ROLLOUT 7 · python-tap/tappy
python-tap__tappy-112
Solved
289 stotal time
12tool calls
14model calls
4,454tokens generated
139,767prompt tokens read
No error recorded
⚠ The request log has 13 model calls but the trace has 15 agent calls, so tokens are listed separately instead of beside each turn.
Turn by turn
Token shading: p ≥ 0.9 0.5 – 0.9 0.2 – 0.5 below 0.2. Hover a token for its id and probability.
System instructions 4,822 characters
You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`. Your sole objective is to produce a minimal, root-cause source patch that passes every hidden fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass regression test on the first grading run. ## Critical Environment & Grader Rules 1. **Air-Gapped Sandbox & Available CLI Tools**: No network access. Never run `pip`, `uv`, `conda`, or `git fetch`. Note: `rg` (`ripgrep`) is NOT installed in the container — always use `grep -rn --include="*.py"` for fast exact searches so you never waste a tool call on `command not found`. 2. **Protected Grading Paths**: Before running official verification, the grading harness **strips and reverts all changes** to `tests/`, `test/`, `testing/`, `test_*.py`, `*_test.py`, `conftest.py`, `pyproject.toml`, `setup.cfg`, `pytest.ini`, and `tox.ini`. Every part of your fix MUST reside in non-test production source files. 3. **Untracked File Trap (`git add -N .`)**: `submit_patch` stages ALL untracked files inside `/workspace`! Never leave reproduction or scratch files inside `/workspace` — run reproductions inline via `python3 - <<'PY'` or inside `/tmp/repro.py` in a single `run_command`. 4. **Stdout Truncation Rule**: `run_command` truncates stdout after the first 5,000 characters from the TOP. Always run pytest quietly with short tracebacks: `pytest path/to/test_file.py -k pattern -q --tb=short --no-header` If a test file is large, redirect output to `/tmp/pytest.log` and inspect `tail -n 80 /tmp/pytest.log` so failure tracebacks at the bottom are never cut off. 5. **Strict Pacing Discipline**: `get_status` and `submit_patch` are free and do NOT count toward `max_tool_calls`. Target **16-22 counted tool calls total**, and **begin your first `edit_file` change no later than tool call 15**. Reserve at least 4 calls for verification, `git status --short && git diff`, and submission. ## Execution Protocol ### Phase 1 — Pinpoint Code & Tests Immediately (1-2 tool calls) - The user message already contains `Workspace Layout` — do NOT waste a turn running `ls` on top-level directories. - Run a single compound `run_command` with `grep -rn --include="*.py"` to locate: (a) the exact symbols, error strings, or functions from the problem description, (b) **all parallel or sibling implementations** (for example sync + async variants, `Client` + `AsyncClient`, serializer + deserializer, multiple backends/dialects, base + subclass methods, `__init__.py` / `__all__` exports), and (c) the closest existing unit test files under `tests/`. ### Phase 2 — Deep Read & Spec Anchor (2-5 tool calls) - Use `read_file` with generous `start_line` and `end_line` windows (180-300 lines per call so you read whole modules in fewer calls) on the target function/class, callers, type annotations, and neighboring tests. - Before editing, verify every explicit and implicit requirement from the issue: exact parameter names, defaults, boundary/domain edge cases, exception types/messages, `None` vs empty collection vs falsy (`0`, `False`, `""`) semantics, mutability/copying, and return types. ### Phase 3 — Reproduce Bug in One Call (1 tool call) - Run ONE concise command (`python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` or targeted `pytest ... -q --tb=short --no-header`) via `run_command` to observe the exact pre-fix failure. Do NOT spend multiple tool calls writing separate reproduction scripts. ### Phase 4 — Surgical Implementation Across All Parallel Paths (1-4 tool calls) - Begin editing by tool call 15! Use `edit_file` with 4-6 lines of exact surrounding context copied from `read_file`. - Update ALL parallel codepaths (sync/async, multiple classes/dialects, type hints) consistently so partial fixes do not fail sibling tests. - **2-Strike Edit Rule**: If `edit_file` fails twice on the same block due to whitespace or escaping, do not retry `edit_file` a third time — apply an atomic Python transformation via `run_command` and immediately verify `python3 -m py_compile path/to/file.py`. ### Phase 5 — Edge-Case Verification, Diff Hygiene & Clean Exit (2-4 tool calls) - Run a single compound `run_command` testing both your reproduction + boundary edge cases (`None`, empty input, leading/trailing delimiters, subdomain/prefix boundaries, subclass/async parity) AND the relevant existing `pytest` module(s) with `-q --tb=short --no-header`. - Run `git status --short && git diff` via `run_command`. Confirm: - ZERO untracked (`??`) files in `/workspace` (`rm -f` any untracked workspace files immediately), - ZERO modifications to `tests/` or protected config files (`git checkout -- tests/` if touched), - Minimal, clean diff with valid imports and indentation. - Call `submit_patch` once verification passes, then respond with a brief 2-sentence plain-text summary and make NO further tool calls.
Task prompt 5,407 characters
You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository python-tap/tappy.
Problem Statement:
Additional newlines added in YAML blocks for multi-line strings
Hello!
I've observed that `_extract_yaml_block()` performs `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` without having stripped the newline character in each possible line, resulting in unwanted empty lines when parsing multi-line strings in YAML blocks.
I'll give an example. With this file:
```python
#!/usr/bin/python3
import tap.parser
tap_input = """TAP version 13
1..2
ok 1 A passing test
---
message: test
severity: fail
output: |+
this is a multiline
string but with tap
somehow blank lines
are added to it.
"""
parser = tap.parser.Parser()
for i, l in enumerate(parser.parse_text(tap_input)):
if i == 2:
print("{!r}".format(l.yaml_block["output"].splitlines()))
```
The output is:
```
['', 'this is a multiline', '', 'string but with tap', '', 'somehow blank lines', '', 'are added to it.']
```
Where as I expected:
```
['this is a multiline', 'string but with tap', 'somehow blank lines', 'are added to it.']
