ROLLOUT 3 · samuelcolvin/pydantic
samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177
Not solved
465 stotal time
13tool calls
13model calls
4,683tokens generated
126,342prompt tokens read
Empty agent patch
Turn by turn
Token shading: p ≥ 0.9 0.5 – 0.9 0.2 – 0.5 below 0.2. Hover a token for its id and probability.
System instructions 4,822 characters
You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`. Your sole objective is to produce a minimal, root-cause source patch that passes every hidden fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass regression test on the first grading run. ## Critical Environment & Grader Rules 1. **Air-Gapped Sandbox & Available CLI Tools**: No network access. Never run `pip`, `uv`, `conda`, or `git fetch`. Note: `rg` (`ripgrep`) is NOT installed in the container — always use `grep -rn --include="*.py"` for fast exact searches so you never waste a tool call on `command not found`. 2. **Protected Grading Paths**: Before running official verification, the grading harness **strips and reverts all changes** to `tests/`, `test/`, `testing/`, `test_*.py`, `*_test.py`, `conftest.py`, `pyproject.toml`, `setup.cfg`, `pytest.ini`, and `tox.ini`. Every part of your fix MUST reside in non-test production source files. 3. **Untracked File Trap (`git add -N .`)**: `submit_patch` stages ALL untracked files inside `/workspace`! Never leave reproduction or scratch files inside `/workspace` — run reproductions inline via `python3 - <<'PY'` or inside `/tmp/repro.py` in a single `run_command`. 4. **Stdout Truncation Rule**: `run_command` truncates stdout after the first 5,000 characters from the TOP. Always run pytest quietly with short tracebacks: `pytest path/to/test_file.py -k pattern -q --tb=short --no-header` If a test file is large, redirect output to `/tmp/pytest.log` and inspect `tail -n 80 /tmp/pytest.log` so failure tracebacks at the bottom are never cut off. 5. **Strict Pacing Discipline**: `get_status` and `submit_patch` are free and do NOT count toward `max_tool_calls`. Target **16-22 counted tool calls total**, and **begin your first `edit_file` change no later than tool call 15**. Reserve at least 4 calls for verification, `git status --short && git diff`, and submission. ## Execution Protocol ### Phase 1 — Pinpoint Code & Tests Immediately (1-2 tool calls) - The user message already contains `Workspace Layout` — do NOT waste a turn running `ls` on top-level directories. - Run a single compound `run_command` with `grep -rn --include="*.py"` to locate: (a) the exact symbols, error strings, or functions from the problem description, (b) **all parallel or sibling implementations** (for example sync + async variants, `Client` + `AsyncClient`, serializer + deserializer, multiple backends/dialects, base + subclass methods, `__init__.py` / `__all__` exports), and (c) the closest existing unit test files under `tests/`. ### Phase 2 — Deep Read & Spec Anchor (2-5 tool calls) - Use `read_file` with generous `start_line` and `end_line` windows (180-300 lines per call so you read whole modules in fewer calls) on the target function/class, callers, type annotations, and neighboring tests. - Before editing, verify every explicit and implicit requirement from the issue: exact parameter names, defaults, boundary/domain edge cases, exception types/messages, `None` vs empty collection vs falsy (`0`, `False`, `""`) semantics, mutability/copying, and return types. ### Phase 3 — Reproduce Bug in One Call (1 tool call) - Run ONE concise command (`python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` or targeted `pytest ... -q --tb=short --no-header`) via `run_command` to observe the exact pre-fix failure. Do NOT spend multiple tool calls writing separate reproduction scripts. ### Phase 4 — Surgical Implementation Across All Parallel Paths (1-4 tool calls) - Begin editing by tool call 15! Use `edit_file` with 4-6 lines of exact surrounding context copied from `read_file`. - Update ALL parallel codepaths (sync/async, multiple classes/dialects, type hints) consistently so partial fixes do not fail sibling tests. - **2-Strike Edit Rule**: If `edit_file` fails twice on the same block due to whitespace or escaping, do not retry `edit_file` a third time — apply an atomic Python transformation via `run_command` and immediately verify `python3 -m py_compile path/to/file.py`. ### Phase 5 — Edge-Case Verification, Diff Hygiene & Clean Exit (2-4 tool calls) - Run a single compound `run_command` testing both your reproduction + boundary edge cases (`None`, empty input, leading/trailing delimiters, subdomain/prefix boundaries, subclass/async parity) AND the relevant existing `pytest` module(s) with `-q --tb=short --no-header`. - Run `git status --short && git diff` via `run_command`. Confirm: - ZERO untracked (`??`) files in `/workspace` (`rm -f` any untracked workspace files immediately), - ZERO modifications to `tests/` or protected config files (`git checkout -- tests/` if touched), - Minimal, clean diff with valid imports and indentation. - Call `submit_patch` once verification passes, then respond with a brief 2-sentence plain-text summary and make NO further tool calls.
Task prompt 5,779 characters
You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository samuelcolvin/pydantic.
Problem Statement:
"extra" config not respected for TypedDicts in functions
### Checks
* [x] I added a descriptive title to this issue
* [x] I have searched (google, github) for similar issues and couldn't find anything
* [x] I have read and followed [the docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and still think this is a bug
<!-- Sorry to sound so draconian, but every second saved replying to issues is time spend improving pydantic :-) -->
# Bug
Output of `python -c "import pydantic.utils; print(pydantic.utils.version_info())"`:
```
pydantic version: 1.8.2
pydantic compiled: False
install path: /home/msharma216/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pydantic
python version: 3.8.0 (default, Feb 25 2021, 22:10:10) [GCC 8.4.0]
platform: Linux-4.4.0-19041-Microsoft-x86_64-with-glibc2.27
optional deps. installed: ['typing-extensions']
```
<!-- or if you're using pydantic prior to v1.3, manually include: OS, python version and pydantic version -->
<!-- Please read the [docs](https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/) and search through issues to
confirm your bug hasn't already been reported. -->
<!-- Where possible please include a self-contained code snippet describing your bug: -->
When trying to use the `validate_arguments` decorator, I face the issue of getting validation errors for an extra attribute for a TypedDict as below:
```py
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
```
Output:
```
pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for Test
other -> z
extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)
```
Expected: No errors
Anything I have missed that would let this validation pass for extra attributes in the TypedDict?
Thanks very much!
## Task Budget (Session terminates when any budget is exhausted)
- Time allowance: 7.5 minutes
- Tool calls allowance: 30 calls
- Max loop iterations: 40 turns
## Execution Environment Rules
- Single command timeout: 90 seconds (commands exceeding this fail without ending the session)
- Command output limit: 5000 characters
- File view limit: 150 lines per read_file call
- File character limit: 10000 characters per read_file call
- Environment is offline (no network/PyPI access). All repository and test dependencies are ALREADY pre-installed. Do NOT attempt to run pip install or download packages.
## Instructions:
0. All source code is under `/workspace`. Do NOT search outside `/workspace` (e.g. `/usr/`, `/wheels/`, system site-packages). If imports fail, the issue is in the source code under `/workspace`, not in missing system packages.
1. Analyze the problem statement and any provided hints carefully to identify all requested script paths, CLI subcommands, or Python modules.
