1 validation error for TestDefault\nother -> z\n  extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 2,343 tokens · stopped: STOP
Wait, that's a `TypeError` from Python, not a `ValidationError` from Pydantic. Ah, `validate_arguments` creates a model. When `test(x=1, y=2)` is called: 1. `build_values` is called. 2. `y` is identified as an extra keyword argument because it's not in the function signature. 3. `y` is added to `var_kwargs`. 4. `values[self.v_kwargs_name] = var_kwargs`. 5. `self.model(**values)` is called. If `self.v_kwargs_name` is 'kwargs', and `kwargs` is a field in `DecoratorBaseModel`, and it's validated by `check_kwargs`: ```python @validator(self.v_kwargs_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True) def check_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]: if takes_kwargs or v is None: return v plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's' keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v.keys())) raise TypeError(f'unexpected keyword argument{plural}: {keys}') ``` Since `test` does not take `**kwargs`, `takes_kwargs` is `False`. So `check_kwargs` raises `TypeError`. So the `extra = Extra.forbid` in `Config` is actually NOT used for the function's extra arguments! The function's extra arguments are handled by `check_kwargs` validator. So what is `extra = Extra.forbid` doing in `Config`? It's for the `DecoratorBaseModel` itself. But the `DecoratorBaseModel` is used to wrap the function arguments. The `TypedDictModel` is created using the `config` of `DecoratorBaseModel`. ```python def make_typeddict_validator( typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig'] # type: ignore[valid-type] ) -> Callable[[Any], Dict[str, Any]]: # ... TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict( typeddict_cls, __config__=config, __module__=typeddict_cls.__module__, ) ``` Wait, if `DecoratorBaseModel` has `extra = Extra.forbid` in its `Config`, then `TypedDictModel` will also have `Extra.forbid`. If we want to allow the user to specify `extra` for the `TypedDict` (and other things) via the `config` argument of `validate_arguments`, we should not blindly override `extra = Extra.forbid`. But wait, if we remove `extra = Extra.forbid`, then `DecoratorBaseModel` will use `Extra.ignore` (default) or whatever is in `CustomConfig`. Wait, if `DecoratorBaseModel` uses `Extra.ignore`, does it matter? The fields of `DecoratorBaseModel` are the function arguments, plus `v_args_name`, `v_kwargs_name`, etc. `build_values` prepares the dictionary for `**values`. It only puts `v_args_name`, `v_kwargs_name`, etc. and the actual arguments. It doesn't put any other fields. So `DecoratorBaseModel` will never actually receive "extra" fields in the sense of Pydantic models. The "extra" fields are already handled by `build_values` moving them into `v_kwargs_name`. So `extra = Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` seems to only serve as a default for the validators that it also uses (like `make_typeddict_validator`). If I change: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid ``` to: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): pass ``` And then the default `extra` for `TypedDictModel` will be `Extra.ignore`. The user's expectation is that if they provide `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, it should be allowed. Let's see what happens if I remove `extra = Extra.forbid`. But wait, what if the user *doesn't* provide a config? Then `CustomConfig` will be the default `type('Config', (), {})`. If I remove `extra = Extra.forbid`, then the default for `TypedDict` validation will be `Extra.ignore`. Is `Extra.ignore` acceptable as the default for `TypedDict` validation in `validate_arguments`? Actually, Pydantic's default for models is `Extra.ignore`. The current code specifically sets it to `Extra.forbid`. This means by default, `validate_arguments` is STRICT about `TypedDict` arguments. If the user wants to make it ALLOW, they set `extra = Extra.allow`. The fix is to only set `extra = Extra.forbid` if the user didn't specify an `extra` config. Wait, `CustomConfig` is a class. I can check if it has an `extra` attribute. ```python class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... class Config(CustomConfig): if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'): extra = Extra.forbid ``` Wait, I can't do that. I should do: ```python # ... # Instead of: # class Config(CustomConfig): # extra = Extra.forbid # Do something like: # config_dict = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid) # ... but it needs to be in a class ... ``` Actually, `CustomConfig` is already a class. If I want to set `extra` only if it's not already there: ```python class DecorBaseConfig(CustomConfig): pass if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'): DecoratorBaseConfig.extra = Extra.forbid ``` But `DecoratorBaseModel` needs a `Config` inner class. ```python class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... Config = DecoratorBaseConfig ``` Wait, can I just do this: ```python # In create_model method: # ... class DecoratorBaseConfig(CustomConfig): pass if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'): DecoratorBaseConfig.extra = Extra.forbid class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... Config = DecoratorBaseConfig ``` Let's check if this works. Wait, I should check where `CustomConfig` is defined. It's inside `create_model`. Let's try this change and see if it fixes the reproduction and doesn't break anything. Wait, before I do that, let me double check what happens if I just remove `extra = Extra.forbid`. If I remove it: 1. User provides `config={'extra': Extra.allow}` -> `CustomConfig.extra = Extra.allow` -> `Config.extra = Extra.allow`. Works. 2. User provides no config -> `CustomConfig` has no `extra` -> `Config` has no `extra` -> `TypedDictModel` has no `extra` -> Default `Extra.ignore`. Is `Extra.ignore` okay for the default? The previous behavior was `Extra.forbid`. If I want to preserve `Extra.forbid` as default: ```python class DecoratorBaseConfig(CustomConfig): pass if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'): DecoratorBaseConfig.extra = Extra.forbid class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... Config = DecoratorBaseConfig ``` Let's see if I can find a simpler way. Maybe: ```python class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... class Config(CustomConfig): extra: Any = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid) ``` Since `Config` is a class, `extra` will be evaluated at class definition time. `getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)` will return the `extra` from `CustomConfig` if it exists, otherwise `Extra.forbid`. This looks clean and should work. Let's verify: 1. `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`: `CustomConfig.extra` is `Extra.allow`. `getattr(...)` returns `Extra.allow`. `Config.extra = Extra.allow`. 2. `config=None`: `CustomConfig` is `type('Config', (), {})`. `CustomConfig` has no `extra`. `getattr(...)` returns `Extra.forbid`. `Config.extra = Extra.forbid`. This perfectly preserves the default behavior while allowing the override. Let's test this hypothesis with a reproduction script. I'll first create a repro script that tests both the bug and the default behavior. Repro script: 1. `TypedDict` with `Extra.allow` should succeed. 2. `TypedDict` with no config should fail (preserving current behavior).<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY' from typing_extensions import TypedDict from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra class TypedTest(TypedDict): y: str @validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow}) def test_allow(other: TypedTest): pass def test_default(other: TypedTest): pass test_default = validate_arguments(test_default) print("Testing Extra.allow...") try: test_allow(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}) print("test_allow: Success") except Exception as e: print(f"test_allow: Failed: {e}") print("\nTesting default (should forbid)...") try: test_default(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}) print("test_default: Success (This is WRONG, should have failed)") except Exception as e: print(f"test_default: Failed (Expected): {e}") PY <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 11at 407 s211 tokens out8,265 prompt tokens
Okay, so the repro confirms the bug: `test_allow` fails.
And it confirms the current default behavior: `test_default` also fails (which is what we want to preserve).