```
I will submit a PR shortly.
## Hints:
codecov-io: # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112?src=pr&el=h1) Report
> Merging [#112](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112?src=pr&el=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/commit/015c21c1a98b88f23844a44e346604f2398b11d5&el=desc) will **not change** coverage.
> The diff coverage is `100.00%`.
[](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112?src=pr&el=tree)
```diff
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #112 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 599 600 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 599 600 +1
```
| [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112?src=pr&el=tree) | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| [tap/parser.py](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112/diff?src=pr&el=tree#diff-dGFwL3BhcnNlci5weQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | |
------
[Continue to review full report at Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112?src=pr&el=continue).
> **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta)
> `Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data`
> Powered by [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112?src=pr&el=footer). Last update [015c21c...05c6b82](https://codecov.io/gh/python-tap/tappy/pull/112?src=pr&el=lastupdated). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments).
## Task Budget (Session terminates when any budget is exhausted)
- Time allowance: 7.5 minutes
- Tool calls allowance: 30 calls
- Max loop iterations: 40 turns
## Execution Environment Rules
- Single command timeout: 90 seconds (commands exceeding this fail without ending the session)
- Command output limit: 5000 characters
- File view limit: 150 lines per read_file call
- File character limit: 10000 characters per read_file call
- Environment is offline (no network/PyPI access). All repository and test dependencies are ALREADY pre-installed. Do NOT attempt to run pip install or download packages.
## Instructions:
0. All source code is under `/workspace`. Do NOT search outside `/workspace` (e.g. `/usr/`, `/wheels/`, system site-packages). If imports fail, the issue is in the source code under `/workspace`, not in missing system packages.
1. Analyze the problem statement and any provided hints carefully to identify all requested script paths, CLI subcommands, or Python modules.
2. Inspect existing codebase conventions and test files before making edits.
3. Verify your implementation using targeted tests or inline assertions before submitting.
4. Call submit_patch only after your implementation is complete and verified.
5. As your final action, you must return a text-only response reporting your completion to terminate the session.
## Workspace Layout
The repository is located at `/workspace`. Here is the directory tree (up to 3 levels):
```
./AUTHORS
./CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
./LICENSE
./MANIFEST.in
./README.md
./appveyor.yml
./docs
./requirements-dev.txt
./setup.cfg
./setup.py
./tap
./tap/__init__.py
./tap/__main__.py
./tap/adapter.py
./tap/directive.py
./tap/formatter.py
./tap/i18n.py
./tap/line.py
./tap/loader.py
./tap/locale
./tap/locale/ar
./tap/locale/de
./tap/locale/es
./tap/locale/fr
./tap/locale/it
./tap/locale/ja
./tap/locale/nl
./tap/locale/pt
./tap/locale/ru
./tap/locale/tappy.pot
./tap/locale/zh
./tap/main.py
./tap/parser.py
./tap/rules.py
./tap/runner.py
./tap/tests
./tap/tests/__init__.py
./tap/tests/factory.py
./tap/tests/run.py
./tap/tests/test_adapter.py
./tap/tests/test_directive.py
./tap/tests/test_formatter.py
./tap/tests/test_line.py
./tap/tests/test_loader.py
./tap/tests/test_main.py
./tap/tests/test_parser.py
./tap/tests/test_result.py
./tap/tests/test_rules.py
./tap/tests/test_runner.py
./tap/tests/test_tracker.py
./tap/tests/testcase.py
./tap/tracker.py
./tox.ini
./transifex.py
```
Turn 1at 19 s290 tokens out3,856 prompt tokens
The user is reporting a bug in `tap.parser._extract_yaml_block`. It seems that `_extract_yaml_block` joins lines using `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` without removing the trailing newline from each line in `raw_yaml`, leading to double newlines in the result. I need to: 1. Reproduce the bug. 2. Locate `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py`. 3. Fix the bug. 4. Verify the fix. Let's start by reproducing the bug using the provided example code.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nimport tap.parser\n\ntap_input = \"\"\"TAP version 13\n1..2\nok 1 A passing test\n ---\n message: test\n severity: fail\n output: |+\n this is a multiline\n string but with tap\n somehow blank lines\n are added to it.\n\"\"\"\nparser = tap.parser.Parser()\n\nfor i, l in enumerate(parser.parse_text(tap_input)):\n if i == 2:\n print(\"{!r}\".format(l.yaml_block[\"output\"].splitlines()))\nPY\n"
}Result of run_command 167 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "['', 'this is a multiline', '', 'string but with tap', '', 'somehow blank lines', '', 'are added to it.']\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Turn 2at 24 s115 tokens out4,218 prompt tokens
The reproduction confirms the bug. The output is `['', 'this is a multiline', '', 'string but with tap', '', 'somehow blank lines', '', 'are added to it.']` instead of `['this is a multiline', 'string but with tap', 'somehow blank lines', 'are added to it.']`. Now let's locate `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"filepath": "tap/parser.py"
}Result of read_file 5,409 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "tap/parser.py",