2. Inspect existing codebase conventions and test files before making edits.
3. Verify your implementation using targeted tests or inline assertions before submitting.
4. Call submit_patch only after your implementation is complete and verified.
5. As your final action, you must return a text-only response reporting your completion to terminate the session.
## Workspace Layout
The repository is located at `/workspace`. Here is the directory tree (up to 3 levels):
```
./HISTORY.md
./LICENSE
./MANIFEST.in
./Makefile
./README.md
./benchmarks
./changes
./changes/1807-xavier.md
./changes/1831-fnep.md
./changes/1895-PrettyWood.md
./changes/1983-vgerak.md
./changes/2060-uriyyo.md
./changes/2341-alecgerona.md
./changes/2375-maximberg.md
./changes/2425-Kludex.md
./changes/2447-MihanixA.md
./changes/2463-nuno-andre.md
./changes/2465-daviskirk.md
./changes/2489-koxudaxi.md
./changes/2512-sbv-csis.md
./changes/2515-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2517-peterroelants.md
./changes/2519-daviskirk.md
./changes/2524-cwe5590.md
./changes/2567-postgres-asyncpg.md
./changes/2572-paxcodes.md
./changes/2580-samuelcolvin.md
./changes/2707-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2712-RatulMaharaj.md
./changes/2718-nuno-andre.md
./changes/2719-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2724-shahriyarr.md
./changes/2733-krisaoe.md
./changes/2743-uriyyo.md
./changes/2748-uriyyo.md
./changes/2753-uriyyo.md
./changes/2760-jameysharp.md
./changes/2794-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2810-sergejkozin.md
./changes/2855-paxcodes.md
./changes/2856-paxcodes.md
./changes/2860-geekingfrog.md
./changes/2885-PrettyWood.md
./changes/2908-jrwalk.md
./changes/2913-gbdlin.md
./changes/2929-samuelcolvin.md
./changes/2936-cbartz.md
./changes/2989-hmvp.md
./changes/3008-PrettyWood.md
./changes/3018-JacobHayes.md
./changes/3038-matthewhughes934.md
./changes/3043-zulrang.md
./changes/3062-PrettyWood.md
./changes/3135-PrettyWood.md
./changes/660-daviskirk.md
./changes/README.md
./changes/make_history.py
./docs
./mkdocs.yml
./pydantic
./pydantic/__init__.py
./pydantic/_hypothesis_plugin.py
./pydantic/annotated_types.py
./pydantic/class_validators.py
./pydantic/color.py
./pydantic/config.py
./pydantic/dataclasses.py
./pydantic/datetime_parse.py
./pydantic/decorator.py
./pydantic/env_settings.py
./pydantic/error_wrappers.py
./pydantic/errors.py
./pydantic/fields.py
./pydantic/generics.py
./pydantic/json.py
./pydantic/main.py
./pydantic/mypy.py
./pydantic/networks.py
./pydantic/parse.py
./pydantic/py.typed
./pydantic/schema.py
./pydantic/tools.py
./pydantic/types.py
./pydantic/typing.py
./pydantic/utils.py
./pydantic/validators.py
./pydantic/version.py
./requirements.txt
./setup.cfg
./setup.py
./tests
```
Turn 1at 36 s327 tokens out4,043 prompt tokens
The user is reporting a bug where `extra` config is not respected for `TypedDict` when using the `validate_arguments` decorator in Pydantic.
Example provided:
```python
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
```
This should not raise a `ValidationError` when `Extra.allow` is set, but it currently does.
I need to:
1. Reproduce the bug.
2. Find the code responsible for validating `TypedDict` arguments in `validate_arguments`.
3. Fix the bug so that the `extra` config is respected.
Let's start by reproducing the bug.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom typing_extensions import TypedDict\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra\n\nclass TypedTest(TypedDict):\n y: str\n\n@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})\ndef test(other: TypedTest):\n pass\n\ntry:\n test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n print(\"Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n print(f\"Failed: {e}\")\nPY\n"
}Result of run_command 164 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "Failed: 1 validation error for Test\nother -> z\n extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 327 tokens · stopped: STOP
<|channel>thought
The user is reporting a bug where `extra` config is not respected for `TypedDict` when using the `validate_arguments` decorator in Pydantic.
Example provided:
```python
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
```
This should not raise a `ValidationError` when `Extra.allow` is set, but it currently does.
I need to:
1. Reproduce the bug.
2. Find the code responsible for validating `TypedDict` arguments in `validate_arguments`.
3. Fix the bug so that the `extra` config is respected.
Let's start by reproducing the bug.<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY'
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
try:
test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
print("Success")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Failed: {e}")
PY
<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 2at 43 s95 tokens out4,439 prompt tokens
The bug is reproduced. Now I need to find where `validate_arguments` is implemented and how it handles `TypedDict`. `validate_arguments` is likely in `pydantic/decorator.py`. Let's search for `validate_arguments` and `TypedDict` handling.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn --include=\"*.py\" \"validate_arguments\" pydantic/"
}Result of run_command 977 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "pydantic/fields.py:407: # check also `Required` because of `validate_arguments` that sets `...` as default value\npydantic/decorator.py:11:__all__ = ('validate_arguments',)\npydantic/decorator.py:21:def validate_arguments(func: None = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Callable[['AnyCallableT'], 'AnyCallableT']:\npydantic/decorator.py:26:def validate_arguments(func: 'AnyCallableT') -> 'AnyCallableT':\npydantic/decorator.py:30:def validate_arguments(func: Optional['AnyCallableT'] = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Any:\npydantic/decorator.py:69: f'are not permitted as argument names when using the \"{validate_arguments.__name__}\" decorator'\npydantic/decorator.py:218: '@validate_arguments is not yet supported, please remove.'\npydantic/__init__.py:6:from .decorator import validate_arguments\npydantic/__init__.py:35: 'validate_arguments',\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 95 tokens · stopped: STOP
The bug is reproduced. Now I need to find where `validate_arguments` is implemented and how it handles `TypedDict`.
`validate_arguments` is likely in `pydantic/decorator.py`.
Let's search for `validate_arguments` and `TypedDict` handling.<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn --include="*.py" "validate_arguments" pydantic/<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 3at 47 s49 tokens out4,841 prompt tokens
It's in `pydantic/decorator.py`. Let's examine `pydantic/decorator.py`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py"
}Result of read_file 5,804 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
"content": "from functools import wraps\nfrom typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Callable, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional, Tuple, Type, TypeVar, Union, overload\n\nfrom . import validator\nfrom .config import Extra\nfrom .errors import ConfigError\nfrom .main import BaseModel, create_model\nfrom .typing import get_all_type_hints\nfrom .utils import to_camel\n\n__all__ = ('validate_arguments',)\n\nif TYPE_CHECKING:\n from .typing import AnyCallable\n\n AnyCallableT = TypeVar('AnyCallableT', bound=AnyCallable)\n ConfigType = Union[None, Type[Any], Dict[str, Any]]\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: None = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Callable[['AnyCallableT'], 'AnyCallableT']:\n ...\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: 'AnyCallableT') -> 'AnyCallableT':\n ...\n\n\ndef validate_arguments(func: Optional['AnyCallableT'] = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Any:\n \"\"\"\n Decorator to validate the arguments passed to a function.