ROLLOUT 5 · pymodbus-dev/pymodbus
pymodbus-dev__pymodbus-1923
Not solved
469 stotal time
8tool calls
8model calls
6,653tokens generated
80,316prompt tokens read
Empty agent patch
Turn by turn
Token shading: p ≥ 0.9 0.5 – 0.9 0.2 – 0.5 below 0.2. Hover a token for its id and probability.
System instructions 4,822 characters
You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`. Your sole objective is to produce a minimal, root-cause source patch that passes every hidden fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass regression test on the first grading run. ## Critical Environment & Grader Rules 1. **Air-Gapped Sandbox & Available CLI Tools**: No network access. Never run `pip`, `uv`, `conda`, or `git fetch`. Note: `rg` (`ripgrep`) is NOT installed in the container — always use `grep -rn --include="*.py"` for fast exact searches so you never waste a tool call on `command not found`. 2. **Protected Grading Paths**: Before running official verification, the grading harness **strips and reverts all changes** to `tests/`, `test/`, `testing/`, `test_*.py`, `*_test.py`, `conftest.py`, `pyproject.toml`, `setup.cfg`, `pytest.ini`, and `tox.ini`. Every part of your fix MUST reside in non-test production source files. 3. **Untracked File Trap (`git add -N .`)**: `submit_patch` stages ALL untracked files inside `/workspace`! Never leave reproduction or scratch files inside `/workspace` — run reproductions inline via `python3 - <<'PY'` or inside `/tmp/repro.py` in a single `run_command`. 4. **Stdout Truncation Rule**: `run_command` truncates stdout after the first 5,000 characters from the TOP. Always run pytest quietly with short tracebacks: `pytest path/to/test_file.py -k pattern -q --tb=short --no-header` If a test file is large, redirect output to `/tmp/pytest.log` and inspect `tail -n 80 /tmp/pytest.log` so failure tracebacks at the bottom are never cut off. 5. **Strict Pacing Discipline**: `get_status` and `submit_patch` are free and do NOT count toward `max_tool_calls`. Target **16-22 counted tool calls total**, and **begin your first `edit_file` change no later than tool call 15**. Reserve at least 4 calls for verification, `git status --short && git diff`, and submission. ## Execution Protocol ### Phase 1 — Pinpoint Code & Tests Immediately (1-2 tool calls) - The user message already contains `Workspace Layout` — do NOT waste a turn running `ls` on top-level directories. - Run a single compound `run_command` with `grep -rn --include="*.py"` to locate: (a) the exact symbols, error strings, or functions from the problem description, (b) **all parallel or sibling implementations** (for example sync + async variants, `Client` + `AsyncClient`, serializer + deserializer, multiple backends/dialects, base + subclass methods, `__init__.py` / `__all__` exports), and (c) the closest existing unit test files under `tests/`. ### Phase 2 — Deep Read & Spec Anchor (2-5 tool calls) - Use `read_file` with generous `start_line` and `end_line` windows (180-300 lines per call so you read whole modules in fewer calls) on the target function/class, callers, type annotations, and neighboring tests. - Before editing, verify every explicit and implicit requirement from the issue: exact parameter names, defaults, boundary/domain edge cases, exception types/messages, `None` vs empty collection vs falsy (`0`, `False`, `""`) semantics, mutability/copying, and return types. ### Phase 3 — Reproduce Bug in One Call (1 tool call) - Run ONE concise command (`python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` or targeted `pytest ... -q --tb=short --no-header`) via `run_command` to observe the exact pre-fix failure. Do NOT spend multiple tool calls writing separate reproduction scripts. ### Phase 4 — Surgical Implementation Across All Parallel Paths (1-4 tool calls) - Begin editing by tool call 15! Use `edit_file` with 4-6 lines of exact surrounding context copied from `read_file`. - Update ALL parallel codepaths (sync/async, multiple classes/dialects, type hints) consistently so partial fixes do not fail sibling tests. - **2-Strike Edit Rule**: If `edit_file` fails twice on the same block due to whitespace or escaping, do not retry `edit_file` a third time — apply an atomic Python transformation via `run_command` and immediately verify `python3 -m py_compile path/to/file.py`. ### Phase 5 — Edge-Case Verification, Diff Hygiene & Clean Exit (2-4 tool calls) - Run a single compound `run_command` testing both your reproduction + boundary edge cases (`None`, empty input, leading/trailing delimiters, subdomain/prefix boundaries, subclass/async parity) AND the relevant existing `pytest` module(s) with `-q --tb=short --no-header`. - Run `git status --short && git diff` via `run_command`. Confirm: - ZERO untracked (`??`) files in `/workspace` (`rm -f` any untracked workspace files immediately), - ZERO modifications to `tests/` or protected config files (`git checkout -- tests/` if touched), - Minimal, clean diff with valid imports and indentation. - Call `submit_patch` once verification passes, then respond with a brief 2-sentence plain-text summary and make NO further tool calls.
Task prompt 11,117 characters
You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository pymodbus-dev/pymodbus.
Problem Statement:
Pymodbus doesn't correctly handle Reassembled TCP segments
### Versions
- Python: Python: 3.11.4
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04
- Pymodbus: pymodbus-3.7.0.dev0 (git commit 81df5b1cde349dddd32ac3c1fd97ec4b475c2512) as well as 3.5.4
- Modbus Hardware (if used): SMA STP 6000TL-20 (version 02.51.02.R)
### Pymodbus Specific
- Client: tcp - async
### Description
When trying to read registers from the SMA STP 6000TL Inverter, the Modbus Response is split over 2 frames where the second frame only contains the last required byte. pymodbus doesn't seem to reassemble the modbus frames and instead tries parsing the first frame as a modbus response which it discards because it doesn't pass the Frame check. It then tries reading the second frame (consisting of only one byte) as a response and throws an exception because it can't decode it.
pymodbus should probably check the length of the tcp packet and only run the frame check once the complete packet has arrived. I've attached the client code, pymodbus logs and a wireshark capture of the modbus traffic.
### Code and Logs
[20240104_tcp_reassembly.pcapng.gz](https://github.com/pymodbus-dev/pymodbus/files/13828939/20240104_tcp_reassembly.pcapng.gz)
```python
import asyncio
import pymodbus
from pymodbus.client import AsyncModbusTcpClient
from pymodbus.constants import Endian
from pymodbus.exceptions import ModbusException
from pymodbus.payload import BinaryPayloadDecoder
from pymodbus.pdu import ExceptionResponse
pymodbus.pymodbus_apply_logging_config("DEBUG")
async def main():
async with AsyncModbusTcpClient(
host="127.0.0.1", port=5502, reconnect_delay=0
) as mbus:
response = await mbus.read_holding_registers(42109, 4, slave=1)
decoder = BinaryPayloadDecoder.fromRegisters(
response.registers, byteorder=Endian.BIG, wordorder=Endian.BIG
)
_serial = decoder.decode_32bit_uint()
_susy_id = decoder.decode_16bit_uint()
unit_id = decoder.decode_16bit_uint()
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
```
Logs:
```
2024-01-04 11:16:16,385 DEBUG logging:103 Connecting to 127.0.0.1:5502.
2024-01-04 11:16:16,385 DEBUG logging:103 Connecting comm
2024-01-04 11:16:16,385 DEBUG logging:103 Connected to comm
2024-01-04 11:16:16,385 DEBUG logging:103 callback_connected called
2024-01-04 11:16:16,385 DEBUG logging:103 send: 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x6 0x1 0x3 0xa4 0x7d 0x0 0x4
2024-01-04 11:16:16,385 DEBUG logging:103 Adding transaction 1
2024-01-04 11:16:16,635 DEBUG logging:103 recv: 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0 old_data: addr=None
2024-01-04 11:16:16,635 DEBUG logging:103 Processing: 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0
2024-01-04 11:16:16,635 DEBUG logging:103 Frame check failed, ignoring!!