Now I will apply the fix.

The code block is:
```python
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra = Extra.forbid
```
in `pydantic/decorator.py`.

I'll change it to:
```python
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra: Any = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)
```
Wait, I need to make sure `Any` is available. `Any` is imported at the top of `pydantic/decorator.py`.

Let's check the imports in `pydantic/decorator.py`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "end_line": 50,
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
  "start_line": 1
}
Result of read_file 1,728 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
  "content": "from functools import wraps\nfrom typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Callable, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional, Tuple, Type, TypeVar, Union, overload\n\nfrom . import validator\nfrom .config import Extra\nfrom .errors import ConfigError\nfrom .main import BaseModel, create_model\nfrom .typing import get_all_type_hints\nfrom .utils import to_camel\n\n__all__ = ('validate_arguments',)\n\nif TYPE_CHECKING:\n    from .typing import AnyCallable\n\n    AnyCallableT = TypeVar('AnyCallableT', bound=AnyCallable)\n    ConfigType = Union[None, Type[Any], Dict[str, Any]]\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: None = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Callable[['AnyCallableT'], 'AnyCallableT']:\n    ...\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: 'AnyCallableT') -> 'AnyCallableT':\n    ...\n\n\ndef validate_arguments(func: Optional['AnyCallableT'] = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Any:\n    \"\"\"\n    Decorator to validate the arguments passed to a function.\n    \"\"\"\n\n    def validate(_func: 'AnyCallable') -> 'AnyCallable':\n        vd = ValidatedFunction(_func, config)\n\n        @wraps(_func)\n        def wrapper_function(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:\n            return vd.call(*args, **kwargs)\n\n        wrapper_function.vd = vd  # type: ignore\n        wrapper_function.validate = vd.init_model_instance  # type: ignore\n        wrapper_function.raw_function = vd.raw_function  # type: ignore\n        wrapper_function.model = vd.model  # type: ignore\n        return wrapper_function\n\n    if func:\n        return validate(func)\n    else:",
  "start_line": 1,
  "end_line": 50,
  "total_lines": 259,
  "is_truncated": false
}
Generated tokens 211 tokens · stopped: STOP
Okay, so the repro confirms the bug: `test_allow` fails. And it confirms the current default behavior: `test_default` also fails (which is what we want to preserve). Now I will apply the fix. The code block is: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid ``` in `pydantic/decorator.py`. I'll change it to: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): extra: Any = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid) ``` Wait, I need to make sure `Any` is available. `Any` is imported at the top of `pydantic/decorator.py`. Let's check the imports in `pydantic/decorator.py`.<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/decorator.py<|"|>,start_line:1,end_line:50}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 12at 429 s331 tokens out9,018 prompt tokens
`Any` is imported.