\n \"\"\"\n\n def validate(_func: 'AnyCallable') -> 'AnyCallable':\n vd = ValidatedFunction(_func, config)\n\n @wraps(_func)\n def wrapper_function(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:\n return vd.call(*args, **kwargs)\n\n wrapper_function.vd = vd # type: ignore\n wrapper_function.validate = vd.init_model_instance # type: ignore\n wrapper_function.raw_function = vd.raw_function # type: ignore\n wrapper_function.model = vd.model # type: ignore\n return wrapper_function\n\n if func:\n return validate(func)\n else:\n return validate\n\n\nALT_V_ARGS = 'v__args'\nALT_V_KWARGS = 'v__kwargs'\nV_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME = 'v__positional_only'\nV_DUPLICATE_KWARGS = 'v__duplicate_kwargs'\n\n\nclass ValidatedFunction:\n def __init__(self, function: 'AnyCallableT', config: 'ConfigType'): # noqa C901\n from inspect import Parameter, signature\n\n parameters: Mapping[str, Parameter] = signature(function).parameters\n\n if parameters.keys() & {ALT_V_ARGS, ALT_V_KWARGS, V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME, V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS}:\n raise ConfigError(\n f'\"{ALT_V_ARGS}\", \"{ALT_V_KWARGS}\", \"{V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME}\" and \"{V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS}\" '\n f'are not permitted as argument names when using the \"{validate_arguments.__name__}\" decorator'\n )\n\n self.raw_function = function\n self.arg_mapping: Dict[int, str] = {}\n self.positional_only_args = set()\n self.v_args_name = 'args'\n self.v_kwargs_name = 'kwargs'\n\n type_hints = get_all_type_hints(function)\n takes_args = False\n takes_kwargs = False\n fields: Dict[str, Tuple[Any, Any]] = {}\n for i, (name, p) in enumerate(parameters.items()):\n if p.annotation is p.empty:\n annotation = Any\n else:\n annotation = type_hints[name]\n\n default = ... if p.default is p.empty else p.default\n if p.kind == Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY:\n self.arg_mapping[i] = name\n fields[name] = annotation, default\n fields[V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME] = List[str], None\n self.positional_only_args.add(name)\n elif p.kind == Parameter.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD:\n self.arg_mapping[i] = name\n fields[name] = annotation, default\n fields[V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS] = List[str], None\n elif p.kind == Parameter.KEYWORD_ONLY:\n fields[name] = annotation, default\n elif p.kind == Parameter.VAR_POSITIONAL:\n self.v_args_name = name\n fields[name] = Tuple[annotation, ...], None\n takes_args = True\n else:\n assert p.kind == Parameter.VAR_KEYWORD, p.kind\n self.v_kwargs_name = name\n fields[name] = Dict[str, annotation], None # type: ignore\n takes_kwargs = True\n\n # these checks avoid a clash between \"args\" and a field with that name\n if not takes_args and self.v_args_name in fields:\n self.v_args_name = ALT_V_ARGS\n\n # same with \"kwargs\"\n if not takes_kwargs and self.v_kwargs_name in fields:\n self.v_kwargs_name = ALT_V_KWARGS\n\n if not takes_args:\n # we add the field so validation below can raise the correct exception\n fields[self.v_args_name] = List[Any], None\n\n if not takes_kwargs:\n # same with kwargs\n fields[self.v_kwargs_name] = Dict[Any, Any], None\n\n self.create_model(fields, takes_args, takes_kwargs, config)\n\n def init_model_instance(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> BaseModel:\n values = self.build_values(args, kwargs)\n return self.model(**values)\n\n def call(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:\n m = self.init_model_instance(*args, **kwargs)\n return self.execute(m)\n\n def build_values(self, args: Tuple[Any, ...], kwargs: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:\n values: Dict[str, Any] = {}\n if args:\n arg_iter = enumerate(args)\n while True:\n try:\n i, a = next(arg_iter)\n except StopIteration:\n break\n arg_name = self.arg_mapping.get(i)\n if arg_name is not None:\n values[arg_name] = a\n else:\n values[self.v_args_name] = [a] + [a for _, a in arg_iter]\n break",
"start_line": 1,
"end_line": 150,
"total_lines": 259,
"is_truncated": true
}Generated tokens 49 tokens · stopped: STOP
It's in `pydantic/decorator.py`. Let's examine `pydantic/decorator.py`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/decorator.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 4at 51 s60 tokens out6,621 prompt tokens
I need to read the rest of `pydantic/decorator.py`, especially `create_model` and `build_values`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
"start_line\"": 151
}Result of read_file 5,804 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
"content": "from functools import wraps\nfrom typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Callable, Dict, List, Mapping, Optional, Tuple, Type, TypeVar, Union, overload\n\nfrom . import validator\nfrom .config import Extra\nfrom .errors import ConfigError\nfrom .main import BaseModel, create_model\nfrom .typing import get_all_type_hints\nfrom .utils import to_camel\n\n__all__ = ('validate_arguments',)\n\nif TYPE_CHECKING:\n from .typing import AnyCallable\n\n AnyCallableT = TypeVar('AnyCallableT', bound=AnyCallable)\n ConfigType = Union[None, Type[Any], Dict[str, Any]]\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: None = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Callable[['AnyCallableT'], 'AnyCallableT']:\n ...\n\n\n@overload\ndef validate_arguments(func: 'AnyCallableT') -> 'AnyCallableT':\n ...\n\n\ndef validate_arguments(func: Optional['AnyCallableT'] = None, *, config: 'ConfigType' = None) -> Any:\n \"\"\"\n Decorator to validate the arguments passed to a function.\n \"\"\"\n\n def validate(_func: 'AnyCallable') -> 'AnyCallable':\n vd = ValidatedFunction(_func, config)\n\n @wraps(_func)\n def wrapper_function(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:\n return vd.call(*args, **kwargs)\n\n wrapper_function.vd = vd # type: ignore\n wrapper_function.validate = vd.init_model_instance # type: ignore\n wrapper_function.raw_function = vd.raw_function # type: ignore\n wrapper_function.model = vd.model # type: ignore\n return wrapper_function\n\n if func:\n return validate(func)\n else:\n return validate\n\n\nALT_V_ARGS = 'v__args'\nALT_V_KWARGS = 'v__kwargs'\nV_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME = 'v__positional_only'\nV_DUPLICATE_KWARGS = 'v__duplicate_kwargs'\n\n\nclass ValidatedFunction:\n def __init__(self, function: 'AnyCallableT', config: 'ConfigType'): # noqa C901\n from inspect import Parameter, signature\n\n parameters: Mapping[str, Parameter] = signature(function).parameters\n\n if parameters.keys() & {ALT_V_ARGS, ALT_V_KWARGS, V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME, V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS}:\n raise ConfigError(\n f'\"{ALT_V_ARGS}\", \"{ALT_V_KWARGS}\", \"{V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME}\" and \"{V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS}\" '\n f'are not permitted as argument names when using the \"{validate_arguments.__name__}\" decorator'\n )\n\n self.raw_function = function\n self.arg_mapping: Dict[int, str] = {}\n self.positional_only_args = set()\n self.v_args_name = 'args'\n self.v_kwargs_name = 'kwargs'\n\n type_hints = get_all_type_hints(function)\n takes_args = False\n takes_kwargs = False\n fields: Dict[str, Tuple[Any, Any]] = {}\n for i, (name, p) in enumerate(parameters.items()):\n if p.annotation is p.empty:\n annotation = Any\n else:\n annotation = type_hints[name]\n\n default = ... if p.default is p.empty else p.default\n if p.kind == Parameter.POSITIONAL_ONLY:\n self.arg_mapping[i] = name\n fields[name] = annotation, default\n fields[V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME] = List[str], None\n self.positional_only_args.add(name)\n elif p.kind == Parameter.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD:\n self.arg_mapping[i] = name\n fields[name] = annotation, default\n fields[V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS] = List[str], None\n elif p.kind == Parameter.KEYWORD_ONLY:\n fields[name] = annotation, default\n elif p.kind == Parameter.VAR_POSITIONAL:\n self.v_args_name = name\n fields[name] = Tuple[annotation, ...], None\n takes_args = True\n else:\n assert p.kind == Parameter.VAR_KEYWORD, p.kind\n self.v_kwargs_name = name\n fields[name] = Dict[str, annotation], None # type: ignore\n takes_kwargs = True\n\n # these checks avoid a clash between \"args\" and a field with that name\n if not takes_args and self.v_args_name in fields:\n self.v_args_name = ALT_V_ARGS\n\n # same with \"kwargs\"\n if not takes_kwargs and self.v_kwargs_name in fields:\n self.v_kwargs_name = ALT_V_KWARGS\n\n if not takes_args:\n # we add the field so validation below can raise the correct exception\n fields[self.v_args_name] = List[Any], None\n\n if not takes_kwargs:\n # same with kwargs\n fields[self.v_kwargs_name] = Dict[Any, Any], None\n\n self.create_model(fields, takes_args, takes_kwargs, config)\n\n def init_model_instance(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> BaseModel:\n values = self.build_values(args, kwargs)\n return self.model(**values)\n\n def call(self, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any:\n m = self.init_model_instance(*args, **kwargs)\n return self.execute(m)\n\n def build_values(self, args: Tuple[Any, ...], kwargs: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:\n values: Dict[str, Any] = {}\n if args:\n arg_iter = enumerate(args)\n while True:\n try:\n i, a = next(arg_iter)\n except StopIteration:\n break\n arg_name = self.arg_mapping.get(i)\n if arg_name is not None:\n values[arg_name] = a\n else:\n values[self.v_args_name] = [a] + [a for _, a in arg_iter]\n break",