2024-01-04 11:16:16,635 DEBUG logging:103 Resetting frame - Current Frame in buffer - 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0
2024-01-04 11:16:16,719 DEBUG logging:103 recv: 0x3 old_data: addr=None
2024-01-04 11:16:16,719 DEBUG logging:103 Processing: 0x3
2024-01-04 11:16:16,719 DEBUG logging:103 Factory Response[ReadHoldingRegistersResponse': 3]
2024-01-04 11:16:16,719 ERROR logging:115 General exception: index out of range
2024-01-04 11:16:16,719 DEBUG logging:103 Resetting frame - Current Frame in buffer - 0x3
Fatal error: protocol.data_received() call failed.
protocol: <pymodbus.client.tcp.AsyncModbusTcpClient object at 0x7fa70e325f70>
transport: <_SelectorSocketTransport fd=6 read=polling write=<idle, bufsize=0>>
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/asyncio/selector_events.py", line 862, in _read_ready__data_received
self._protocol.data_received(data)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/transport/transport.py", line 318, in data_received
self.datagram_received(data, None)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/transport/transport.py", line 352, in datagram_received
cut = self.callback_data(self.recv_buffer, addr=addr)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/client/base.py", line 186, in callback_data
self.framer.processIncomingPacket(data, self._handle_response, slave=0)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/base.py", line 139, in processIncomingPacket
self.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single, callback, slave, **kwargs)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py", line 136, in frameProcessIncomingPacket
self._process(callback, tid, error=True)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py", line 154, in _process
raise ModbusIOException("Unable to decode request")
pymodbus.exceptions.ModbusIOException: Modbus Error: [Input/Output] Unable to decode request
2024-01-04 11:16:16,721 DEBUG logging:103 Connection lost comm due to Modbus Error: [Input/Output] Unable to decode request
2024-01-04 11:16:16,721 DEBUG logging:103 Getting transaction 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bug_reproducer.py", line 27, in <module>
asyncio.run(main())
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/asyncio/runners.py", line 44, in run
return loop.run_until_complete(main)
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/asyncio/base_events.py", line 616, in run_until_complete
return future.result()
File "bug_reproducer.py", line 17, in main
response = await mbus.read_holding_registers(42109, 4, slave=1)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/client/base.py", line 167, in async_execute
resp = await asyncio.wait_for(
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/asyncio/tasks.py", line 494, in wait_for
return fut.result()
pymodbus.exceptions.ConnectionException: Modbus Error: [Connection] Connection lost during request
```
## Task Budget (Session terminates when any budget is exhausted)
- Time allowance: 7.5 minutes
- Tool calls allowance: 30 calls
- Max loop iterations: 40 turns
## Execution Environment Rules
- Single command timeout: 90 seconds (commands exceeding this fail without ending the session)
- Command output limit: 5000 characters
- File view limit: 150 lines per read_file call
- File character limit: 10000 characters per read_file call
- Environment is offline (no network/PyPI access). All repository and test dependencies are ALREADY pre-installed. Do NOT attempt to run pip install or download packages.
## Instructions:
0. All source code is under `/workspace`. Do NOT search outside `/workspace` (e.g. `/usr/`, `/wheels/`, system site-packages). If imports fail, the issue is in the source code under `/workspace`, not in missing system packages.
1. Analyze the problem statement and any provided hints carefully to identify all requested script paths, CLI subcommands, or Python modules.
2. Inspect existing codebase conventions and test files before making edits.
3. Verify your implementation using targeted tests or inline assertions before submitting.
4. Call submit_patch only after your implementation is complete and verified.
5. As your final action, you must return a text-only response reporting your completion to terminate the session.
## Workspace Layout
The repository is located at `/workspace`. Here is the directory tree (up to 3 levels):
```
./API_changes.rst
./AUTHORS.rst
./CHANGELOG.rst
./CONTRIBUTING.rst
./LICENSE
./MAKE_RELEASE.rst
./MANIFEST.in
./README.rst
./check_ci.sh
./doc
./doc/Makefile
./doc/build_html
./doc/conf.py
./doc/index.rst
./doc/source
./doc/source/REPL.rst
./doc/source/_static
./doc/source/api_changes.rst
./doc/source/authors.rst
./doc/source/changelog.rst
./doc/source/client.rst
./doc/source/examples.rst
./doc/source/internals.rst
./doc/source/library
./doc/source/readme.rst
./doc/source/server.rst
./doc/source/simulator.rst
./examples
./githooks
./githooks/pre-commit
./pymodbus
./pymodbus/__init__.py
./pymodbus/bit_read_message.py
./pymodbus/bit_write_message.py
./pymodbus/client
./pymodbus/client/__init__.py
./pymodbus/client/base.py
./pymodbus/client/mixin.py
./pymodbus/client/serial.py
./pymodbus/client/tcp.py
./pymodbus/client/tls.py
./pymodbus/client/udp.py
./pymodbus/constants.py
./pymodbus/datastore
./pymodbus/datastore/__init__.py
./pymodbus/datastore/context.py
./pymodbus/datastore/remote.py
./pymodbus/datastore/simulator.py
./pymodbus/datastore/store.py
./pymodbus/device.py
./pymodbus/diag_message.py
./pymodbus/events.py
./pymodbus/exceptions.py
./pymodbus/factory.py
./pymodbus/file_message.py
./pymodbus/framer
./pymodbus/framer/__init__.py
./pymodbus/framer/ascii_framer.py
./pymodbus/framer/base.py
./pymodbus/framer/binary_framer.py
./pymodbus/framer/rtu_framer.py
./pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py
./pymodbus/framer/tls_framer.py
./pymodbus/logging.py
./pymodbus/mei_message.py
./pymodbus/other_message.py
./pymodbus/payload.py
./pymodbus/pdu.py
./pymodbus/py.typed
./pymodbus/register_read_message.py
./pymodbus/register_write_message.py
./pymodbus/repl
./pymodbus/repl/README.rst
./pymodbus/repl/__init__.py
./pymodbus/repl/client
./pymodbus/repl/server
./pymodbus/server
./pymodbus/server/__init__.py
./pymodbus/server/async_io.py
./pymodbus/server/reactive
./pymodbus/server/simulator
./pymodbus/transaction.py
./pymodbus/transport
./pymodbus/transport/__init__.py
./pymodbus/transport/transport.py
./pymodbus/transport/transport_serial.py
./pymodbus/utilities.py
./pyproject.toml
./test
./test/__init__.py
./test/conftest.py
./test/sub_client
./test/sub_client/test_client.py
./test/sub_client/test_client_faulty_response.py
./test/sub_client/test_client_sync.py
./test/sub_client/test_repl_client.py
./test/sub_examples
./test/sub_examples/__init__.py
./test/sub_examples/conftest.py
./test/sub_examples/test_client_server_async.py
./test/sub_examples/test_client_server_sync.py
./test/sub_examples/test_examples.py
./test/sub_examples/test_helper.py
./test/sub_messages
./test/sub_messages/test_all_messages.py
./test/sub_messages/test_bit_read_messages.py
./test/sub_messages/test_bit_write_messages.py
./test/sub_messages/test_diag_messages.py
./test/sub_messages/test_mei_messages.py
./test/sub_messages/test_other_messages.py
./test/sub_messages/test_register_read_messages.py
./test/sub_messages/test_register_write_messages.py
./test/sub_server
./test/sub_server/test_server_asyncio.py
./test/sub_server/test_server_context.py
./test/sub_server/test_server_multidrop.py
./test/sub_server/test_simulator.py
./test/sub_transport
./test/sub_transport/__init__.py
./test/sub_transport/conftest.py
./test/sub_transport/test_basic.py
./test/sub_transport/test_comm.py
./test/sub_transport/test_nullmodem.py
./test/sub_transport/test_protocol.py
./test/sub_transport/test_reconnect.py
./test/test_device.py
./test/test_events.py
./test/test_exceptions.py
./test/test_factory.py
./test/test_file_message.py
./test/test_framers.py
./test/test_logging.py
./test/test_payload.py
./test/test_pdu.py
./test/test_remote_datastore.py
./test/test_sparse_datastore.py
./test/test_transaction.py
./test/test_utilities.py
```
Turn 1at 108 s1,406 tokens out6,231 prompt tokens
The user is reporting an issue where `pymodbus` (specifically `AsyncModbusTcpClient`) fails to handle TCP segments that are split.