Now I'll apply the fix.

Wait, I should check if there are any other places where `CustomConfig` is used in `DecoratorBaseModel`.
In `pydantic/decorator.py`:
```python
        class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
            # ...
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra = Extra.forbid
```
This is the only place where `CustomConfig` is used in `DecoratorBaseModel`.

Let's apply the fix.

Actually, instead of `extra: Any = ...`, I can just use `extra = getattr(...)`.
The type hint `: Any` is not strictly necessary for the class attribute to be set correctly at runtime.

Wait, `extra` is a known field in Pydantic's `BaseConfig`.

Let's use:
```python
            class Config(CustomConfig):
                extra = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)
```

Wait, let me check `pydantic/config.py` to see if `extra` is truly just an attribute of `BaseConfig`.
Yes, it is.

Applying the fix.
TOOL CALL · edit_file
{
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
  "new_string": "            class Config(CustomConfig):\n                extra = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)",
  "old_string": "            class Config(CustomConfig):\n                extra = Extra.forbid"
}
Result of edit_file 560 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
  "occurrences": 1,
  "strategy": "exact",
  "diff": "--- a/pydantic/decorator.py\n+++ b/pydantic/decorator.py\n@@ -254,6 +254,6 @@\n                 raise TypeError(f'multiple values for argument{plural}: {keys}')\n \n             class Config(CustomConfig):\n-                extra = Extra.forbid\n+                extra = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)\n \n         self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)\n",
  "is_truncated": false
}
Generated tokens 331 tokens · stopped: STOP
`Any` is imported. Now I'll apply the fix. Wait, I should check if there are any other places where `CustomConfig` is used in `DecoratorBaseModel`. In `pydantic/decorator.py`: ```python class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel): # ... class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid ``` This is the only place where `CustomConfig` is used in `DecoratorBaseModel`. Let's apply the fix. Actually, instead of `extra: Any = ...`, I can just use `extra = getattr(...)`. The type hint `: Any` is not strictly necessary for the class attribute to be set correctly at runtime. Wait, `extra` is a known field in Pydantic's `BaseConfig`. Let's use: ```python class Config(CustomConfig): extra = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid) ``` Wait, let me check `pydantic/config.py` to see if `extra` is truly just an attribute of `BaseConfig`. Yes, it is. Applying the fix.<channel|><|tool_call>call:edit_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/decorator.py<|"|>,new_string:<|"|> class Config(CustomConfig): extra = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)<|"|>,old_string:<|"|> class Config(CustomConfig): extra = Extra.forbid<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 13at 438 s263 tokens out9,540 prompt tokens
Now let's run the repro script again to verify the fix.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom typing_extensions import TypedDict\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra\n\nclass TypedTest(TypedDict):\n    y: str\n\n@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})\ndef test_allow(other: TypedTest):\n    pass\n\ndef test_default(other: TypedTest):\n    pass\ntest_default = validate_arguments(test_default)\n\nprint(\"Testing Extra.allow...\")\ntry:\n    test_allow(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n    print(\"test_allow: Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(f\"test_allow: Failed: {e}\")\n\nprint(\"\\nTesting default (should forbid)...\")\ntry:\n    test_default(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n    print(\"test_default: Success (This is WRONG, should have failed)\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(f\"test_default: Failed (Expected): {e}\")\nPY\n"
}
Result of run_command 279 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "Testing Extra.allow...\ntest_allow: Success\n\nTesting default (should forbid)...\ntest_default: Failed (Expected): 1 validation error for TestDefault\nother -> z\n  extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 263 tokens · stopped: STOP
Now let's run the repro script again to verify the fix. <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY' from typing_extensions import TypedDict from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra class TypedTest(TypedDict): y: str @validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow}) def test_allow(other: TypedTest): pass def test_default(other: TypedTest): pass test_default = validate_arguments(test_default) print("Testing Extra.allow...") try: test_allow(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}) print("test_allow: Success") except Exception as e: print(f"test_allow: Failed: {e}") print("\nTesting default (should forbid)...") try: test_default(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}) print("test_default: Success (This is WRONG, should have failed)") except Exception as e: print(f"test_default: Failed (Expected): {e}") PY <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 14at 445 s185 tokens out9,901 prompt tokens
The repro now passes! `test_allow` succeeds and `test_default` still forbids extra fields.