"content": "# Copyright (c) 2019, Matt Layman and contributors\n\nfrom io import StringIO\nimport itertools\nimport re\nimport sys\n\nfrom tap.directive import Directive\nfrom tap.i18n import _\nfrom tap.line import Bail, Diagnostic, Plan, Result, Unknown, Version\n\ntry:\n from more_itertools import peekable\n import yaml # noqa\n\n ENABLE_VERSION_13 = True\nexcept ImportError: # pragma: no cover\n ENABLE_VERSION_13 = False\n\n\nclass Parser(object):\n \"\"\"A parser for TAP files and lines.\"\"\"\n\n # ok and not ok share most of the same characteristics.\n result_base = r\"\"\"\n \\s* # Optional whitespace.\n (?P<number>\\d*) # Optional test number.\n \\s* # Optional whitespace.\n (?P<description>[^#]*) # Optional description before #.\n \\#? # Optional directive marker.\n \\s* # Optional whitespace.\n (?P<directive>.*) # Optional directive text.\n \"\"\"\n ok = re.compile(r\"^ok\" + result_base, re.VERBOSE)\n not_ok = re.compile(r\"^not\\ ok\" + result_base, re.VERBOSE)\n plan = re.compile(\n r\"\"\"\n ^1..(?P<expected>\\d+) # Match the plan details.\n [^#]* # Consume any non-hash character to confirm only\n # directives appear with the plan details.\n \\#? # Optional directive marker.\n \\s* # Optional whitespace.\n (?P<directive>.*) # Optional directive text.\n \"\"\",\n re.VERBOSE,\n )\n diagnostic = re.compile(r\"^#\")\n bail = re.compile(\n r\"\"\"\n ^Bail\\ out!\n \\s* # Optional whitespace.\n (?P<reason>.*) # Optional reason.\n \"\"\",\n re.VERBOSE,\n )\n version = re.compile(r\"^TAP version (?P<version>\\d+)$\")\n\n yaml_block_start = re.compile(r\"^(?P<indent>\\s+)-\")\n yaml_block_end = re.compile(r\"^\\s+\\.\\.\\.\")\n\n TAP_MINIMUM_DECLARED_VERSION = 13\n\n def parse_file(self, filename):\n \"\"\"Parse a TAP file to an iterable of tap.line.Line objects.\n\n This is a generator method that will yield an object for each\n parsed line. The file given by `filename` is assumed to exist.\n \"\"\"\n return self.parse(open(filename, \"r\"))\n\n def parse_stdin(self):\n \"\"\"Parse a TAP stream from standard input.\n\n Note: this has the side effect of closing the standard input\n filehandle after parsing.\n \"\"\"\n return self.parse(sys.stdin)\n\n def parse_text(self, text):\n \"\"\"Parse a string containing one or more lines of TAP output.\"\"\"\n return self.parse(StringIO(text))\n\n def parse(self, fh):\n \"\"\"Generate tap.line.Line objects, given a file-like object `fh`.\n\n `fh` may be any object that implements both the iterator and\n context management protocol (i.e. it can be used in both a\n \"with\" statement and a \"for...in\" statement.)\n\n Trailing whitespace and newline characters will be automatically\n stripped from the input lines.\n \"\"\"\n with fh:\n try:\n first_line = next(fh)\n except StopIteration:\n return\n first_parsed = self.parse_line(first_line.rstrip())\n fh_new = itertools.chain([first_line], fh)\n if first_parsed.category == \"version\" and first_parsed.version >= 13:\n if ENABLE_VERSION_13:\n fh_new = peekable(itertools.chain([first_line], fh))\n else: # pragma no cover\n print(\n \"\"\"\nWARNING: Optional imports not found, TAP 13 output will be\n ignored. To parse yaml, see requirements in docs:\n https://tappy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/consumers.html#tap-version-13\"\"\"\n )\n\n for line in fh_new:\n yield self.parse_line(line.rstrip(), fh_new)\n\n def parse_line(self, text, fh=None):\n \"\"\"Parse a line into whatever TAP category it belongs.\"\"\"\n match = self.ok.match(text)\n if match:\n return self._parse_result(True, match, fh)\n\n match = self.not_ok.match(text)\n if match:\n return self._parse_result(False, match, fh)\n\n if self.diagnostic.match(text):\n return Diagnostic(text)\n\n match = self.plan.match(text)\n if match:\n return self._parse_plan(match)\n\n match = self.bail.match(text)\n if match:\n return Bail(match.group(\"reason\"))\n\n match = self.version.match(text)\n if match:\n return self._parse_version(match)\n\n return Unknown()\n\n def _parse_plan(self, match):\n \"\"\"Parse a matching plan line.\"\"\"\n expected_tests = int(match.group(\"expected\"))\n directive = Directive(match.group(\"directive\"))\n\n # Only SKIP directives are allowed in the plan.\n if directive.text and not directive.skip:\n return Unknown()\n\n return Plan(expected_tests, directive)",
"start_line": 1,
"end_line": 150,
"total_lines": 199,
"is_truncated": true
}Turn 3at 28 s59 tokens out5,868 prompt tokens
I need to read the rest of the `Parser` class in `tap/parser.py`, specifically looking for `_extract_yaml_block`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"filepath": "tap/parser.py`,start_line:151"
}Result of read_file 423 characters
{
"status": "error",
"error_type": "FileReadError",
"error_message": "404 Client Error for http+docker://localhost/v1.52/containers/79b44dbb367a95fb635a30abd8de80f33a2d9f0389437dd943f62fa991d88db2/archive?path=%2Fworkspace%2Ftap%2Fparser.py%60%2Cstart_line%3A151: Not Found (\"Could not find the file /workspace/tap/parser.py`,start_line:151 in container 79b44dbb367a95fb635a30abd8de80f33a2d9f0389437dd943f62fa991d88db2\")"
}Turn 4at 58 s459 tokens out6,160 prompt tokens
Ah, I made a mistake in the `read_file` call by not providing the `filepath` as a separate argument. Wait, I did providing it. Let me look at the tool definition.
`read_file(filepath, start_line=None, end_line=None)`
The error message says: `Could not find the file /workspace/tap/parser.py`,start_line:151`. It looks like the tool implementation might have had an issue or I misread the response.
Wait, the tool call was:
`read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py", start_line: 151}`
The error message: `404 Client Error for http+docker://.../archive?path=%2Fworkspace%2Ftap%2Fparser.py%60%2Cstart_line%3A151: Not Found`
It seems it's trying to fetch the file with `start_line` in the path? That's weird. Let me check my previous `read_file` calls.
First call: `read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py"}` - OK.
Second call: `read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py", start_line: 151}` - FAILED.
Ah, I see what happened. I might have messed up the syntax in my thought process or the tool call. Let me just try again with both `start_line` and `end_line`. Actually, the file only has 199 lines, so I can just read from 151 to 200.
Wait, the error message shows `%2Fworkspace%2Ftap%2Fparser.py%60%2Cstart_line%3A151`. This looks like it's taking the whole thing as a path including the comma.