The log provided shows:
1. `recv: 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0 old_data: addr=None`
2. `Processing: 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
3. `Frame check failed, ignoring!!`
4. `Resetting frame - Current Frame in buffer - 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
5. `recv: 0x3 old_data: addr=None`
6. `Processing: 0x3`
7. `Factory Response[ReadHoldingRegistersResponse': 3]`
8. `ERROR logging:115 General exception: index out of range`
The key is that the first segment was received, but it failed the frame check. Then a second segment arrived, and it was processed as a complete frame (which it wasn't).
In Modbus TCP, the MBAP header is 7 bytes long. The 5th through 7th bytes of the header (bytes 4, 5, 6 if 0-indexed) indicate the length of the remaining PDU.
The log shows:
`0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
MBAP Header:
- Transaction ID: `0x0 0x1` (2 bytes)
- Protocol ID: `0x0 0x0` (2 bytes)
- Length: `0x0 0xb` (2 bytes) -> 11 bytes
- Unit ID: `0x1` (1 byte)
Total MBAP header = 7 bytes.
The Length field says 11 bytes follow the length field.
The bytes following the length field are: `0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
Let's count them:
1. `0x1` (Unit ID)
2. `0x3` (Function Code 3 - Read Holding Registers)
3. `0x8` (Byte Count - 8 bytes of data)
4. `0x0` (Data 1)
5. `0xb5` (Data 2)
6. `0x12` (Data 3)
7. `0x2f` (Data 4)
8. `0x37` (Data 5)
9. `0x21` (Data 6)
10. `0x0` (Data 7)
There are only 10 bytes following the length field. But the length field `0x0 0xb` indicates 11 bytes.
So one byte is missing.
The second `recv` is `0x3`.
If we append `0x3` to the previous buffer, we have 11 bytes.
The issue is that the framer is attempting to process the packet as soon as some data arrives, rather than waiting until the amount of data specified in the MBAP header is received.
Relevant files:
- `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`
- `pymodbus/framer/base.py`
- `pymodbus/client/base.py`
- `pymodbus/transport/transport.py`
Let's start by locating the `processIncomingPacket` and `frameProcessIncomingPacket` (or similar) methods in the framers.
The traceback provided:
```
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/transport/transport.py", line 352, in datagram_received
cut = self.callback_data(self.recv_buffer, addr=addr)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/client/base.py", line 186, in callback_data
self.framer.processIncomingPacket(data, self._handle_response, slave=0)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/base.py", line 139, in processIncomingPacket
self.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single, callback, slave, **kwargs)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py", line 136, in frameProcessIncomingPacket
self._process(callback, tid, error=True)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py", line 154, in _process
raise ModbusIOException("Unable to decode request")
```
Wait, the traceback says `socket_framer.py` line 136 calls `_process`, which at line 154 raises `ModbusIOException`.
Let's examine `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py` and `pymodbus/framer/base.py`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn --include=\"*.py\" \"processIncomingPacket\" pymodbus/framer/"
}Result of run_command 159 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "pymodbus/framer/base.py:115: def processIncomingPacket(self, data, callback, slave, **kwargs):\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 1,406 tokens · stopped: STOP
<|channel>thought
The user is reporting an issue where `pymodbus` (specifically `AsyncModbusTcpClient`) fails to handle TCP segments that are split.
The log provided shows:
1. `recv: 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0 old_data: addr=None`
2. `Processing: 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
3. `Frame check failed, ignoring!!`
4. `Resetting frame - Current Frame in buffer - 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
5. `recv: 0x3 old_data: addr=None`
6. `Processing: 0x3`
7. `Factory Response[ReadHoldingRegistersResponse': 3]`
8. `ERROR logging:115 General exception: index out of range`
The key is that the first segment was received, but it failed the frame check. Then a second segment arrived, and it was processed as a complete frame (which it wasn't).
In Modbus TCP, the MBAP header is 7 bytes long. The 5th through 7th bytes of the header (bytes 4, 5, 6 if 0-indexed) indicate the length of the remaining PDU.
The log shows:
`0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
MBAP Header:
- Transaction ID: `0x0 0x1` (2 bytes)
- Protocol ID: `0x0 0x0` (2 bytes)
- Length: `0x0 0xb` (2 bytes) -> 11 bytes
- Unit ID: `0x1` (1 byte)
Total MBAP header = 7 bytes.
The Length field says 11 bytes follow the length field.
The bytes following the length field are: `0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0`
Let's count them:
1. `0x1` (Unit ID)
2. `0x3` (Function Code 3 - Read Holding Registers)
3. `0x8` (Byte Count - 8 bytes of data)
4. `0x0` (Data 1)
5. `0xb5` (Data 2)
6. `0x12` (Data 3)
7. `0x2f` (Data 4)
8. `0x37` (Data 5)
9. `0x21` (Data 6)
10. `0x0` (Data 7)
There are only 10 bytes following the length field. But the length field `0x0 0xb` indicates 11 bytes.
So one byte is missing.
The second `recv` is `0x3`.
If we append `0x3` to the previous buffer, we have 11 bytes.
The issue is that the framer is attempting to process the packet as soon as some data arrives, rather than waiting until the amount of data specified in the MBAP header is received.
Relevant files:
- `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`
- `pymodbus/framer/base.py`
- `pymodbus/client/base.py`
- `pymodbus/transport/transport.py`
Let's start by locating the `processIncomingPacket` and `frameProcessIncomingPacket` (or similar) methods in the framers.
The traceback provided:
```
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/transport/transport.py", line 352, in datagram_received
cut = self.callback_data(self.recv_buffer, addr=addr)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/client/base.py", line 186, in callback_data
self.framer.processIncomingPacket(data, self._handle_response, slave=0)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/base.py", line 139, in processIncomingPacket
self.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single, callback, slave, **kwargs)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py", line 136, in frameProcessIncomingPacket
self._process(callback, tid, error=True)
File "/home/simon/tools/pymodbus/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py", line 154, in _process
raise ModbusIOException("Unable to decode request")
```
Wait, the traceback says `socket_framer.py` line 136 calls `_process`, which at line 154 raises `ModbusIOException`.