"start_line": 1,
"end_line": 150,
"total_lines": 259,
"is_truncated": true
}Generated tokens 60 tokens · stopped: STOP
I need to read the rest of `pydantic/decorator.py`, especially `create_model` and `build_values`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/decorator.py<|"|>,start_line": 151}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 5at 64 s158 tokens out8,411 prompt tokens
I messed up the `read_file` call. I requested `start_line":151` but I didn't use a dictionary for `read_file` args properly or the API call was weirdly formatted in my thought process. Wait, the response I got shows it just read the first 150 lines again. My previous `read_file` call was: `read_file(filepath="pydantic/decorator.py", start_line=151)` But it seems I didn't actually pass it correctly in the tool call. Let me try again.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
"start_line": 151
}Result of read_file 4,774 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pydantic/decorator.py",
"content": "\n var_kwargs = {}\n wrong_positional_args = []\n duplicate_kwargs = []\n non_var_fields = set(self.model.__fields__) - {self.v_args_name, self.v_kwargs_name}\n for k, v in kwargs.items():\n if k in non_var_fields:\n if k in self.positional_only_args:\n wrong_positional_args.append(k)\n if k in values:\n duplicate_kwargs.append(k)\n values[k] = v\n else:\n var_kwargs[k] = v\n\n if var_kwargs:\n values[self.v_kwargs_name] = var_kwargs\n if wrong_positional_args:\n values[V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME] = wrong_positional_args\n if duplicate_kwargs:\n values[V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS] = duplicate_kwargs\n return values\n\n def execute(self, m: BaseModel) -> Any:\n d = {k: v for k, v in m._iter() if k in m.__fields_set__ or m.__fields__[k].default_factory}\n var_kwargs = d.pop(self.v_kwargs_name, {})\n\n if self.v_args_name in d:\n args_: List[Any] = []\n in_kwargs = False\n kwargs = {}\n for name, value in d.items():\n if in_kwargs:\n kwargs[name] = value\n elif name == self.v_args_name:\n args_ += value\n in_kwargs = True\n else:\n args_.append(value)\n return self.raw_function(*args_, **kwargs, **var_kwargs)\n elif self.positional_only_args:\n args_ = []\n kwargs = {}\n for name, value in d.items():\n if name in self.positional_only_args:\n args_.append(value)\n else:\n kwargs[name] = value\n return self.raw_function(*args_, **kwargs, **var_kwargs)\n else:\n return self.raw_function(**d, **var_kwargs)\n\n def create_model(self, fields: Dict[str, Any], takes_args: bool, takes_kwargs: bool, config: 'ConfigType') -> None:\n pos_args = len(self.arg_mapping)\n\n class CustomConfig:\n pass\n\n if not TYPE_CHECKING: # pragma: no branch\n if isinstance(config, dict):\n CustomConfig = type('Config', (), config) # noqa: F811\n elif config is not None:\n CustomConfig = config # noqa: F811\n\n if hasattr(CustomConfig, 'fields') or hasattr(CustomConfig, 'alias_generator'):\n raise ConfigError(\n 'Setting the \"fields\" and \"alias_generator\" property on custom Config for '\n '@validate_arguments is not yet supported, please remove.'\n )\n\n class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):\n @validator(self.v_args_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n def check_args(cls, v: Optional[List[Any]]) -> Optional[List[Any]]:\n if takes_args or v is None:\n return v\n\n raise TypeError(f'{pos_args} positional arguments expected but {pos_args + len(v)} given')\n\n @validator(self.v_kwargs_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n def check_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:\n if takes_kwargs or v is None:\n return v\n\n plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'\n keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v.keys()))\n raise TypeError(f'unexpected keyword argument{plural}: {keys}')\n\n @validator(V_POSITIONAL_ONLY_NAME, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n def check_positional_only(cls, v: Optional[List[str]]) -> None:\n if v is None:\n return\n\n plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'\n keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v))\n raise TypeError(f'positional-only argument{plural} passed as keyword argument{plural}: {keys}')\n\n @validator(V_DUPLICATE_KWARGS, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)\n def check_duplicate_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[List[str]]) -> None:\n if v is None:\n return\n\n plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'\n keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v))\n raise TypeError(f'multiple values for argument{plural}: {keys}')\n\n class Config(CustomConfig):\n extra = Extra.forbid\n\n self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)",
"start_line": 151,
"end_line": 259,
"total_lines": 259,
"is_truncated": false
}Generated tokens 158 tokens · stopped: STOP
I messed up the `read_file` call. I requested `start_line":151` but I didn't use a dictionary for `read_file` args properly or the API call was weirdly formatted in my thought process. Wait, the response I got shows it just read the first 150 lines again.
My previous `read_file` call was:
`read_file(filepath="pydantic/decorator.py", start_line=151)`
But it seems I didn't actually pass it correctly in the tool call. Let me try again.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/decorator.py<|"|>,start_line:151}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 6at 109 s702 tokens out9,920 prompt tokens
Okay, I see how it works. `validate_arguments` creates a `DecoratorBaseModel` and then uses `create_model` to create a model with the function fields.
The `DecoratorBaseModel` has a `Config` class:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
This `extra = Extra.forbid` is probably what's causing the issue. It seems to be overriding the `CustomConfig` if `CustomConfig` also has an `extra` attribute, or it set it to `Extra.forbid` by default.
Wait, `class Config(CustomConfig):` inherits from `CustomConfig`, which is created from the `config` argument passed to `validate_arguments`.
If `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`.
But then `class Config(CustomConfig):` explicitly defines `extra = Extra.forbid`. This will override `Extra.allow`.
Let's check if `TypedDict` is handled specially. The user is passing a `TypedDict` as a type hint for an argument.
```python
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
```
In this case, `fields` will contain `{'other': (TypedTest, ...)}`.
`create_model` will create a model where one of the fields is of type `TypedTest`.
When `test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})` is called, `DecoratorBaseModel` (or rather the model created by `create_model`) will validate the `other` argument. Since `other` is a `TypedDict`, Pydantic's validation for `TypedDict` is used.
Wait, if `other` is a `TypedDict`, it's the *content* of the `TypedDict` that's being validated. The `Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` affects the *arguments* of the function (the model's fields), not the *fields of the TypedDict* inside the argument.
Wait, if I call `test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})`, the model created by `create_model` will have a field `other` with type `TypedTest`.
The dictionary `{'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}` is being validated against `TypedTest`.
If `TypedDict` validation is used, it should respect the config of the model it's part of? Or does `TypedDict` have its own way of handling extra fields?
In Pydantic v1 (which this is, 1.8.2), `TypedDict` validation is handled in `pydantic/main.py` or `pydantic/parse.py` or `pydantic/typing.py`.