Let me try and just read the rest of the file.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"end_line": 200,
"filepath": "tap/parser.py",
"start_line": 151
}Result of read_file 2,095 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "tap/parser.py",
"content": "\n def _parse_result(self, ok, match, fh=None):\n \"\"\"Parse a matching result line into a result instance.\"\"\"\n peek_match = None\n try:\n if fh is not None and ENABLE_VERSION_13 and isinstance(fh, peekable):\n peek_match = self.yaml_block_start.match(fh.peek())\n except StopIteration:\n pass\n if peek_match is None:\n return Result(\n ok,\n number=match.group(\"number\"),\n description=match.group(\"description\").strip(),\n directive=Directive(match.group(\"directive\")),\n )\n indent = peek_match.group(\"indent\")\n concat_yaml = self._extract_yaml_block(indent, fh)\n return Result(\n ok,\n number=match.group(\"number\"),\n description=match.group(\"description\").strip(),\n directive=Directive(match.group(\"directive\")),\n raw_yaml_block=concat_yaml,\n )\n\n def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):\n \"\"\"Extract a raw yaml block from a file handler\"\"\"\n raw_yaml = []\n indent_match = re.compile(r\"^{}\".format(indent))\n try:\n next(fh)\n while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):\n raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, \"\", 1))\n # check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered\n if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):\n next(fh)\n break\n except StopIteration:\n pass\n return \"\\n\".join(raw_yaml)\n\n def _parse_version(self, match):\n version = int(match.group(\"version\"))\n if version < self.TAP_MINIMUM_DECLARED_VERSION:\n raise ValueError(\n _(\"It is an error to explicitly specify any version lower than 13.\")\n )\n return Version(version)",
"start_line": 151,
"end_line": 199,
"total_lines": 199,
"is_truncated": false
}Turn 5at 124 s1,075 tokens out7,208 prompt tokens
I found `_extract_yaml_block`:
```python
def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):
"""Extract a raw yaml block from a file handler"""
raw_yaml = []
indent_match = re.compile(r"^{}".format(indent))
try:
next(fh)
while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):
raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))
# check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
except StopIteration:
pass
return "\n".join(raw_yaml)
```
The `next(fh)` call inside the `while` loop gets a line from the file handler. The file handler `fh` in `parse` method is the original file object (or a `peekable` wrapper around it).
In `parse` method:
```python
def parse(self, fh):
# ...
for line in fh_new:
yield self.parse_line(line.rstrip(), fh_new)
```
Wait, `line.rstrip()` is called before passing `text` to `parse_line`.
However, `_extract_yaml_block` uses `next(fh)`, which gets the *original* line including the newline character (unless `rstrip` was used elsewhere).
Let's look at how `fh` is used in `_extract_yaml_block`. It's the `fh_new` from `parse`.
`fh_new` is either `itertools.chain([first_line], fh)` or `peekable(itertools.chain([first_line], fh))`.
`first_line` was `next(fh)`, which includes the newline.
The lines in `fh` also include newlines.
So `next(fh)` returns a line like `" this is a multiline\n"`.
And `replace(indent, "", 1)` removes the leading indentation, leaving `"this is a multiline\n"`.
Then `raw_yaml.append("this is a multiline\n")` happens.
Finally, `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` results in `"this is a multiline\n\n"`.
That's exactly why we get double newlines.
To fix this, we should remove the trailing newline character from the line before appending it to `raw_yaml`.
But we must be careful: we only want to remove the *trailing* newline, not all trailing whitespace (since YAML might have meaningful trailing whitespace, though usually not). However, since the parser is designed to handle TAP and the `parse` method uses `line.rstrip()`, maybe we should be consistent.
Actually, YAML blocks in TAP 13 should preserve the content of the YAML. If we use `rstrip()`, we might lose trailing spaces which might be important for some YAML values. But usually, it's the trailing newline that is the problem.
The issue reporter says: `_extract_yaml_block() performs "\n".join(raw_yaml) without having stripped the newline character in each possible line`.
So if we change `raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))` to `raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))`, it should fix it.
Wait, if we do `rstrip('\n\r')` first, then `replace(indent, "", 1)` might not work if the indentation was removed from the end? No, indentation is at the beginning.
Wait, `indent` is a string of spaces. `replace(indent, "", 1)` replaces the first occurrence of `indent`. If `indent` is `" "`, and the line is `" this is a multiline\n"`, then `replace` makes it `"this is a multiline\n"`.
If we do:
```python
line = next(fh)
line = line.rstrip('\n\r')
line = line.replace(indent, "", 1)
raw_yaml.append(line)
```
This should work.
Let's check if there are other places where `_extract_yaml_block` is used. It's only used in `_parse_result`.
Is there any other parallel path?
The `Parser` class seems to be the only one doing this.
Wait, I should check if there are any tests for YAML blocks.
`tap/tests/test_parser.py` likely has some.