Let's examine `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py` and `pymodbus/framer/base.py`.<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn --include="*.py" "processIncomingPacket" pymodbus/framer/<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 2at 114 s85 tokens out7,709 prompt tokens
Wait, only `base.py` has `processIncomingPacket`? No, the traceback mentioned `socket_framer.py` had `frameProcessIncomingPacket`. Let's grep for `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn --include=\"*.py\" \"frameProcessIncomingPacket\" pymodbus/framer/"
}Result of run_command 850 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "pymodbus/framer/binary_framer.py:121: def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, _tid=None, **kwargs):\npymodbus/framer/base.py:139: self.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single, callback, slave, **kwargs)\npymodbus/framer/base.py:141: def frameProcessIncomingPacket(\npymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py:119: def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):\npymodbus/framer/tls_framer.py:91: def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, _tid=None, **kwargs):\npymodbus/framer/ascii_framer.py:111: def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, _tid=None, **kwargs):\npymodbus/framer/rtu_framer.py:208: def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, _tid=None, **kwargs):\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 85 tokens · stopped: STOP
Wait, only `base.py` has `processIncomingPacket`? No, the traceback mentioned `socket_framer.py` had `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
Let's grep for `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn --include="*.py" "frameProcessIncomingPacket" pymodbus/framer/<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 3at 118 s67 tokens out8,097 prompt tokens
Okay, so `socket_framer.py` implements `frameProcessIncomingPacket`. Let's read `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"filepath": "pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py"
}Result of read_file 5,838 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py",
"content": "\"\"\"Socket framer.\"\"\"\n# pylint: disable=missing-type-doc\nimport struct\n\nfrom pymodbus.exceptions import (\n InvalidMessageReceivedException,\n ModbusIOException,\n)\nfrom pymodbus.framer.base import SOCKET_FRAME_HEADER, ModbusFramer\nfrom pymodbus.logging import Log\n\n\n# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #\n# Modbus TCP Message\n# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #\n\n\nclass ModbusSocketFramer(ModbusFramer):\n \"\"\"Modbus Socket Frame controller.\n\n Before each modbus TCP message is an MBAP header which is used as a\n message frame. It allows us to easily separate messages as follows::\n\n [ MBAP Header ] [ Function Code] [ Data ] \\\n [ tid ][ pid ][ length ][ uid ]\n 2b 2b 2b 1b 1b Nb\n\n while len(message) > 0:\n tid, pid, length`, uid = struct.unpack(\">HHHB\", message)\n request = message[0:7 + length - 1`]\n message = [7 + length - 1:]\n\n * length = uid + function code + data\n * The -1 is to account for the uid byte\n \"\"\"\n\n method = \"socket\"\n\n def __init__(self, decoder, client=None):\n \"\"\"Initialize a new instance of the framer.\n\n :param decoder: The decoder factory implementation to use\n \"\"\"\n super().__init__(decoder, client)\n self._hsize = 0x07\n\n # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #\n # Private Helper Functions\n # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #\n def checkFrame(self):\n \"\"\"Check and decode the next frame.\n\n Return true if we were successful.\n \"\"\"\n if self.isFrameReady():\n (\n self._header[\"tid\"],\n self._header[\"pid\"],\n self._header[\"len\"],\n self._header[\"uid\"],\n ) = struct.unpack(\">HHHB\", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])\n\n # someone sent us an error? ignore it\n if self._header[\"len\"] < 2:\n self.advanceFrame()\n # we have at least a complete message, continue\n elif len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header[\"len\"]:\n return True\n # we don't have enough of a message yet, wait\n return False\n\n def advanceFrame(self):\n \"\"\"Skip over the current framed message.\n\n This allows us to skip over the current message after we have processed\n it or determined that it contains an error. It also has to reset the\n current frame header handle\n \"\"\"\n length = self._hsize + self._header[\"len\"] - 1\n self._buffer = self._buffer[length:]\n self._header = {\"tid\": 0, \"pid\": 0, \"len\": 0, \"uid\": 0}\n\n def isFrameReady(self):\n \"\"\"Check if we should continue decode logic.\n\n This is meant to be used in a while loop in the decoding phase to let\n the decoder factory know that there is still data in the buffer.\n\n :returns: True if ready, False otherwise\n \"\"\"\n return len(self._buffer) > self._hsize\n\n def getFrame(self):\n \"\"\"Return the next frame from the buffered data.\n\n :returns: The next full frame buffer\n \"\"\"\n length = self._hsize + self._header[\"len\"] - 1\n return self._buffer[self._hsize : length]\n\n # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #\n # Public Member Functions\n # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #\n def decode_data(self, data):\n \"\"\"Decode data.\"\"\"\n if len(data) > self._hsize:\n tid, pid, length, uid, fcode = struct.unpack(\n SOCKET_FRAME_HEADER, data[0 : self._hsize + 1]\n )\n return {\n \"tid\": tid,\n \"pid\": pid,\n \"length\": length,\n \"slave\": uid,\n \"fcode\": fcode,\n }\n return {}\n\n def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):\n \"\"\"Process new packet pattern.\n\n This takes in a new request packet, adds it to the current\n packet stream, and performs framing on it. That is, checks\n for complete messages, and once found, will process all that\n exist. This handles the case when we read N + 1 or 1 // N\n messages at a time instead of 1.\n\n The processed and decoded messages are pushed to the callback\n function to process and send.\n \"\"\"\n while True:\n if not self.isFrameReady():\n if len(self._buffer):\n # Possible error ???\n if self._header[\"len\"] < 2:\n self._process(callback, tid, error=True)\n break\n if not self.checkFrame():\n Log.debug(\"Frame check failed, ignoring!!\")\n self.resetFrame()\n continue\n if not self._validate_slave_id(slave, single):\n header_txt = self._header[\"uid\"]\n Log.debug(\"Not a valid slave id - {}, ignoring!!\", header_txt)\n self.resetFrame()\n continue\n self._process(callback, tid)\n\n def _process(self, callback, tid, error=False):\n \"\"\"Process incoming packets irrespective error condition.\"\"\"",
"start_line": 1,
"end_line": 150,
"total_lines": 182,
"is_truncated": true
}Generated tokens 67 tokens · stopped: STOP
Okay, so `socket_framer.py` implements `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
Let's read `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 4at 183 s1,085 tokens out9,698 prompt tokens
Let's look at `frameProcessIncomingPacket` and `checkFrame`.
```python
def checkFrame(self):
"""Check and decode the next frame.
Return true if we were successful.
"""
if self.isFrameReady():
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
# someone sent us an error? ignore it
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
# we have at least a complete message, continue
elif len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True
# we don't have enough of a message yet, wait
return False
def isFrameReady(self):
"""Check if we should continue decode logic.
This is meant to be used in a while loop in the decoding phase to let
the decoder factory know that there is still data in the buffer.
:returns: True if ready, False otherwise
"""
return len(self._buffer) > self._hsize
```
The logic in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
```python
def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):
# ...
while True:
if not self.isFrameReady():
if len(self._buffer):
# Possible error ???
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self._process(callback, tid, error=True)
break
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
# ...
self._process(callback, tid)
```
Wait! If `checkFrame()` returns `False`, it means the frame is not yet complete. But `frameProcessIncomingPacket` treats `checkFrame() == False` as a "Frame check failed" and calls `resetFrame()`.
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
```
If `checkFrame()` returns `False`, it just means we are waiting for more data. We should `break` the loop and wait for more data to arrive in `_buffer`, NOT `resetFrame()` and continue (which will likely lead to an infinite loop or discarding data).
Let's trace what happens with the provided logs:
1. First packet arrives. `self._buffer` has 16 bytes. `self._hsize` is 7.
2. `isFrameReady()` returns `True`.
3. `checkFrame()`:
- `isFrameReady()` is True.
- `struct.unpack` reads header. `len` = 11.
- `len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1` = `16 - 7 + 1` = 10.
- `10 >= 11` is `False`.
- `checkFrame()` returns `False`.
4. Back in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
- `if not self.checkFrame():` is `True`.
- `Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")` is logged.
- `self.resetFrame()` is called.
- `continue` to next iteration of `while True`.
This is exactly what happened in the logs!
The fix should be to `break` when `checkFrame()` is `False`, instead of calling `resetFrame()`.
Wait, but `checkFrame` also does:
```python
# someone sent us an error? ignore it
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
```
And `advanceFrame` does:
```python
def advanceFrame(self):
# ...
length = self._hsize + self._header["len"] - 1
self._buffer = self._buffer[length:]
self._header = {"tid": 0, "pid": 0, "len": 0, "uid": 0}
```
But `checkFrame` returns `None` (which is falsy) if it calls `advanceFrame()`.
Actually, if `checkFrame` didn't find a full frame, it should just return `False`. But `frameProcessIncomingPacket` should stop processing and wait for more data.
Let's confirm where `resetFrame` is.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn \"def resetFrame\" pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py"
}Result of run_command 127 characters
{
"status": "error",
"error_type": "CommandError",
"error_message": "",
"details": {
"stdout": "",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 1
}
}Generated tokens 1,085 tokens · stopped: STOP
Let's look at `frameProcessIncomingPacket` and `checkFrame`.
```python
def checkFrame(self):
"""Check and decode the next frame.
Return true if we were successful.
"""
if self.isFrameReady():
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
# someone sent us an error? ignore it
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
# we have at least a complete message, continue
elif len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True
# we don't have enough of a message yet, wait
return False
def isFrameReady(self):
"""Check if we should continue decode logic.
This is meant to be used in a while loop in the decoding phase to let
the decoder factory know that there is still data in the buffer.
:returns: True if ready, False otherwise
"""
return len(self._buffer) > self._hsize
```
The logic in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
```python
def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):
# ...
while True:
if not self.isFrameReady():
if len(self._buffer):
# Possible error ???
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self._process(callback, tid, error=True)
break
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
# ...
self._process(callback, tid)
```
Wait! If `checkFrame()` returns `False`, it means the frame is not yet complete. But `frameProcessIncomingPacket` treats `checkFrame() == False` as a "Frame check failed" and calls `resetFrame()`.