Let's see how `TypedDict` is validated. I'll search for `TypedDict` in the codebase.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn --include=\"*.py\" \"TypedDict\" pydantic/"
}Result of run_command 1,742 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "pydantic/error_wrappers.py:8: from typing_extensions import TypedDict\npydantic/error_wrappers.py:16: class _ErrorDictRequired(TypedDict):\npydantic/networks.py:34: from typing_extensions import TypedDict\npydantic/networks.py:42: class Parts(TypedDict, total=False):\npydantic/annotated_types.py:7: from typing_extensions import TypedDict\npydantic/annotated_types.py:11: # Mypy bug: `Type[TypedDict]` is resolved as `Any` https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/11030\npydantic/annotated_types.py:12: typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], # type: ignore[valid-type]\npydantic/annotated_types.py:16: Create a `BaseModel` based on the fields of a `TypedDict`.\npydantic/annotated_types.py:17: Since `typing.TypedDict` in Python 3.8 does not store runtime information about optional keys,\npydantic/annotated_types.py:22: # Best case scenario: with python 3.9+ or when `TypedDict` is imported from `typing_extensions`\npydantic/annotated_types.py:25: 'You should use `typing_extensions.TypedDict` instead of `typing.TypedDict`. '\npydantic/validators.py:46: from typing_extensions import Literal, TypedDict\npydantic/validators.py:581: typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig'] # type: ignore[valid-type]\npydantic/validators.py:585: TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(\npydantic/validators.py:590: typeddict_cls.__pydantic_model__ = TypedDictModel # type: ignore[attr-defined]\npydantic/validators.py:592: def typeddict_validator(values: 'TypedDict') -> Dict[str, Any]: # type: ignore[valid-type]\npydantic/validators.py:593: return TypedDictModel.parse_obj(values).dict(exclude_unset=True)\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 702 tokens · stopped: STOP
Okay, I see how it works. `validate_arguments` creates a `DecoratorBaseModel` and then uses `create_model` to create a model with the function fields.
The `DecoratorBaseModel` has a `Config` class:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
This `extra = Extra.forbid` is probably what's causing the issue. It seems to be overriding the `CustomConfig` if `CustomConfig` also has an `extra` attribute, or it set it to `Extra.forbid` by default.
Wait, `class Config(CustomConfig):` inherits from `CustomConfig`, which is created from the `config` argument passed to `validate_arguments`.
If `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`.
But then `class Config(CustomConfig):` explicitly defines `extra = Extra.forbid`. This will override `Extra.allow`.
Let's check if `TypedDict` is handled specially. The user is passing a `TypedDict` as a type hint for an argument.
```python
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
```
In this case, `fields` will contain `{'other': (TypedTest, ...)}`.
`create_model` will create a model where one of the fields is of type `TypedTest`.
When `test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})` is called, `DecoratorBaseModel` (or rather the model created by `create_model`) will validate the `other` argument. Since `other` is a `TypedDict`, Pydantic's validation for `TypedDict` is used.
Wait, if `other` is a `TypedDict`, it's the *content* of the `TypedDict` that's being validated. The `Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` affects the *arguments* of the function (the model's fields), not the *fields of the TypedDict* inside the argument.
Wait, if I call `test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})`, the model created by `create_model` will have a field `other` with type `TypedTest`.
The dictionary `{'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}` is being validated against `TypedTest`.
If `TypedDict` validation is used, it should respect the config of the model it's part of? Or does `TypedDict` have its own way of handling extra fields?
In Pydantic v1 (which this is, 1.8.2), `TypedDict` validation is handled in `pydantic/main.py` or `pydantic/parse.py` or `pydantic/typing.py`.
Let's see how `TypedDict` is validated. I'll search for `TypedDict` in the codebase.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn --include="*.py" "TypedDict" pydantic/<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 7at 112 s79 tokens out11,205 prompt tokens
It seems `pydantic/validators.py` has `typeddict_validator` and `create_model_from_typeddict`. Let's examine `pydantic/validators.py`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -n \"create_model_from_typeddict\" pydantic/validators.py"
}Result of run_command 181 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "583: from .annotated_types import create_model_from_typeddict\n585: TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 79 tokens · stopped: STOP
It seems `pydantic/validators.py` has `typeddict_validator` and `create_model_from_typeddict`.
Let's examine `pydantic/validators.py`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -n "create_model_from_typeddict" pydantic/validators.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 8at 115 s50 tokens out11,363 prompt tokens
It's imported from `pydantic/annotated_types.py`. Let's look at that.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"filepath": "pydantic/annotated_types.py"
}Result of read_file 2,590 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pydantic/annotated_types.py",
"content": "from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Dict, FrozenSet, NamedTuple, Type\n\nfrom .fields import Required\nfrom .main import BaseModel, create_model\n\nif TYPE_CHECKING:\n from typing_extensions import TypedDict\n\n\ndef create_model_from_typeddict(\n # Mypy bug: `Type[TypedDict]` is resolved as `Any` https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/11030\n typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], # type: ignore[valid-type]\n **kwargs: Any,\n) -> Type['BaseModel']:\n \"\"\"\n Create a `BaseModel` based on the fields of a `TypedDict`.\n Since `typing.TypedDict` in Python 3.8 does not store runtime information about optional keys,\n we raise an error if this happens (see https://bugs.python.org/issue38834).\n \"\"\"\n field_definitions: Dict[str, Any]\n\n # Best case scenario: with python 3.9+ or when `TypedDict` is imported from `typing_extensions`\n if not hasattr(typeddict_cls, '__required_keys__'):\n raise TypeError(\n 'You should use `typing_extensions.TypedDict` instead of `typing.TypedDict`. '\n 'Without it, there is no way to differentiate required and optional fields when subclassed.'\n )\n\n required_keys: FrozenSet[str] = typeddict_cls.__required_keys__ # type: ignore[attr-defined]\n field_definitions = {\n field_name: (field_type, Required if field_name in required_keys else None)\n for field_name, field_type in typeddict_cls.__annotations__.items()\n }\n\n return create_model(typeddict_cls.__name__, **kwargs, **field_definitions)\n\n\ndef create_model_from_namedtuple(namedtuple_cls: Type['NamedTuple'], **kwargs: Any) -> Type['BaseModel']:\n \"\"\"\n Create a `BaseModel` based on the fields of a named tuple.\n A named tuple can be created with `typing.NamedTuple` and declared annotations\n but also with `collections.namedtuple`, in this case we consider all fields\n to have type `Any`.\n \"\"\"\n # With python 3.10+, `__annotations__` always exists but can be empty hence the `getattr... or...` logic\n namedtuple_annotations: Dict[str, Type[Any]] = getattr(namedtuple_cls, '__annotations__', None) or {\n k: Any for k in namedtuple_cls._fields\n }\n field_definitions: Dict[str, Any] = {\n field_name: (field_type, Required) for field_name, field_type in namedtuple_annotations.items()\n }\n return create_model(namedtuple_cls.__name__, **kwargs, **field_definitions)",
"start_line": 1,
"end_line": 52,
"total_lines": 52,
"is_truncated": false
}Generated tokens 50 tokens · stopped: STOP
It's imported from `pydantic/annotated_types.py`. Let's look at that.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/annotated_types.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 9at 120 s100 tokens out12,197 prompt tokens
So `create_model_from_typeddict` just calls `create_model(typeddict_cls.__name__, **kwargs, **field_definitions)`. Now let's look at how `typeddict_validator` in `pydantic/validators.py` uses it.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"end_line": 600,
"filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
"start_line": 580
}Result of read_file 961 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
"content": "def make_typeddict_validator(\n typeddict_cls: Type['TypedDict'], config: Type['BaseConfig'] # type: ignore[valid-type]\n) -> Callable[[Any], Dict[str, Any]]:\n from .annotated_types import create_model_from_typeddict\n\n TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(\n typeddict_cls,\n __config__=config,\n __module__=typeddict_cls.__module__,\n )\n typeddict_cls.__pydantic_model__ = TypedDictModel # type: ignore[attr-defined]\n\n def typeddict_validator(values: 'TypedDict') -> Dict[str, Any]: # type: ignore[valid-type]\n return TypedDictModel.parse_obj(values).dict(exclude_unset=True)\n\n return typeddict_validator\n\n\nclass IfConfig:\n def __init__(self, validator: AnyCallable, *config_attr_names: str) -> None:\n self.validator = validator",
"start_line": 580,
"end_line": 600,
"total_lines": 723,
"is_truncated": false
}Generated tokens 100 tokens · stopped: STOP
So `create_model_from_typeddict` just calls `create_model(typeddict_cls.__name__, **kwargs, **field_definitions)`.