Let's look at `tap/tests/test_parser.py`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "grep -rn \"yaml\" tap/tests/test_parser.py"
}Result of run_command 1,867 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "14: import yaml\n17: have_yaml = True\n19: have_yaml = False\n222: self.assertIsNone(lines[1].yaml_block)\n226: def test_parses_yaml(self):\n232: test: sample yaml\n242: if have_yaml:\n243: converted_yaml = yaml.safe_load(u\"\"\"test: sample yaml\"\"\")\n246: self.assertEqual(converted_yaml, lines[2].yaml_block)\n248: self.assertIsNone(lines[3].yaml_block)\n265: test: sample yaml\n279: if have_yaml:\n297: if have_yaml:\n310: def test_parses_yaml_no_end(self):\n316: test: sample yaml\n325: if have_yaml:\n326: converted_yaml = yaml.safe_load(u\"\"\"test: sample yaml\"\"\")\n329: self.assertEqual(converted_yaml, lines[2].yaml_block)\n331: self.assertIsNone(lines[3].yaml_block)\n339: def test_parses_yaml_more_complex(self):\n359: if have_yaml:\n360: converted_yaml = yaml.safe_load(\n372: self.assertEqual(converted_yaml, lines[2].yaml_block)\n379: def test_parses_yaml_no_association(self):\n386: test: sample yaml\n398: self.assertIsNone(lines[2].yaml_block)\n404: def test_parses_yaml_no_start(self):\n409: test: sample yaml\n421: self.assertIsNone(lines[2].yaml_block)\n426: def test_malformed_yaml(self):\n433: test: sample yaml\n438: yaml_err = inspect.cleandoc(\n441: ignored. To parse yaml, see requirements in docs:\n451: if have_yaml:\n455: self.assertIsNone(lines[2].yaml_block)\n457: \"Error parsing yaml block. Check formatting.\", out.getvalue().strip()\n460: self.assertIsNone(lines[3].yaml_block)\n467: self.assertEqual(yaml_err, parse_out.getvalue().strip())\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Turn 6at 128 s71 tokens out8,952 prompt tokens
Let's read `tap/tests/test_parser.py` around line 226 for `test_parses_yaml`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"end_line": 350,
"filepath": "tap/tests/test_parser.py",
"start_line": 220
}Result of read_file 5,507 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "tap/tests/test_parser.py",
"content": " self.assertEqual(\"test\", lines[1].category)\n self.assertTrue(lines[1].ok)\n self.assertIsNone(lines[1].yaml_block)\n self.assertEqual(\"test\", lines[2].category)\n self.assertFalse(lines[2].ok)\n\n def test_parses_yaml(self):\n sample = inspect.cleandoc(\n u\"\"\"TAP version 13\n 1..2\n ok 1 A passing test\n ---\n test: sample yaml\n ...\n not ok 2 A failing test\"\"\"\n )\n parser = Parser()\n lines = []\n\n for line in parser.parse_text(sample):\n lines.append(line)\n\n if have_yaml:\n converted_yaml = yaml.safe_load(u\"\"\"test: sample yaml\"\"\")\n self.assertEqual(4, len(lines))\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n self.assertEqual(converted_yaml, lines[2].yaml_block)\n self.assertEqual(\"test\", lines[3].category)\n self.assertIsNone(lines[3].yaml_block)\n else:\n self.assertEqual(7, len(lines))\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n for l in list(range(3, 6)):\n self.assertEqual(\"unknown\", lines[l].category)\n self.assertEqual(\"test\", lines[6].category)\n\n def test_parses_mixed(self):\n # Test that we can parse both a version 13 and earlier version files\n # using the same parser. Make sure that parsing works regardless of\n # the order of the incoming documents.\n sample_version_13 = inspect.cleandoc(\n u\"\"\"TAP version 13\n 1..2\n ok 1 A passing version 13 test\n ---\n test: sample yaml\n ...\n not ok 2 A failing version 13 test\"\"\"\n )\n sample_pre_13 = inspect.cleandoc(\n \"\"\"1..2\n ok 1 A passing pre-13 test\n not ok 2 A failing pre-13 test\"\"\"\n )\n\n parser = Parser()\n lines = []\n lines.extend(parser.parse_text(sample_version_13))\n lines.extend(parser.parse_text(sample_pre_13))\n if have_yaml:\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing version 13 test\", lines[2].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing version 13 test\", lines[3].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing pre-13 test\", lines[5].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing pre-13 test\", lines[6].description)\n else:\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing version 13 test\", lines[2].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing version 13 test\", lines[6].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing pre-13 test\", lines[8].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing pre-13 test\", lines[9].description)\n\n # Test parsing documents in reverse order\n parser = Parser()\n lines = []\n lines.extend(parser.parse_text(sample_pre_13))\n lines.extend(parser.parse_text(sample_version_13))\n if have_yaml:\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing pre-13 test\", lines[1].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing pre-13 test\", lines[2].description)\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[3].version)\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing version 13 test\", lines[5].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing version 13 test\", lines[6].description)\n else:\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing pre-13 test\", lines[1].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing pre-13 test\", lines[2].description)\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[3].version)\n self.assertEqual(\"A passing version 13 test\", lines[5].description)\n self.assertEqual(\"A failing version 13 test\", lines[9].description)\n\n def test_parses_yaml_no_end(self):\n sample = inspect.cleandoc(\n u\"\"\"TAP version 13\n 1..2\n ok 1 A passing test\n ---\n test: sample yaml\n not ok 2 A failing test\"\"\"\n )\n parser = Parser()\n lines = []\n\n for line in parser.parse_text(sample):\n lines.append(line)\n\n if have_yaml:\n converted_yaml = yaml.safe_load(u\"\"\"test: sample yaml\"\"\")\n self.assertEqual(4, len(lines))\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n self.assertEqual(converted_yaml, lines[2].yaml_block)\n self.assertEqual(\"test\", lines[3].category)\n self.assertIsNone(lines[3].yaml_block)\n else:\n self.assertEqual(6, len(lines))\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n for l in list(range(3, 5)):\n self.assertEqual(\"unknown\", lines[l].category)\n self.assertEqual(\"test\", lines[5].category)\n\n def test_parses_yaml_more_complex(self):\n sample = inspect.cleandoc(\n u\"\"\"TAP version 13\n 1..2\n ok 1 A passing test\n ---\n message: test\n severity: fail\n data:\n got:\n - foo\n expect:",
"start_line": 220,
"end_line": 350,
"total_lines": 500,
"is_truncated": false
}Turn 7at 132 s69 tokens out10,584 prompt tokens
I want to see the end of `test_parses_yaml_more_complex` to see if it exercises multiline strings.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
"end_line": 400,
"filepath": "tap/tests/test_parser.py",
"start_line": 350
}Result of read_file 1,729 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "tap/tests/test_parser.py",
"content": " expect:\n - bar\"\"\"\n )\n parser = Parser()\n lines = []\n\n for line in parser.parse_text(sample):\n lines.append(line)\n\n if have_yaml:\n converted_yaml = yaml.safe_load(\n u\"\"\"\n message: test\n severity: fail\n data:\n got:\n - foo\n expect:\n - bar\"\"\"\n )\n self.assertEqual(3, len(lines))\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n self.assertEqual(converted_yaml, lines[2].yaml_block)\n else:\n self.assertEqual(11, len(lines))\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n for l in list(range(3, 11)):\n self.assertEqual(\"unknown\", lines[l].category)\n\n def test_parses_yaml_no_association(self):\n sample = inspect.cleandoc(\n u\"\"\"TAP version 13\n 1..2\n ok 1 A passing test\n # Diagnostic line\n ---\n test: sample yaml\n ...\n not ok 2 A failing test\"\"\"\n )\n parser = Parser()\n lines = []\n\n for line in parser.parse_text(sample):\n lines.append(line)\n\n self.assertEqual(8, len(lines))\n self.assertEqual(13, lines[0].version)\n self.assertIsNone(lines[2].yaml_block)\n self.assertEqual(\"diagnostic\", lines[3].category)\n for l in list(range(4, 7)):",
"start_line": 350,
"end_line": 400,
"total_lines": 500,
"is_truncated": false
}Turn 8at 249 s1,819 tokens out11,151 prompt tokens
The current tests don't seem to have a multiline string example in the YAML block that would specifically fail with this bug (they use lists and simple keys).