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
```
If `checkFrame()` returns `False`, it just means we are waiting for more data. We should `break` the loop and wait for more data to arrive in `_buffer`, NOT `resetFrame()` and continue (which will likely lead to an infinite loop or discarding data).
Let's trace what happens with the provided logs:
1. First packet arrives. `self._buffer` has 16 bytes. `self._hsize` is 7.
2. `isFrameReady()` returns `True`.
3. `checkFrame()`:
- `isFrameReady()` is True.
- `struct.unpack` reads header. `len` = 11.
- `len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1` = `16 - 7 + 1` = 10.
- `10 >= 11` is `False`.
- `checkFrame()` returns `False`.
4. Back in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
- `if not self.checkFrame():` is `True`.
- `Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")` is logged.
- `self.resetFrame()` is called.
- `continue` to next iteration of `while True`.
This is exactly what happened in the logs!
The fix should be to `break` when `checkFrame()` is `False`, instead of calling `resetFrame()`.
Wait, but `checkFrame` also does:
```python
# someone sent us an error? ignore it
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
```
And `advanceFrame` does:
```python
def advanceFrame(self):
# ...
length = self._hsize + self._header["len"] - 1
self._buffer = self._buffer[length:]
self._header = {"tid": 0, "pid": 0, "len": 0, "uid": 0}
```
But `checkFrame` returns `None` (which is falsy) if it calls `advanceFrame()`.
Actually, if `checkFrame` didn't find a full frame, it should just return `False`. But `frameProcessIncomingPacket` should stop processing and wait for more data.
Let's confirm where `resetFrame` is.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn "def resetFrame" pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 5at 186 s48 tokens out10,838 prompt tokens
Ah, `resetFrame` might be in `base.py`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn \"def resetFrame\" pymodbus/framer/base.py"
}Result of run_command 90 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "81: def resetFrame(self):\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 48 tokens · stopped: STOP
Ah, `resetFrame` might be in `base.py`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn "def resetFrame" pymodbus/framer/base.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 6at 190 s66 tokens out10,935 prompt tokens
Let's read `pymodbus/framer/base.py` to see what `resetFrame` does.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"end_line": 150,
"filepath": "pymodbus/framer/base.py",
"start_line": 70
}Result of read_file 2,948 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "pymodbus/framer/base.py",
"content": " return self.client.send(message)\n\n def recvPacket(self, size):\n \"\"\"Receive packet from the bus.\n\n With specified len\n :param size: Number of bytes to read\n :return:\n \"\"\"\n return self.client.recv(size)\n\n def resetFrame(self):\n \"\"\"Reset the entire message frame.\n\n This allows us to skip ovver errors that may be in the stream.\n It is hard to know if we are simply out of sync or if there is\n an error in the stream as we have no way to check the start or\n end of the message (python just doesn't have the resolution to\n check for millisecond delays).\n \"\"\"\n Log.debug(\n \"Resetting frame - Current Frame in buffer - {}\", self._buffer, \":hex\"\n )\n self._buffer = b\"\"\n self._header = {\n \"lrc\": \"0000\",\n \"crc\": b\"\\x00\\x00\",\n \"len\": 0,\n \"uid\": 0x00,\n \"pid\": 0,\n \"tid\": 0,\n }\n\n def populateResult(self, result):\n \"\"\"Populate the modbus result header.\n\n The serial packets do not have any header information\n that is copied.\n\n :param result: The response packet\n \"\"\"\n result.slave_id = self._header.get(\"uid\", 0)\n result.transaction_id = self._header.get(\"tid\", 0)\n result.protocol_id = self._header.get(\"pid\", 0)\n\n def processIncomingPacket(self, data, callback, slave, **kwargs):\n \"\"\"Process new packet pattern.\n\n This takes in a new request packet, adds it to the current\n packet stream, and performs framing on it. That is, checks\n for complete messages, and once found, will process all that\n exist. This handles the case when we read N + 1 or 1 // N\n messages at a time instead of 1.\n\n The processed and decoded messages are pushed to the callback\n function to process and send.\n\n :param data: The new packet data\n :param callback: The function to send results to\n :param slave: Process if slave id matches, ignore otherwise (could be a\n list of slave ids (server) or single slave id(client/server))\n :param kwargs:\n :raises ModbusIOException:\n \"\"\"\n Log.debug(\"Processing: {}\", data, \":hex\")\n self._buffer += data\n if not isinstance(slave, (list, tuple)):\n slave = [slave]\n single = kwargs.pop(\"single\", False)\n self.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single, callback, slave, **kwargs)\n\n def frameProcessIncomingPacket(\n self, _single, _callback, _slave, _tid=None, **kwargs\n ):\n \"\"\"Process new packet pattern.\"\"\"",
"start_line": 70,
"end_line": 144,
"total_lines": 144,
"is_truncated": false
}Generated tokens 66 tokens · stopped: STOP
Let's read `pymodbus/framer/base.py` to see what `resetFrame` does.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>pymodbus/framer/base.py<|"|>,start_line:70,end_line:150}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 7at 387 s3,073 tokens out11,836 prompt tokens
So `resetFrame` just clears the buffer.
Back to `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`:
```python
def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):
# ...
while True:
if not self.isFrameReady():
if len(self._buffer):
# Possible error ???
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self._process(callback, tid, error=True)
break
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
# ...
```
The `if not self.checkFrame():` block is definitely the problem. If `checkFrame()` returns `False`, it means the frame is incomplete. We should stop and wait for more data.
Wait, let's check `checkFrame()` again.
```python
def checkFrame(self):
"""Check and decode the next frame.
Return true if we were successful.
"""
if self.isFrameReady():
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
# someone sent us an error? ignore it
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
# we have at least a complete message, continue
elif len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True
# we don't have enough of a message yet, wait
return False
```
If `self._header["len"] < 2`, it calls `self.advanceFrame()` and then returns `None` (which is falsy). This will lead to `resetFrame()` and `continue` in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
And if the frame is incomplete, it returns `False`. This also leads to `resetFrame()` and `continue` in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
The fix is to change:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
```
to
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
break
```
Wait, if it was an "error" (len < 2), `checkFrame` would have already called `advanceFrame()`. If we just `break`, we stop processing and wait for more data. But if it was an error and we already `advanceFrame()`, we might want to try to process the next frame in the buffer immediately without waiting for new data.
Wait, `advanceFrame()` modifies `self._buffer`.
```python
def advanceFrame(self):
"""Skip over the current framed message.
...
"""
length = self._hsize + self._header["len"] - 1
self._buffer = self._buffer[length:]
self._header = {"tid": 0, "pid": 0, "len": 0, "uid": 0}
```
If `checkFrame()` returns `False` because `isFrameReady()` was `True` but the frame was incomplete, we MUST `break`.
If `checkFrame()` returns `False` because `self._header["len"] < 2`, then `advanceFrame()` was called, so `self._buffer` has been advanced. In this case, we should `continue` (or just let the loop run) to see if there is another frame.
So `checkFrame()` probably should distinguish between "incomplete frame" and "invalid frame".
Alternatively, `frameProcessIncomingPacket` should only `break` if no frame was found AND no data was discarded.
Let's look at `checkFrame` again. It returns `True` if a complete frame is ready. It returns `False` (or `None`) otherwise.
If I change the logic to:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
if not self.isFrameReady():
break
# If it was a real error (len < 2) advanceFrame was called,
# so we should try again if isFrameReady is still true.
# But if checkFrame’s isFrameReady was true, and it didn't return True,
# and it didn't call advanceFrame, then it just returned False (incomplete).
```
Wait, `checkFrame` return values:
1. `isFrameReady()` is `False` -> returns `False`.
2. `isFrameReady()` is `True`, `self._header["len"] < 2` -> calls `advanceFrame()`, returns `None` (falsy).
3. `isFrameReady()` is `True`, `self._header["len"] >= 2`, `len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 < self._header["len"]` -> returns `False`.