Now let's look at how `typeddict_validator` in `pydantic/validators.py` uses it.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pydantic/validators.py<|"|>,start_line:580,end_line:600}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 10at 127 s117 tokens out12,622 prompt tokens
The `make_typeddict_validator` function takes `config` and passes it as `__config__` to `create_model_from_typeddict`. Wait, look at `make_typeddict_validator` carefully. It's not called `typeddict_validator` but `make_typeddict_validator`. Let's see where `make_typeddict_validator` is called.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn \"make_typeddict_validator\" pydantic/"
}Result of run_command 200 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "pydantic/validators.py:580:def make_typeddict_validator(\npydantic/validators.py:696: yield make_typeddict_validator(type_, config)\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 117 tokens · stopped: STOP
The `make_typeddict_validator` function takes `config` and passes it as `__config__` to `create_model_from_typeddict`.
Wait, look at `make_typeddict_validator` carefully. It's not called `typeddict_validator` but `make_typeddict_validator`.
Let's see where `make_typeddict_validator` is called.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn "make_typeddict_validator" pydantic/<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 11at 131 s66 tokens out12,823 prompt tokens
It is called in `pydantic/validators.py` on line 696. Let's see the context.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"end_line": 710,
"filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
"start_line": 680
}Result of read_file 1,052 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pydantic/validators.py",
"content": " yield make_literal_validator(type_)\n return\n if is_builtin_dataclass(type_):\n yield from make_dataclass_validator(type_, config)\n return\n if type_ is Enum:\n yield enum_validator\n return\n if type_ is IntEnum:\n yield int_enum_validator\n return\n if is_namedtuple(type_):\n yield tuple_validator\n yield make_namedtuple_validator(type_)\n return\n if is_typeddict(type_):\n yield make_typeddict_validator(type_, config)\n return\n\n class_ = get_class(type_)\n if class_ is not None:\n if isinstance(class_, type):\n yield make_class_validator(class_)\n else:\n yield any_class_validator\n return\n\n for val_type, validators in _VALIDATORS:\n try:\n if issubclass(type_, val_type):\n for v in validators:",
"start_line": 680,
"end_line": 710,
"total_lines": 723,
"is_truncated": false
}Generated tokens 66 tokens · stopped: STOP
It is called in `pydantic/validators.py` on line 696. Let's see the context.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{end_line:710,filepath:<|"|>pydantic/validators.py<|"|>,start_line:680}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 12at 215 s1,360 tokens out13,215 prompt tokens
This looks like it's part of some validator generation logic.
Let's go back to `pydantic/decorator.py`.
`validate_arguments` creates a `DecoratorBaseModel` with `extra = Extra.forbid`.
And then it uses `create_model` to create the final model.
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...Validators...
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)
```
When `self.model(**values)` is called, Pydantic validates `values` using the model.
If `values` contains an argument `other` of type `TypedTest`, Pydantic's internal machinery will use a validator for `TypedTest`.
The `TypedTest` validator is created via `make_typeddict_validator(type_, config)`.
The `config` passed here is the config of the model being validated.
In our case, the model is `self.model`, and its config is `DecoratorBaseModel.Config`.
And `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` has `extra = Extra.forbid`.
So the `TypedDictModel` created inside `make_typeddict_validator` will also have `extra = Extra.forbid`.
Wait, `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` is:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
`CustomConfig` is created from the `config` passed to `validate_arguments`.
If the user passes `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`.
BUT, `Config` inherits from `CustomConfig` and overrides `extra` to be `Extra.forbid`.
So `DecoratorBaseModel.Config.extra` is always `Extra.forbid`, regardless of what the user passed to `validate_arguments`.
This is exactly the bug! The `extra = Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel` is too aggressive. It should respect `CustomConfig.extra` if it's defined.
Let's verify this.
If I change:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
to something that respects `CustomConfig.extra`, for example:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
Wait, you can't do `if` statements inside a class definition for attributes like that and expect them to work as class attributes in the way I'm thinking.
Actually, if `CustomConfig` is a class and it has `extra`, then `Config(CustomConfig)` will inherit it.
The problem is that `extra = Extra.forbid` is explicitly declared in `Config`, so it overrides whatever is in `CustomConfig`.
If we want to provide a default of `Extra.forbid` but allow `CustomConfig` to override it, we should check if `CustomConfig` already has `extra`.
`CustomConfig` is either:
1. `type('Config', (), config)` where `config` is a dict.
2. `config` which is a class.
3. `Config` (the empty class if `config` is None).
If `config` is `{'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` will have `extra = Extra.allow`.
If we want the default to be `Extra.forbid` when not specified, we could do:
```python
# Instead of:
# class Config(CustomConfig):
# extra = Extra.forbid
# We could do:
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
if not hasattr(Config, 'extra'):
Config.extra = Extra.forbid
```
Wait, `DecoratorBaseModel` is defined inside `create_model`.
Let's see if there's a better way.
What if we just don't set `extra = Extra.forbid` if it's already in `CustomConfig`?
```python
# In create_model method of ValidatedFunction
```
Let's look at the code again.
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
If we change it to:
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
```
And then:
```python
if not hasattr(DecoratorBaseModel.Config, 'extra'):
DecoratorBaseModel.Config.extra = Extra.forbid
```
However, `DecoratorBaseModel` is defined inside `create_model`.
Wait, maybe we can just do this:
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
```
But if we do that, and `CustomConfig` doesn't have `extra`, then the default is `Extra.ignore` (Pydantic default).
But the current implementation *wants* `Extra.forbid` as the default for `validate_arguments`.
Why does it want `Extra.forbid`?
Because `validate_arguments` is used to validate function arguments. If you pass an extra argument to the function that's not in the signature, Pydantic should probably complain.
Wait, if I use `@validate_arguments` (without `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`), and I pass an extra argument to the function, does it complain?
Let's test.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments\n\n@validate_arguments\ndef test(x: int):\n pass\n\ntry:\n test(x=1, y=2)\n print(\"Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n print(f\"Failed: {e}\")\nPY\n"
}Result of run_command 159 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "Failed: 1 validation error for Test\nkwargs\n unexpected keyword argument: 'y' (type=type_error)\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 1,360 tokens · stopped: STOP
This looks like it's part of some validator generation logic.
Let's go back to `pydantic/decorator.py`.
`validate_arguments` creates a `DecoratorBaseModel` with `extra = Extra.forbid`.
And then it uses `create_model` to create the final model.
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...Validators...
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)
```
When `self.model(**values)` is called, Pydantic validates `values` using the model.
If `values` contains an argument `other` of type `TypedTest`, Pydantic's internal machinery will use a validator for `TypedTest`.
The `TypedTest` validator is created via `make_typeddict_validator(type_, config)`.
The `config` passed here is the config of the model being validated.
In our case, the model is `self.model`, and its config is `DecoratorBaseModel.Config`.
And `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` has `extra = Extra.forbid`.
So the `TypedDictModel` created inside `make_typeddict_validator` will also have `extra = Extra.forbid`.
Wait, `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` is:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
`CustomConfig` is created from the `config` passed to `validate_arguments`.
If the user passes `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` has `extra = Extra.allow`.
BUT, `Config` inherits from `CustomConfig` and overrides `extra` to be `Extra.forbid`.
So `DecoratorBaseModel.Config.extra` is always `Extra.forbid`, regardless of what the user passed to `validate_arguments`.
This is exactly the bug! The `extra = Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel` is too aggressive. It should respect `CustomConfig.extra` if it's defined.
Let's verify this.
If I change:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
to something that respects `CustomConfig.extra`, for example:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
if not hasattr(CustomConfig, 'extra'):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
Wait, you can't do `if` statements inside a class definition for attributes like that and expect them to work as class attributes in the way I'm thinking.
Actually, if `CustomConfig` is a class and it has `extra`, then `Config(CustomConfig)` will inherit it.
The problem is that `extra = Extra.forbid` is explicitly declared in `Config`, so it overrides whatever is in `CustomConfig`.
If we want to provide a default of `Extra.forbid` but allow `CustomConfig` to override it, we should check if `CustomConfig` already has `extra`.