Wait, if the YAML block is just:
```yaml
message: test
severity: fail
```
Then `raw_yaml` will be `["message: test\n", "severity: fail\n"]`.
`"\n".join(raw_yaml)` will be `"message: test\n\nseverity: fail\n"`.
`yaml.safe_load` will probably handle those extra newlines fine because YAML ignores empty lines between key-value pairs.
However, when using a block scalar (like `|+` or `|`), the newlines are part of the value.
Example:
```yaml
output: |+
line 1
line 2
```
If `raw_yaml` is `["output: |+\n", " line 1\n", " line 2\n"]`, then `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` is:
`"output: |+\n\n line 1\n\n line 2\n"`
The `yaml` parser will see this as:
`output` is a block scalar.
The first line after `|+` is an empty line (the `\n` from the join).
Then ` line 1`
Then another empty line.
Then ` line 2`
That's exactly what's happening in the reproduction case.
So the fix is indeed to remove the trailing newline from each line before joining them.
I'll use `rstrip('\n\r')` to be safe and maintain parity with how Python's open() handles universal newlines. Actually, Python 3's `open()` by default handles `\n`, `\r\n`, etc., and returns `\n`. So `line.rstrip('\n')` or `line.rstrip('\r\n')` is not quite right if we want to be通用. `line.rstrip('\n\r')` would remove all trailing newlines/carriage returns.
Wait, the `parse` method uses `line.rstrip()`.
```python
def parse(self, fh):
# ...
for line in fh_new:
yield self.parse_line(line.rstrip(), fh_new)
```
`line.rstrip()` removes all trailing whitespace, including `\n` and also spaces/tabs.
In `_extract_yaml_block`, we are extracting the RAW yaml block. If we use `rstrip()`, we might remove trailing spaces that are meant to be in the YAML block.
YAML block scalars (like `|`) preserve trailing whitespace on lines.
According to YAML spec, block scalars preserve everything including trailing spaces on each line.
If I use `line.rstrip('\n\r')`, I only remove the trailing newline characters.
Let's see:
`line = " this is a line \n"`
`line.rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" this is a line "`
`line.rstrip()` -> `" this is a line"`
So `rstrip('\n\r')` is safer for YAML.
Let's implement the fix.
```python
def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):
"""Extract a raw yaml block from a file handler"""
raw_yaml = []
indent_match = re.compile(r"^{}".format(indent))
try:
next(fh)
while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):
raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))
# check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
except StopIteration:
pass
return "\n".join(raw_yaml)
```
Wait, let me check if I should remove the newline BEFORE or AFTER replacing the indent. It doesn't matter as the indent is at the start and newline is at the end.
Wait, `next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1)` is what it was.
If I do `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1)`, I'm removing the newline and then replacing the indent.
One detail: `next(fh)` in the `while` loop is called. If the block is empty, `raw_yaml` is empty. If it's not, it's populated.
Let's double check the reproduction case.
`tap_input` contains:
```python
---
message: test
severity: fail
output: |+
this is a multiline
string but with tap
somehow blank lines
are added to it.
```
Indent is `" "`.
Lines are:
`" message: test\n"`
`" severity: fail\n"`
`" output: |+\n"`
`" this is a multiline\n"`
`" string but with tap\n"`
`" somehow blank lines\n"`
`" are added to it.\n"`
`_extract_yaml_block` is called with `indent=" "`.
1. `next(fh)` skips `---`.
2. `fh.peek()` is `" message: test\n"`. Matches `indent`.
`next(fh)` -> `" message: test\n"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"message: test\n"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test\n"]`.
3. `fh.peek()` is `" severity: fail\n"`. Matches.
`next(fh)` -> `" severity: fail\n"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"severity: fail\n"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test\n", "severity: fail\n"]`.
...
And so on.
Finally `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` gives `"message: test\n\nseverity: fail\n\n... "`.
With my fix:
2. `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" message: test"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"message: test"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test"]`.
3. `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" severity: fail"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"severity: fail"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test", "severity: fail"]`.
...
Finally `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` gives `"message: test\nseverity: fail\n..."`. This is correct.
Wait, there is one thing. `replace(indent, "", 1)` is called on the line.
If the line is `" this is a multiline\n"` and indent is `" "`.
`rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" this is a multiline"`
`replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `" this is a multiline"`
This is correct, it preserves the relative indentation of the YAML content.
One more thing: `self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek())`.
`yaml_block_end = re.compile(r"^\s+\.\.\.")`.
The `...` marks the end of the YAML block.
In `_extract_yaml_block`:
```python
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
```
This consumes the `...` line.
Let's apply the fix.