4. `isFrameReady()` is `True`, `self._header["len"] >= 2`, `len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]` -> returns `True`.
In case 3, we should `break`.
In case 2, we should `continue`.
In case 1, we should `break`.
But `checkFrame` doesn't tell us which one happened.
If we change `checkFrame` to return something else when it's just incomplete.
Or, we can modify `checkFrame` to be:
```python
def checkFrame(self):
if not self.isFrameReady():
return False, False # (ready, complete)
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
return True, False # Still ready (maybe), but not a complete frame
if len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True, True # Ready and complete
return True, False # Ready (header received), but incomplete frame
```
This seems too complex for a small fix.
What if we just change `frameProcessIncomingPacket` to:
```python
def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):
while True:
if not self.isFrameReady():
# ... (keep this block)
break
if not self.checkFrame():
# checkFrame returned False or None.
# If it called advanceFrame, we should continue.
# If it just returned False, it means the frame is incomplete.
# How to know if advanceFrame was called?
# advanceFrame resets self._header['len'] to 0.
# But we can't easily know if it was just called.
break
# ...
```
Wait, if `checkFrame` returns `False` because the frame is incomplete, we MUST `break`. If we `continue`, we just enter the loop again, `isFrameReady()` is still `True`, `checkFrame()` is still `False`... infinite loop (if we don't `resetFrame()`).
So the only way to `continue` is if some data was removed from `self._buffer`.
If `checkFrame` returns `False`, it either means:
A) `isFrameReady()` was `False`.
B) `self._header["len"] < 2` and `advanceFrame()` was called.
C) Frame is incomplete.
In case A and C, we must `break`.
In case B, we can `continue`.
Wait, let's look at the current `frameProcessIncomingPacket` again.
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
```
The problem is `self.resetFrame()` is called every time `checkFrame()` returns `False`.
If we just remove `self.resetFrame()` and `continue`, and replace it with `break`:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
break
```
What happens in case B (`self._header["len"] < 2`)?
`advanceFrame()` is called, `self._buffer` is modified. Then we `break`.
We wait for more data to arrive. When more data arrives, `processIncomingPacket` is called again, and we start the `while True` loop again. Since `self._buffer` was already advanced, we'll start from the next potential frame.
This seems correct! We don't *need* to `continue` immediately if we just wait for the next `data_received` event.
But wait, what if the buffer already contained multiple frames, and the first one was an "error" (len < 2)? If we `break`, we don't process the remaining frames in the buffer until more data arrives. That's not ideal, but not fatal.
Actually, if `checkFrame` returns `False` and we `break`, we might miss frames that are already in the buffer.
Can we modify `checkFrame` to return `True` for "we made progress (either found a frame or skipped an invalid one)" and `False` for "we are waiting for more data"?
No, `checkFrame` currently return `True` ONLY if a complete frame is ready.
Let's redefine `checkFrame` to return:
- `True`: Complete frame ready.
- `False`: Frame incomplete, wait for more data.
- `None`: Invalid frame skipped, continue checking the buffer.
```python
def checkFrame(self):
if not self.isFrameReady():
return False
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
return None # Progress made, but no frame yet
if len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True # Frame complete
return False # Frame incomplete, wait for more data
```
And in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
```python
res = self.checkFrame()
if res is True:
if not self._validate_slave_id(slave, single):
header_txt = self._header["uid"]
Log.debug("Not a valid slave id - {}, ignoring!!", header_txt)
self.resetFrame()
continue
self._process(callback, tid)
elif res is False:
break
elif res is None:
continue
```
This looks more robust.
Wait, let's check if `_validate_slave_id` is used elsewhere.
Actually, I should check if I can just do a simpler fix.
If I change `checkFrame` to return `True` for complete frame, and `False` for anything else.
And in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
# We must determine if we should break (incomplete) or continue (invalid frame skipped)
# If isFrameReady is still True, and the buffer hasn't changed, we'd loop forever.
# But checkFrame() didn't return True.
# If we check if any bytes were removed from the buffer...
break
```
Actually, the simplest fix that addresses the reported bug is just replacing `self.resetFrame()` and `continue` with `break`.
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
break
```
Let's see if that's sufficient. The user's log shows exactly this failure:
- Packet arrives, incomplete.
- `checkFrame` returns `False`.
- `resetFrame` is called (buffer cleared!).
- `continue` (loop again).
- `isFrameReady` is now `False` (buffer was cleared).
- `break` (loop ends).
- Next packet arrives (the missing byte).
- `processIncomingPacket` is called.
- `_buffer` now only contains the missing byte `0x3`.
- `isFrameReady` is `False` (len 1 < 7).
- `if len(self._buffer):` is `True`.
- `if self._header["len"] < 2:` (self._header was reset to 0).
- `self._process(callback, tid, error=True)` is called with data `0x3`.
- `_process` tries to decode `0x3` and fails with `ModbusIOException("Unable to decode request")`.
Yes, replacing `self.resetFrame()` and `continue` with `break` will fix this. The buffer will be preserved, and when the next packet arrives, `self._buffer` will be complete, `checkFrame()` will return `True`, and it will be processed.
Let's verify if there are other places where `checkFrame` is used.
grep for `checkFrame`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn \"checkFrame\" pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py"
}Result of run_command 133 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "50: def checkFrame(self):\n138: if not self.checkFrame():\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Generated tokens 3,073 tokens · stopped: STOP
So `resetFrame` just clears the buffer.
Back to `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`:
```python
def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):
# ...
while True:
if not self.isFrameReady():
if len(self._buffer):
# Possible error ???
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self._process(callback, tid, error=True)
break
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
# ...
```
The `if not self.checkFrame():` block is definitely the problem. If `checkFrame()` returns `False`, it means the frame is incomplete. We should stop and wait for more data.
Wait, let's check `checkFrame()` again.
```python
def checkFrame(self):
"""Check and decode the next frame.
Return true if we were successful.
"""
if self.isFrameReady():
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
# someone sent us an error? ignore it
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
# we have at least a complete message, continue
elif len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True
# we don't have enough of a message yet, wait
return False
```
If `self._header["len"] < 2`, it calls `self.advanceFrame()` and then returns `None` (which is falsy). This will lead to `resetFrame()` and `continue` in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
And if the frame is incomplete, it returns `False`. This also leads to `resetFrame()` and `continue` in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
The fix is to change:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
```
to
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
break
```
Wait, if it was an "error" (len < 2), `checkFrame` would have already called `advanceFrame()`. If we just `break`, we stop processing and wait for more data. But if it was an error and we already `advanceFrame()`, we might want to try to process the next frame in the buffer immediately without waiting for new data.
Wait, `advanceFrame()` modifies `self._buffer`.
```python
def advanceFrame(self):
"""Skip over the current framed message.
...
"""
length = self._hsize + self._header["len"] - 1
self._buffer = self._buffer[length:]
self._header = {"tid": 0, "pid": 0, "len": 0, "uid": 0}
```
If `checkFrame()` returns `False` because `isFrameReady()` was `True` but the frame was incomplete, we MUST `break`.
If `checkFrame()` returns `False` because `self._header["len"] < 2`, then `advanceFrame()` was called, so `self._buffer` has been advanced. In this case, we should `continue` (or just let the loop run) to see if there is another frame.
So `checkFrame()` probably should distinguish between "incomplete frame" and "invalid frame".
Alternatively, `frameProcessIncomingPacket` should only `break` if no frame was found AND no data was discarded.
Let's look at `checkFrame` again. It returns `True` if a complete frame is ready. It returns `False` (or `None`) otherwise.
If I change the logic to:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
if not self.isFrameReady():
break
# If it was a real error (len < 2) advanceFrame was called,
# so we should try again if isFrameReady is still true.
# But if checkFrame’s isFrameReady was true, and it didn't return True,
# and it didn't call advanceFrame, then it just returned False (incomplete).
```
Wait, `checkFrame` return values:
1. `isFrameReady()` is `False` -> returns `False`.
2. `isFrameReady()` is `True`, `self._header["len"] < 2` -> calls `advanceFrame()`, returns `None` (falsy).