`CustomConfig` is either:
1. `type('Config', (), config)` where `config` is a dict.
2. `config` which is a class.
3. `Config` (the empty class if `config` is None).
If `config` is `{'extra': Extra.allow}`, then `CustomConfig` will have `extra = Extra.allow`.
If we want the default to be `Extra.forbid` when not specified, we could do:
```python
# Instead of:
# class Config(CustomConfig):
# extra = Extra.forbid
# We could do:
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
if not hasattr(Config, 'extra'):
Config.extra = Extra.forbid
```
Wait, `DecoratorBaseModel` is defined inside `create_model`.
Let's see if there's a better way.
What if we just don't set `extra = Extra.forbid` if it's already in `CustomConfig`?
```python
# In create_model method of ValidatedFunction
```
Let's look at the code again.
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
If we change it to:
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
```
And then:
```python
if not hasattr(DecoratorBaseModel.Config, 'extra'):
DecoratorBaseModel.Config.extra = Extra.forbid
```
However, `DecoratorBaseModel` is defined inside `create_model`.
Wait, maybe we can just do this:
```python
class DecoratorBaseModel(BaseModel):
# ...
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
```
But if we do that, and `CustomConfig` doesn't have `extra`, then the default is `Extra.ignore` (Pydantic default).
But the current implementation *wants* `Extra.forbid` as the default for `validate_arguments`.
Why does it want `Extra.forbid`?
Because `validate_arguments` is used to validate function arguments. If you pass an extra argument to the function that's not in the signature, Pydantic should probably complain.
Wait, if I use `@validate_arguments` (without `config={'extra': Extra.allow}`), and I pass an extra argument to the function, does it complain?
Let's test.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY'
from pydantic import validate_arguments
@validate_arguments
def test(x: int):
pass
try:
test(x=1, y=2)
print("Success")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Failed: {e}")
PY
<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 13at 316 s1,520 tokens out14,642 prompt tokens
Wait, the error message is `unexpected keyword argument: 'y' (type=type_error)`.
This comes from the `check_kwargs` validator in `DecoratorBaseModel`:
```python
@validator(self.v_kwargs_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)
def check_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
if takes_kwargs or v is None:
return v
plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'
keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v.keys()))
raise TypeError(f'unexpected keyword argument{plural}: {keys}')
```
This is NOT `Extra.forbid` in action. This is a custom validator for the `kwargs` field of the generated model.
Remember how `ValidatedFunction` works:
It creates a model where:
- Each function argument is a field.
- There's a field `v_kwargs_name` (default `'kwargs'`) which stores all extra keyword arguments.
- There's a field `v_args_name` (default `'args'`) which stores all extra positional arguments.
In the case of `test(x=1, y=2)`, `x` is a field, and `y` goes into the `kwargs` field.
The `check_kwargs` validator then checks if `takes_kwargs` is true. If not, it raises `TypeError`.
So the `extra = Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` is NOT for the function arguments themselves (because they are handled by these custom validators), but for the fields of the model created by `create_model(..., __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)`.
Wait, `self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)`
The fields of `self.model` are the function arguments PLUS `args` and `kwargs` (and `v_positional_only_name`, etc.).
If `Extra.forbid` is set, then any field NOT in the model will cause a `ValidationError`.
But the `kwargs` field is part of the model! So any extra keyword arguments passed to the function end up in the `kwargs` field of the model.
So why does the user get `extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)`?
User's code:
```python
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
```
Here, `test` has one argument `other`.
The model created by `validate_arguments` has fields `other`, `args`, `kwargs`, etc.
`test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})` is called.
The model is instantiated with `other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}`.
`other` is a field of type `TypedTest`.
Pydantic validates `{'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}` against `TypedTest`.
As we saw, `TypedDict` is validated by creating a temporary model from it using `create_model_from_typeddict`.
And `make_typeddict_validator` passes the config of the parent model to this temporary model.
```python
TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(
typeddict_cls,
__config__=config,
__module__=typeddict_cls.__module__,
)
```
And the parent model (`self.model`) has `config = DecoratorBaseModel.Config`.
And `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` has `extra = Extra.forbid`.
So `TypedDictModel` also has `extra = Extra.forbid`.
And when `{'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}` is validated against `TypedDictModel`, and `z` is an extra field, it raises `value_error.extra`.
So the fix is indeed to make sure `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` doesn't unconditionally set `extra = Extra.forbid` if the user provided a configuration.
Wait, if I remove `extra = Extra.forbid` from `DecoratorBaseModel.Config`, does it break anything?
The function arguments themselves are already validated by `check_args` and `check_kwargs` validators.
So we don't need `Extra.forbid` to catch extra arguments to the function.
But maybe `Extra.forbid` is used for something else?
Let's see where `DecoratorBaseModel` is used. It's only used within `ValidatedFunction.create_model`.
If we remove `extra = Extra.forbid`, what is the default? `Extra.ignore`.
If `Extra.ignore` is used, then `typeddict_validator` will use `Extra.ignore` (if the user didn't specify anything), which means extra fields in `TypedDict` will be ignored. This is the default behavior of `TypedDict` in Python.
But if the user specifies `Extra.forbid` in `validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.forbid})`, it should be respected.
And if they specify `Extra.allow`, it should be respected.
So the problem is:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
This ALWAYS sets `extra` to `Extra.forbid`, overriding `CustomConfig`.
If we change it to:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
```
Then:
1. If `CustomConfig` has `extra`, it is used.
2. If `CustomConfig` does NOT have `extra`, it uses `BaseModel`'s default (`Extra.ignore`).
But Pydantic's `validate_arguments` seems to want `Extra.forbid` as the default.
Wait, let me check if I'm right about that. If I don't provide `config`, does `validate_arguments` use `Extra.forbid` for its sub-models (like `TypedDict` arguments)?
Let's test.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom typing_extensions import TypedDict\nfrom pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra\n\nclass TypedTest(TypedDict):\n y: str\n\n@validate_arguments\ndef test(other: TypedTest):\n pass\n\ntry:\n test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})\n print(\"Success\")\nexcept Exception as e:\n print(f\"Failed: {e}\")\nPY\n"
}Result of run_command 164 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "Failed: 1 validation error for Test\nother -> z\n extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 1,520 tokens · stopped: STOP
Wait, the error message is `unexpected keyword argument: 'y' (type=type_error)`.
This comes from the `check_kwargs` validator in `DecoratorBaseModel`:
```python
@validator(self.v_kwargs_name, check_fields=False, allow_reuse=True)
def check_kwargs(cls, v: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
if takes_kwargs or v is None:
return v
plural = '' if len(v) == 1 else 's'
keys = ', '.join(map(repr, v.keys()))
raise TypeError(f'unexpected keyword argument{plural}: {keys}')
```
This is NOT `Extra.forbid` in action. This is a custom validator for the `kwargs` field of the generated model.
Remember how `ValidatedFunction` works:
It creates a model where:
- Each function argument is a field.
- There's a field `v_kwargs_name` (default `'kwargs'`) which stores all extra keyword arguments.
- There's a field `v_args_name` (default `'args'`) which stores all extra positional arguments.
In the case of `test(x=1, y=2)`, `x` is a field, and `y` goes into the `kwargs` field.
The `check_kwargs` validator then checks if `takes_kwargs` is true. If not, it raises `TypeError`.
So the `extra = Extra.forbid` in `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` is NOT for the function arguments themselves (because they are handled by these custom validators), but for the fields of the model created by `create_model(..., __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)`.
Wait, `self.model = create_model(to_camel(self.raw_function.__name__), __base__=DecoratorBaseModel, **fields)`
The fields of `self.model` are the function arguments PLUS `args` and `kwargs` (and `v_positional_only_name`, etc.).
If `Extra.forbid` is set, then any field NOT in the model will cause a `ValidationError`.
But the `kwargs` field is part of the model! So any extra keyword arguments passed to the function end up in the `kwargs` field of the model.
So why does the user get `extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)`?