TOOL CALL · edit_file
{
"filepath": "tap/parser.py",
"new_string": " raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\\n\\r').replace(indent, \"\", 1))",
"old_string": " raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, \"\", 1))"
}Result of edit_file 590 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"filepath": "tap/parser.py",
"occurrences": 1,
"strategy": "exact",
"diff": "--- a/tap/parser.py\n+++ b/tap/parser.py\n@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@\n try:\n next(fh)\n while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):\n- raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, \"\", 1))\n+ raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\\n\\r').replace(indent, \"\", 1))\n # check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered\n if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):\n next(fh)\n",
"is_truncated": false
}Turn 9at 258 s171 tokens out13,175 prompt tokens
Now let's verify the fix with the reproduction script and the existing tests.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nimport tap.parser\n\ntap_input = \"\"\"TAP version 13\n1..2\nok 1 A passing test\n ---\n message: test\n severity: fail\n output: |+\n this is a multiline\n string but with tap\n somehow blank lines\n are added to it.\n\"\"\"\nparser = tap.parser.Parser()\n\nfor i, l in enumerate(parser.parse_text(tap_input)):\n if i == 2:\n print(\"{!r}\".format(l.yaml_block[\"output\"].splitlines()))\nPY\n"
}Result of run_command 151 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "['this is a multiline', 'string but with tap', 'somehow blank lines', 'are added to it.']\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Turn 10at 262 s51 tokens out13,412 prompt tokens
The reproduction case now passes. Now let's run the existing tests.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "pytest tap/tests/test_parser.py -q --tb=short --no-header"
}Result of run_command 161 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "........................... [100%]\n27 passed in 0.08s\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Turn 11at 268 s87 tokens out13,524 prompt tokens
All tests in `tap/tests/test_parser.py` passed. I should check if any other tests are relevant. `tap/tests/test_result.py` might be relevant since `Result` contains `yaml_block`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "pytest tap/tests/test_result.py -q --tb=short --no-header"
}Result of run_command 160 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": "......... [100%]\n9 passed in 0.02s\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Turn 12at 270 s38 tokens out13,671 prompt tokens
Everything seems correct. I'll do a final check of the diff.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
"command": "git status --short && git diff"
}Result of run_command 683 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"stdout": " M tap/parser.py\ndiff --git a/tap/parser.py b/tap/parser.py\nindex 637436b..6523513 100644\n--- a/tap/parser.py\n+++ b/tap/parser.py\n@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ WARNING: Optional imports not found, TAP 13 output will be\n try:\n next(fh)\n while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):\n- raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, \"\", 1))\n+ raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\\n\\r').replace(indent, \"\", 1))\n # check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered\n if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):\n next(fh)\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0
}Turn 13at 272 s26 tokens out13,962 prompt tokens
The diff is minimal and correct. I'm ready to submit.
TOOL CALL · submit_patch
Result of submit_patch 55 characters
{
"status": "ok",
"patch_size": 586,
"files_changed": 1
}Turn 14at 286 s124 tokens out14,026 prompt tokens
I have reproduced the bug, fixed it, and verified the fix with both the reproduction script and the test suite. The fix correctly handles trailing newlines in YAML blocks without removing meaningful trailing whitespace in the content.
Turn 15at 286 s
The bug was caused by `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py` joining lines with `"\n"` without removing the existing trailing newline characters from each line. This resulted in unwanted empty lines in multiline YAML strings. I fixed this by adding `.rstrip('\n\r')` to the lines before appending them to the `raw_yaml` list.
Model calls (not matched to turns)
Generated tokens 290 tokens · stopped: STOP
The user is reporting a bug in `tap.parser._extract_yaml_block`. It seems that `_extract_yaml_block` joins lines using `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` without removing the trailing newline from each line in `raw_yaml`, leading to double newlines in the result. I need to: 1. Reproduce the bug. 2. Locate `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py`. 3. Fix the bug. 4. Verify the fix. Let's start by reproducing the bug using the provided example code.
<|channel>thought
The user is reporting a bug in `tap.parser._extract_yaml_block`.
It seems that `_extract_yaml_block` joins lines using `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` without removing the trailing newline from each line in `raw_yaml`, leading to double newlines in the result.
I need to:
1. Reproduce the bug.
2. Locate `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py`.
3. Fix the bug.
4. Verify the fix.
Let's start by reproducing the bug using the provided example code.<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY'
import tap.parser
tap_input = """TAP version 13
1..2
ok 1 A passing test
---
message: test
severity: fail
output: |+
this is a multiline
string but with tap
somehow blank lines
are added to it.
"""
parser = tap.parser.Parser()
for i, l in enumerate(parser.parse_text(tap_input)):
if i == 2:
print("{!r}".format(l.yaml_block["output"].splitlines()))
PY
<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 115 tokens · stopped: STOP
The reproduction confirms the bug. The output is `['', 'this is a multiline', '', 'string but with tap', '', 'somehow blank lines', '', 'are added to it.']` instead of `['this is a multiline', 'string but with tap', 'somehow blank lines', 'are added to it.']`. Now let's locate `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py`.
The reproduction confirms the bug. The output is `['', 'this is a multiline', '', 'string but with tap', '', 'somehow blank lines', '', 'are added to it.']` instead of `['this is a multiline', 'string but with tap', 'somehow blank lines', 'are added to it.']`.
Now let's locate `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>tap/parser.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 59 tokens · stopped: STOP
I need to read the rest of the `Parser` class in `tap/parser.py`, specifically looking for `_extract_yaml_block`.
I need to read the rest of the `Parser` class in `tap/parser.py`, specifically looking for `_extract_yaml_block`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>tap/parser.py`,start_line:151}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 459 tokens · stopped: STOP
Ah, I made a mistake in the `read_file` call by not providing the `filepath` as a separate argument. Wait, I did providing it. Let me look at the tool definition.
`read_file(filepath, start_line=None, end_line=None)`
The error message says: `Could not find the file /workspace/tap/parser.py`,start_line:151`. It looks like the tool implementation might have had an issue or I misread the response.