3. `isFrameReady()` is `True`, `self._header["len"] >= 2`, `len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 < self._header["len"]` -> returns `False`.
4. `isFrameReady()` is `True`, `self._header["len"] >= 2`, `len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]` -> returns `True`.
In case 3, we should `break`.
In case 2, we should `continue`.
In case 1, we should `break`.
But `checkFrame` doesn't tell us which one happened.
If we change `checkFrame` to return something else when it's just incomplete.
Or, we can modify `checkFrame` to be:
```python
def checkFrame(self):
if not self.isFrameReady():
return False, False # (ready, complete)
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
return True, False # Still ready (maybe), but not a complete frame
if len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True, True # Ready and complete
return True, False # Ready (header received), but incomplete frame
```
This seems too complex for a small fix.
What if we just change `frameProcessIncomingPacket` to:
```python
def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave, tid=None, **kwargs):
while True:
if not self.isFrameReady():
# ... (keep this block)
break
if not self.checkFrame():
# checkFrame returned False or None.
# If it called advanceFrame, we should continue.
# If it just returned False, it means the frame is incomplete.
# How to know if advanceFrame was called?
# advanceFrame resets self._header['len'] to 0.
# But we can't easily know if it was just called.
break
# ...
```
Wait, if `checkFrame` returns `False` because the frame is incomplete, we MUST `break`. If we `continue`, we just enter the loop again, `isFrameReady()` is still `True`, `checkFrame()` is still `False`... infinite loop (if we don't `resetFrame()`).
So the only way to `continue` is if some data was removed from `self._buffer`.
If `checkFrame` returns `False`, it either means:
A) `isFrameReady()` was `False`.
B) `self._header["len"] < 2` and `advanceFrame()` was called.
C) Frame is incomplete.
In case A and C, we must `break`.
In case B, we can `continue`.
Wait, let's look at the current `frameProcessIncomingPacket` again.
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
Log.debug("Frame check failed, ignoring!!")
self.resetFrame()
continue
```
The problem is `self.resetFrame()` is called every time `checkFrame()` returns `False`.
If we just remove `self.resetFrame()` and `continue`, and replace it with `break`:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
break
```
What happens in case B (`self._header["len"] < 2`)?
`advanceFrame()` is called, `self._buffer` is modified. Then we `break`.
We wait for more data to arrive. When more data arrives, `processIncomingPacket` is called again, and we start the `while True` loop again. Since `self._buffer` was already advanced, we'll start from the next potential frame.
This seems correct! We don't *need* to `continue` immediately if we just wait for the next `data_received` event.
But wait, what if the buffer already contained multiple frames, and the first one was an "error" (len < 2)? If we `break`, we don't process the remaining frames in the buffer until more data arrives. That's not ideal, but not fatal.
Actually, if `checkFrame` returns `False` and we `break`, we might miss frames that are already in the buffer.
Can we modify `checkFrame` to return `True` for "we made progress (either found a frame or skipped an invalid one)" and `False` for "we are waiting for more data"?
No, `checkFrame` currently return `True` ONLY if a complete frame is ready.
Let's redefine `checkFrame` to return:
- `True`: Complete frame ready.
- `False`: Frame incomplete, wait for more data.
- `None`: Invalid frame skipped, continue checking the buffer.
```python
def checkFrame(self):
if not self.isFrameReady():
return False
(
self._header["tid"],
self._header["pid"],
self._header["len"],
self._header["uid"],
) = struct.unpack(">HHHB", self._buffer[0 : self._hsize])
if self._header["len"] < 2:
self.advanceFrame()
return None # Progress made, but no frame yet
if len(self._buffer) - self._hsize + 1 >= self._header["len"]:
return True # Frame complete
return False # Frame incomplete, wait for more data
```
And in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
```python
res = self.checkFrame()
if res is True:
if not self._validate_slave_id(slave, single):
header_txt = self._header["uid"]
Log.debug("Not a valid slave id - {}, ignoring!!", header_txt)
self.resetFrame()
continue
self._process(callback, tid)
elif res is False:
break
elif res is None:
continue
```
This looks more robust.
Wait, let's check if `_validate_slave_id` is used elsewhere.
Actually, I should check if I can just do a simpler fix.
If I change `checkFrame` to return `True` for complete frame, and `False` for anything else.
And in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`:
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
# We must determine if we should break (incomplete) or continue (invalid frame skipped)
# If isFrameReady is still True, and the buffer hasn't changed, we'd loop forever.
# But checkFrame() didn't return True.
# If we check if any bytes were removed from the buffer...
break
```
Actually, the simplest fix that addresses the reported bug is just replacing `self.resetFrame()` and `continue` with `break`.
```python
if not self.checkFrame():
break
```
Let's see if that's sufficient. The user's log shows exactly this failure:
- Packet arrives, incomplete.
- `checkFrame` returns `False`.
- `resetFrame` is called (buffer cleared!).
- `continue` (loop again).
- `isFrameReady` is now `False` (buffer was cleared).
- `break` (loop ends).
- Next packet arrives (the missing byte).
- `processIncomingPacket` is called.
- `_buffer` now only contains the missing byte `0x3`.
- `isFrameReady` is `False` (len 1 < 7).
- `if len(self._buffer):` is `True`.
- `if self._header["len"] < 2:` (self._header was reset to 0).
- `self._process(callback, tid, error=True)` is called with data `0x3`.
- `_process` tries to decode `0x3` and fails with `ModbusIOException("Unable to decode request")`.
Yes, replacing `self.resetFrame()` and `continue` with `break` will fix this. The buffer will be preserved, and when the next packet arrives, `self._buffer` will be complete, `checkFrame()` will return `True`, and it will be processed.
Let's verify if there are other places where `checkFrame` is used.
grep for `checkFrame`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn "checkFrame" pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 8at 460 s823 tokens out14,972 prompt tokens
Only used in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`. Now let's create a reproduction script. The user provided a script and logs. I can simulate the split packet by creating a mock transport or just a small test case. Actually, the easiest way to reproduce this is to call `frameProcessIncomingPacket` twice with split data.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nimport struct\nfrom pymodbus.framer.socket_framer import ModbusSocketFramer\nfrom pymodbus.logging import Log\nimport logging\n\n# Setup logging to capture the \"Frame check failed\" message\nlogging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\n\nclass MockClient:\n def __init__(self):\n self.response_called = False\n def handle_response(self, response):\n self.response_called = True\n print(f\"Response received: {response}\")\n\ndecoder = None # Not used for this test\nclient = MockClient()\nframer = ModbusSocketFramer(decoder, client)\n\n# Modbus TCP Response:\n# tid=1, pid=0, len=11, uid=1, fcode=3, bcount=8, data=[0, 0xb5, 0x12, 0x2f, 0x37, 0x21, 0x0, 0x3]\n# Total bytes: 7 + 11 - 1 = 17 bytes? \n# No, length field in MBAP is UID + PDU. \n# UID (1) + FCode (1) + ByteCount (1) + Data (8) = 11 bytes.\n# Total packet: 6 (tid, pid, len) + 11 = 17 bytes.\n\npacket = struct.pack(\">HHHB B B BBBBBBBB\", 1, 0, 11, 1, 3, 8, 0, 0xb5, 0x12, 0x2f, 0x37, 0x21, 0x0, 0x3)\nprint(f\"Full packet: {packet.hex()}\")\n\n# Split packet: first 16 bytes, then the last 1 byte.\npart1 = packet[:16]\npart2 = packet[16:]\n\nprint(f\"Part 1: {part1.hex()}\")\nprint(f\"Part 2: {part2.hex()}\")\n\n# Process Part 1\nframer._buffer = b\"\"\n# In a real scenario, processIncomingPacket is called.\n# We can call the internal frameProcessIncomingPacket directly.\n# since we don't have the base.py processIncomingPacket setup fully here.\n# But wait, we can just use the real class if we instantiate it.\n# Actually, let's just manually add to buffer and call frameProcessIncomingPacket.\n\nframer._buffer = part1\nframer.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single=False, callback=client.handle_response, slave=[1])\nprint(f\"After Part 1, buffer: {framer._buffer.hex()}, response_called: {client.response_called}\")\n\n# Process Part 2\nframer._buffer += part2\nframer.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single=False, callback=client.handle_response, slave=[1])\nprint(f\"After Part 2, buffer: {framer._buffer.hex()}, response_called: {client.response_called}\")\n\nif client.response_called:\n print(\"SUCCESS: Response was processed!\")\nelse:\n print(\"FAILURE: Response was not processed!\")\nPY\n"
}Result of run_command 1,494 characters
{
"status": "error",
"error_type": "CommandError",
"error_message": "DEBUG:pymodbus.logging:Frame check failed, ignoring!!\nDEBUG:pymodbus.logging:Resetting frame - Current Frame in buffer - 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"<stdin>\", line 51, in <module>\n File \"/workspace/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py\", line 136, in frameProcessIncomingPacket\n self._process(callback, tid, error=True)\n File \"/workspace/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py\", line 152, in _process\n if (result := self.decoder.decode(data)) is None:\nAttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'decode'\n",
"details": {
"stdout": "Full packet: 00010000000b01030800b5122f37210003\nPart 1: 00010000000b01030800b5122f372100\nPart 2: 03\nAfter Part 1, buffer: , response_called: False\n",
"stderr": "DEBUG:pymodbus.logging:Frame check failed, ignoring!!\nDEBUG:pymodbus.logging:Resetting frame - Current Frame in buffer - 0x0 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x0 0xb 0x1 0x3 0x8 0x0 0xb5 0x12 0x2f 0x37 0x21 0x0\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"<stdin>\", line 51, in <module>\n File \"/workspace/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py\", line 136, in frameProcessIncomingPacket\n self._process(callback, tid, error=True)\n File \"/workspace/pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py\", line 152, in _process\n if (result := self.decoder.decode(data)) is None:\nAttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'decode'\n",
"exit_code": 1
}
}Generated tokens 823 tokens · stopped: STOP
Only used in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
Now let's create a reproduction script.