Now let's verify that it also works with `Extra.ignore`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom typing_extensions import TypedDict\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra\n\nclass TypedTest(TypedDict):\n    y: str\n\n@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.ignore})\ndef test_ignore(other: TypedTest):\n    pass\n\nprint(\"Testing Extra.ignore...\")\ntry:\n    test_ignore(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n    print(\"test_ignore: Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n    print(f\"test_ignore: Failed: {e}\")\nPY\n"
}
Result of run_command 107 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "Testing Extra.ignore...\ntest_ignore: Success\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 185 tokens · stopped: STOP
The repro now passes! `test_allow` succeeds and `test_default` still forbids extra fields. Now let's verify that it also works with `Extra.ignore`. <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY' from typing_extensions import TypedDict from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra class TypedTest(TypedDict): y: str @validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.ignore}) def test_ignore(other: TypedTest): pass print("Testing Extra.ignore...") try: test_ignore(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}) print("test_ignore: Success") except Exception as e: print(f"test_ignore: Failed: {e}") PY <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>

Patch, tests and logs

Final code change Included
diff --git a/pydantic/decorator.py b/pydantic/decorator.py
index ca709b4..ced4953 100644
--- a/pydantic/decorator.py
+++ b/pydantic/decorator.py
@@ -254,6 +254,6 @@ class ValidatedFunction:
                 raise TypeError(f'multiple values for argument{plural}: {keys}')
 
             class Config(CustomConfig):
-                extra = Extra.forbid
+                extra = getattr(CustomConfig, 'extra', Extra.forbid)
 
         self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)
Test output Included
============================= test session starts ==============================
collected 23 items

tests/test_decorator.py .......................                          [100%]

==================================== PASSES ====================================
- generated xml file: /tmp/rebench-grade-b918ceb612574c308ba88fdf968eb149.xml --
=========================== short test summary info ============================
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_args
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_wrap
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_kwargs
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_untyped
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_var_args_kwargs[True]
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_var_args_kwargs[False]
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_field_can_provide_factory
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_annotated_field_can_provide_factory
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_positional_only
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_args_name
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_v_args
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_async
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_string_annotation
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_item_method
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_class_method
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_config_title
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_config_title_cls
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_config_fields
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_config_arbitrary_types_allowed
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_validate
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_validate_all
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_validate_all_positional
PASSED tests/test_decorator.py::test_validate_extra
============================== 23 passed in 0.05s ==============================
Test errors Included
Test report (JUnit) Included
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><testsuites><testsuite name="pytest" errors="0" failures="0" skipped="0" tests="23" time="0.052" timestamp="2026-11-14T03:33:58.289003" hostname="1a3ed92b335c"><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_args" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_wrap" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_kwargs" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_untyped" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_var_args_kwargs[True]" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_var_args_kwargs[False]" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_field_can_provide_factory" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_annotated_field_can_provide_factory" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_positional_only" time="0.003" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_args_name" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_v_args" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_async" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_string_annotation" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_item_method" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_class_method" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_config_title" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_config_title_cls" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_config_fields" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_config_arbitrary_types_allowed" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_validate" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_validate_all" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_validate_all_positional" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tests.test_decorator" name="test_validate_extra" time="0.002" /></testsuite></testsuites>
Agent log Included
  [   0.0s] 📋 System Prompt: You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`.
  [   0.0s] 🎯 Task Prompt: You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository samuelcolvin/pydantic.
  [  18.9s] 💭 (728 chars) "The user is reporting a bug where `Extra.allow` config in `validate_arguments` is not 
respected when the argument is a `..."
  [  18.9s] 🔧 run_command (17 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
  [  19.1s]   → 1 validation error for Test
  [  27.0s] 💭 (323 chars) "The bug is reproduced. Now I need to find where `validate_arguments` and `TypedDict` 
validation are handled.

`validate_..."
  [  27.0s] 🔧 run_command (2 lines) grep -rn --include="*.py" "validate_arguments" pydantic/ | head -n 20
  [  27.0s]   → pydantic/fields.py:407:                    # check also `Required` because of `validate_arguments` that 
sets `...` as de
  [  38.0s] 💭 (490 chars) "`pydantic/decorator.py` contains `validate_arguments`.
`pydantic/validators.py` seems to have `typeddict_validator` whic..."
  [  38.0s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn --include="*.py" "create_model_from_typeddict" pydantic/
  [  38.1s]   → pydantic/annotated_types.py:10:def create_model_from_typeddict(
  [  42.7s] 💭 (147 chars) "Okay, `create_model_from_typeddict` is in `pydantic/annotated_types.py`.