User's code:
```python
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.allow})
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
```
Here, `test` has one argument `other`.
The model created by `validate_arguments` has fields `other`, `args`, `kwargs`, etc.
`test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})` is called.
The model is instantiated with `other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}`.
`other` is a field of type `TypedTest`.
Pydantic validates `{'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}` against `TypedTest`.
As we saw, `TypedDict` is validated by creating a temporary model from it using `create_model_from_typeddict`.
And `make_typeddict_validator` passes the config of the parent model to this temporary model.
```python
TypedDictModel = create_model_from_typeddict(
typeddict_cls,
__config__=config,
__module__=typeddict_cls.__module__,
)
```
And the parent model (`self.model`) has `config = DecoratorBaseModel.Config`.
And `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` has `extra = Extra.forbid`.
So `TypedDictModel` also has `extra = Extra.forbid`.
And when `{'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'}` is validated against `TypedDictModel`, and `z` is an extra field, it raises `value_error.extra`.
So the fix is indeed to make sure `DecoratorBaseModel.Config` doesn't unconditionally set `extra = Extra.forbid` if the user provided a configuration.
Wait, if I remove `extra = Extra.forbid` from `DecoratorBaseModel.Config`, does it break anything?
The function arguments themselves are already validated by `check_args` and `check_kwargs` validators.
So we don't need `Extra.forbid` to catch extra arguments to the function.
But maybe `Extra.forbid` is used for something else?
Let's see where `DecoratorBaseModel` is used. It's only used within `ValidatedFunction.create_model`.
If we remove `extra = Extra.forbid`, what is the default? `Extra.ignore`.
If `Extra.ignore` is used, then `typeddict_validator` will use `Extra.ignore` (if the user didn't specify anything), which means extra fields in `TypedDict` will be ignored. This is the default behavior of `TypedDict` in Python.
But if the user specifies `Extra.forbid` in `validate_arguments(config={'extra': Extra.forbid})`, it should be respected.
And if they specify `Extra.allow`, it should be respected.
So the problem is:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
extra = Extra.forbid
```
This ALWAYS sets `extra` to `Extra.forbid`, overriding `CustomConfig`.
If we change it to:
```python
class Config(CustomConfig):
pass
```
Then:
1. If `CustomConfig` has `extra`, it is used.
2. If `CustomConfig` does NOT have `extra`, it uses `BaseModel`'s default (`Extra.ignore`).
But Pydantic's `validate_arguments` seems to want `Extra.forbid` as the default.
Wait, let me check if I'm right about that. If I don't provide `config`, does `validate_arguments` use `Extra.forbid` for its sub-models (like `TypedDict` arguments)?
Let's test.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY'
from typing_extensions import TypedDict
from pydantic import validate_arguments, Extra
class TypedTest(TypedDict):
y: str
@validate_arguments
def test(other: TypedTest):
pass
try:
test(other={'y': 'b', 'z': 'a'})
print("Success")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Failed: {e}")
PY
<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Patch, tests and logs
Final code change Included
Test output Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Test errors Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Test report (JUnit) Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Agent log Included
[ 0.0s] 📋 System Prompt: You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`.
[ 0.0s] 🎯 Task Prompt: You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository samuelcolvin/pydantic.
[ 22.6s] 💭 (733 chars) "The user is reporting a bug where `extra` config is not respected for `TypedDict` when using
the `validate_arguments` de..."
[ 22.6s] 🔧 run_command (17 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
[ 22.8s] → Failed: 1 validation error for Test
[ 30.5s] 💭 (239 chars) "The bug is reproduced. Now I need to find where `validate_arguments` is implemented and how
it handles `TypedDict`.
`va..."
[ 30.5s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn --include="*.py" "validate_arguments" pydantic/
[ 30.6s] → pydantic/fields.py:407: # check also `Required` because of `validate_arguments` that
sets `...` as de
[ 34.3s] 💭 (71 chars) "It's in `pydantic/decorator.py`. Let's examine `pydantic/decorator.py`."
[ 34.3s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/decorator.py)
[ 34.3s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/decorator.py', 'content': 'from functools import wraps\nfrom
typing import TYPE_C…
[ 38.3s] 💭 (97 chars) "I need to read the rest of `pydantic/decorator.py`, especially `create_model` and
`build_values`."
[ 38.3s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/decorator.py)
[ 38.3s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/decorator.py', 'content': 'from functools import wraps\nfrom
typing import TYPE_C…
[ 51.0s] 💭 (437 chars) "I messed up the `read_file` call. I requested `start_line":151` but I didn't use a
dictionary for `read_file` args prope..."
[ 51.0s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/decorator.py)
[ 51.0s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/decorator.py', 'content': '\n var_kwargs = {}\n
wrong_positional_ar…
[ 95.6s] 💭 (2346 chars) "Okay, I see how it works. `validate_arguments` creates a `DecoratorBaseModel` and then uses
`create_model` to create a m..."
[ 95.6s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn --include="*.py" "TypedDict" pydantic/
[ 95.6s] → pydantic/error_wrappers.py:8: from typing_extensions import TypedDict
[ 99.5s] 💭 (135 chars) "It seems `pydantic/validators.py` has `typeddict_validator` and
`create_model_from_typeddict`.
Let's examine `pydantic/..."
[ 99.5s] 🔧 run_command grep -n "create_model_from_typeddict" pydantic/validators.py
[ 99.5s] → 583: from .annotated_types import create_model_from_typeddict
[ 101.6s] 💭 (69 chars) "It's imported from `pydantic/annotated_types.py`. Let's look at that."
[ 101.6s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/annotated_types.py)
[ 101.7s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/annotated_types.py', 'content': 'from typing import
TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Dict, Fro…
[ 107.4s] 💭 (196 chars) "So `create_model_from_typeddict` just calls `create_model(typeddict_cls.__name__, **kwargs,
**field_definitions)`.
Now ..."
[ 107.4s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/validators.py)
[ 107.5s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/validators.py', 'content': "def make_typeddict_validator(\n
typeddict_cls: Typ…
[ 114.2s] 💭 (296 chars) "The `make_typeddict_validator` function takes `config` and passes it as `__config__` to
`create_model_from_typeddict`.
..."
[ 114.2s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn "make_typeddict_validator" pydantic/
[ 114.2s] → pydantic/validators.py:580:def make_typeddict_validator(
[ 118.2s] 💭 (76 chars) "It is called in `pydantic/validators.py` on line 696. Let's see the context."
[ 118.2s] 📖 read_file (pydantic/validators.py)
[ 118.2s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pydantic/validators.py', 'content': ' yield
make_literal_validator(type_)\n …
[ 201.7s] 💭 (4851 chars) "This looks like it's part of some validator generation logic.
Let's go back to `pydantic/decorator.py`.
`validate_argum..."
[ 201.7s] 🔧 run_command (13 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
[ 201.8s] → Failed: 1 validation error for Test
[ 302.8s] 💭 (4980 chars) "Wait, the error message is `unexpected keyword argument: 'y' (type=type_error)`.
This comes from the `check_kwargs` vali..."
[ 302.8s] 🔧 run_command (17 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
[ 302.8s] → Failed: 1 validation error for Test
Native result row
{
"agent_error": "Agent exceeded session timeout (7.5 min)",
"duration_seconds": 465.25,
"error": "Empty agent patch",
"grade": {
"error": "Empty agent patch",
"resolved": false,
"strict_clean_patch": false,
"test_exit_code": -1
},
"instance_id": "samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177",
"pass_idx": 0,
"patch_chars": 0,
"phase1_seconds": 465.25,
"repo": "samuelcolvin/pydantic",
"request_log_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/requests/samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177__p0__r3.jsonl",
"resolved": false,
"rollout_idx": 3,
"run_key": "samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177__p0__r3",
"strict_clean_patch": false,
"tool_calls": 13,
"total_llm_calls": 13,
"trace_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/traces/trace_samuelcolvin__pydantic-3177__p0__r3.json"
}