The user provided a script and logs. I can simulate the split packet by creating a mock transport or just a small test case.
Actually, the easiest way to reproduce this is to call `frameProcessIncomingPacket` twice with split data.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY'
import struct
from pymodbus.framer.socket_framer import ModbusSocketFramer
from pymodbus.logging import Log
import logging
# Setup logging to capture the "Frame check failed" message
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)
class MockClient:
def __init__(self):
self.response_called = False
def handle_response(self, response):
self.response_called = True
print(f"Response received: {response}")
decoder = None # Not used for this test
client = MockClient()
framer = ModbusSocketFramer(decoder, client)
# Modbus TCP Response:
# tid=1, pid=0, len=11, uid=1, fcode=3, bcount=8, data=[0, 0xb5, 0x12, 0x2f, 0x37, 0x21, 0x0, 0x3]
# Total bytes: 7 + 11 - 1 = 17 bytes?
# No, length field in MBAP is UID + PDU.
# UID (1) + FCode (1) + ByteCount (1) + Data (8) = 11 bytes.
# Total packet: 6 (tid, pid, len) + 11 = 17 bytes.
packet = struct.pack(">HHHB B B BBBBBBBB", 1, 0, 11, 1, 3, 8, 0, 0xb5, 0x12, 0x2f, 0x37, 0x21, 0x0, 0x3)
print(f"Full packet: {packet.hex()}")
# Split packet: first 16 bytes, then the last 1 byte.
part1 = packet[:16]
part2 = packet[16:]
print(f"Part 1: {part1.hex()}")
print(f"Part 2: {part2.hex()}")
# Process Part 1
framer._buffer = b""
# In a real scenario, processIncomingPacket is called.
# We can call the internal frameProcessIncomingPacket directly.
# since we don't have the base.py processIncomingPacket setup fully here.
# But wait, we can just use the real class if we instantiate it.
# Actually, let's just manually add to buffer and call frameProcessIncomingPacket.
framer._buffer = part1
framer.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single=False, callback=client.handle_response, slave=[1])
print(f"After Part 1, buffer: {framer._buffer.hex()}, response_called: {client.response_called}")
# Process Part 2
framer._buffer += part2
framer.frameProcessIncomingPacket(single=False, callback=client.handle_response, slave=[1])
print(f"After Part 2, buffer: {framer._buffer.hex()}, response_called: {client.response_called}")
if client.response_called:
print("SUCCESS: Response was processed!")
else:
print("FAILURE: Response was not processed!")
PY
<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Patch, tests and logs
Final code change Included
Test output Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Test errors Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Test report (JUnit) Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Agent log Included
[ 0.0s] 📋 System Prompt: You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`.
[ 0.0s] 🎯 Task Prompt: You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository pymodbus-dev/pymodbus.
[ 91.9s] 💭 (3366 chars) "The user is reporting an issue where `pymodbus` (specifically `AsyncModbusTcpClient`) fails
to handle TCP segments that ..."
[ 91.9s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn --include="*.py" "processIncomingPacket" pymodbus/framer/
[ 91.9s] → pymodbus/framer/base.py:115: def processIncomingPacket(self, data, callback, slave, **kwargs):
[ 97.8s] 💭 (176 chars) "Wait, only `base.py` has `processIncomingPacket`? No, the traceback mentioned
`socket_framer.py` had `frameProcessIncomi..."
[ 97.8s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn --include="*.py" "frameProcessIncomingPacket" pymodbus/framer/
[ 97.9s] → pymodbus/framer/binary_framer.py:121: def frameProcessIncomingPacket(self, single, callback, slave,
_tid=None, **kwar
[ 101.7s] 💭 (116 chars) "Okay, so `socket_framer.py` implements `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
Let's read `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`."
[ 101.7s] 📖 read_file (pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py)
[ 101.7s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py', 'content': '"""Socket framer."""\n#
pylint: disable=mis…
[ 166.9s] 💭 (3917 chars) "Let's look at `frameProcessIncomingPacket` and `checkFrame`.
```python
def checkFrame(self):
"""Check and d..."
[ 166.9s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn "def resetFrame" pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py
[ 166.9s] → error (exit 0):
[ 169.6s] 💭 (39 chars) "Ah, `resetFrame` might be in `base.py`."
[ 169.6s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn "def resetFrame" pymodbus/framer/base.py
[ 169.6s] → 81: def resetFrame(self):
[ 173.5s] 💭 (67 chars) "Let's read `pymodbus/framer/base.py` to see what `resetFrame` does."
[ 173.5s] 📖 read_file (pymodbus/framer/base.py)
[ 173.5s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'pymodbus/framer/base.py', 'content': ' return
self.client.send(message)\n\n def …
[ 371.0s] 💭 (11664 chars) "So `resetFrame` just clears the buffer.
Back to `pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py`:
```python
def frameProcessInco..."
[ 371.0s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn "checkFrame" pymodbus/framer/socket_framer.py
[ 371.1s] → 50: def checkFrame(self):
[ 443.3s] 💭 (316 chars) "Only used in `frameProcessIncomingPacket`.
Now let's create a reproduction script.
The user provided a script and logs...."
[ 443.3s] 🔧 run_command (59 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
[ 443.4s] → error (exit 0):
Native result row
{
"agent_error": "Agent exceeded session timeout (7.5 min)",
"duration_seconds": 468.63,
"error": "Empty agent patch",
"grade": {
"error": "Empty agent patch",
"resolved": false,
"strict_clean_patch": false,
"test_exit_code": -1
},
"instance_id": "pymodbus-dev__pymodbus-1923",
"pass_idx": 0,
"patch_chars": 0,
"phase1_seconds": 468.63,
"repo": "pymodbus-dev/pymodbus",
"request_log_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/requests/pymodbus-dev__pymodbus-1923__p0__r5.jsonl",
"resolved": false,
"rollout_idx": 5,
"run_key": "pymodbus-dev__pymodbus-1923__p0__r5",
"strict_clean_patch": false,
"tool_calls": 8,
"total_llm_calls": 8,
"trace_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/traces/trace_pymodbus-dev__pymodbus-1923__p0__r5.json"
}