Let's read `pydantic/decorator.py` to see how ..."
  [  42.7s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/decorator.py)
  [  42.8s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/decorator.py', 'content': 'from functools import wraps\nfrom 
typing import TYPE_C…
  [  47.2s] 💭 (89 chars) "I need to see the rest of `ValidatedFunction` and specifically its `create_model` method."
  [  47.2s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/decorator.py)
  [  47.2s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/decorator.py', 'content': '\n        var_kwargs = {}\n        
wrong_positional_ar…
  [  74.4s] 💭 (1407 chars) "In `create_model`:
```python
        class Config(CustomConfig):
            extra = Extra.forbid
```
Wait, this `Config..."
  [  74.4s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/validators.py)
  [  74.4s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/validators.py', 'content': "import re\nfrom collections import 
OrderedDict, deque…
  [  78.0s] 💭 (103 chars) "I need to see `typeddict_validator` and where it's used. It was at the end of 
`pydantic/validators.py`."
  [  78.0s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/validators.py)
  [  78.0s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/validators.py', 'content': "import re\nfrom collections import 
OrderedDict, deque…
  [  88.3s] 💭 (386 chars) "Wait, I passed `start_line':560` but I got the beginning of the file. Ah, I used 
`start_line':560` inside `read_file` ca..."
  [  88.3s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/validators.py)
  [  88.4s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/validators.py', 'content': "\n    NamedTupleModel = 
create_model_from_namedtuple(…
  [ 188.6s] 💭 (5738 chars) "Okay, here is `make_typeddict_validator`:

```python
def make_typeddict_validator(
    typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'],..."
  [ 188.6s] 🔧 run_command (11 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
  [ 188.7s]   → test() got an unexpected keyword argument 'y'
  [ 347.9s] 💭 (7724 chars) "Wait, that's a `TypeError` from Python, not a `ValidationError` from Pydantic.
Ah, `validate_arguments` creates a model...."
  [ 347.9s] 🔧 run_command (29 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
  [ 348.0s]   → Testing Extra.allow...
  [ 406.5s] 💭 (635 chars) "Okay, so the repro confirms the bug: `test_allow` fails.
And it confirms the current default behavior: `test_default` al..."
  [ 406.5s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/decorator.py)
  [ 406.5s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/decorator.py', 'content': 'from functools import wraps\nfrom 
typing import TYPE_C…
  [ 428.5s] 💭 (944 chars) "`Any` is imported.

Now I'll apply the fix.

Wait, I should check if there are any other places where `CustomConfig` is ..."
  [ 428.5s] ✏️ edit_file (pydantic/decorator.py)
  [ 428.6s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/decorator.py', 'occurrences': 1, 'strategy': 'exact', 'diff': 
"--- a/pydantic/dec…
  [ 437.5s] 💭 (55 chars) "Now let's run the repro script again to verify the fix."
  [ 437.5s] 🔧 run_command (29 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
  [ 437.6s]   → Testing Extra.allow...
  [ 444.7s] 💭 (148 chars) "The repro now passes! `test_allow` succeeds and `test_default` still forbids extra fields.

Now let's verify that it als..."
  [ 444.7s] 🔧 run_command (18 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
  [ 444.8s]   → Testing Extra.ignore...
Native result row
{
  "agent_error": "Agent exceeded session timeout (7.5 min)",
  "duration_seconds": 454.47,
  "error": "Agent exceeded session timeout (7.5 min)",
  "grade": {
    "collected_tests": 23,
    "competition_junit_ok": true,
    "error": null,
    "required_issues_count": 0,
    "resolved": true,
    "status_counts": {
      "PASSED": 23
    },
    "strict_clean_patch": true,
    "test_exit_code": 0
  },
  "instance_id": "samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177",
  "pass_idx": 0,
  "patch_chars": 537,
  "phase1_seconds": 452.9,
  "repo": "samuelcolvin/pydantic",
  "request_log_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/requests/samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177__p0__r5.jsonl",
  "resolved": true,
  "rollout_idx": 5,
  "run_key": "samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177__p0__r5",
  "strict_clean_patch": true,
  "tool_calls": 14,
  "total_llm_calls": 14,
  "trace_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/traces/trace_samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177__p0__r5.json"
}