Wait, the tool call was:
`read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py", start_line: 151}`
The error message: `404 Client Error for http+docker://.../archive?path=%2Fworkspace%2Ftap%2Fparser.py%60%2Cstart_line%3A151: Not Found`
It seems it's trying to fetch the file with `start_line` in the path? That's weird. Let me check my previous `read_file` calls.
First call: `read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py"}` - OK.
Second call: `read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py", start_line: 151}` - FAILED.
Ah, I see what happened. I might have messed up the syntax in my thought process or the tool call. Let me just try again with both `start_line` and `end_line`. Actually, the file only has 199 lines, so I can just read from 151 to 200.
Wait, the error message shows `%2Fworkspace%2Ftap%2Fparser.py%60%2Cstart_line%3A151`. This looks like it's taking the whole thing as a path including the comma.
Let me try and just read the rest of the file.
Ah, I made a mistake in the `read_file` call by not providing the `filepath` as a separate argument. Wait, I did providing it. Let me look at the tool definition.
`read_file(filepath, start_line=None, end_line=None)`
The error message says: `Could not find the file /workspace/tap/parser.py`,start_line:151`. It looks like the tool implementation might have had an issue or I misread the response.
Wait, the tool call was:
`read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py", start_line: 151}`
The error message: `404 Client Error for http+docker://.../archive?path=%2Fworkspace%2Ftap%2Fparser.py%60%2Cstart_line%3A151: Not Found`
It seems it's trying to fetch the file with `start_line` in the path? That's weird. Let me check my previous `read_file` calls.
First call: `read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py"}` - OK.
Second call: `read_file{filepath: "tap/parser.py", start_line: 151}` - FAILED.
Ah, I see what happened. I might have messed up the syntax in my thought process or the tool call. Let me just try again with both `start_line` and `end_line`. Actually, the file only has 199 lines, so I can just read from 151 to 200.
Wait, the error message shows `%2Fworkspace%2Ftap%2Fparser.py%60%2Cstart_line%3A151`. This looks like it's taking the whole thing as a path including the comma.
Let me try and just read the rest of the file.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{end_line:200,filepath:<|"|>tap/parser.py<|"|>,start_line:151}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 1,075 tokens · stopped: STOP
I found `_extract_yaml_block`:
```python
def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):
"""Extract a raw yaml block from a file handler"""
raw_yaml = []
indent_match = re.compile(r"^{}".format(indent))
try:
next(fh)
while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):
raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))
# check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
except StopIteration:
pass
return "\n".join(raw_yaml)
```
The `next(fh)` call inside the `while` loop gets a line from the file handler. The file handler `fh` in `parse` method is the original file object (or a `peekable` wrapper around it).
In `parse` method:
```python
def parse(self, fh):
# ...
for line in fh_new:
yield self.parse_line(line.rstrip(), fh_new)
```
Wait, `line.rstrip()` is called before passing `text` to `parse_line`.
However, `_extract_yaml_block` uses `next(fh)`, which gets the *original* line including the newline character (unless `rstrip` was used elsewhere).
Let's look at how `fh` is used in `_extract_yaml_block`. It's the `fh_new` from `parse`.
`fh_new` is either `itertools.chain([first_line], fh)` or `peekable(itertools.chain([first_line], fh))`.
`first_line` was `next(fh)`, which includes the newline.
The lines in `fh` also include newlines.
So `next(fh)` returns a line like `" this is a multiline\n"`.
And `replace(indent, "", 1)` removes the leading indentation, leaving `"this is a multiline\n"`.
Then `raw_yaml.append("this is a multiline\n")` happens.
Finally, `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` results in `"this is a multiline\n\n"`.
That's exactly why we get double newlines.
To fix this, we should remove the trailing newline character from the line before appending it to `raw_yaml`.
But we must be careful: we only want to remove the *trailing* newline, not all trailing whitespace (since YAML might have meaningful trailing whitespace, though usually not). However, since the parser is designed to handle TAP and the `parse` method uses `line.rstrip()`, maybe we should be consistent.
Actually, YAML blocks in TAP 13 should preserve the content of the YAML. If we use `rstrip()`, we might lose trailing spaces which might be important for some YAML values. But usually, it's the trailing newline that is the problem.
The issue reporter says: `_extract_yaml_block() performs "\n".join(raw_yaml) without having stripped the newline character in each possible line`.
So if we change `raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))` to `raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))`, it should fix it.
Wait, if we do `rstrip('\n\r')` first, then `replace(indent, "", 1)` might not work if the indentation was removed from the end? No, indentation is at the beginning.
Wait, `indent` is a string of spaces. `replace(indent, "", 1)` replaces the first occurrence of `indent`. If `indent` is `" "`, and the line is `" this is a multiline\n"`, then `replace` makes it `"this is a multiline\n"`.
If we do:
```python
line = next(fh)
line = line.rstrip('\n\r')
line = line.replace(indent, "", 1)
raw_yaml.append(line)
```
This should work.
Let's check if there are other places where `_extract_yaml_block` is used. It's only used in `_parse_result`.
Is there any other parallel path?
The `Parser` class seems to be the only one doing this.
Wait, I should check if there are any tests for YAML blocks.
`tap/tests/test_parser.py` likely has some.
Let's look at `tap/tests/test_parser.py`.I found `_extract_yaml_block`:
```python
def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):
"""Extract a raw yaml block from a file handler"""
raw_yaml = []
indent_match = re.compile(r"^{}".format(indent))
try:
next(fh)
while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):
raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))
# check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
except StopIteration:
pass
return "\n".join(raw_yaml)
```
The `next(fh)` call inside the `while` loop gets a line from the file handler. The file handler `fh` in `parse` method is the original file object (or a `peekable` wrapper around it).
In `parse` method:
```python
def parse(self, fh):
# ...
for line in fh_new:
yield self.parse_line(line.rstrip(), fh_new)
```
Wait, `line.rstrip()` is called before passing `text` to `parse_line`.
However, `_extract_yaml_block` uses `next(fh)`, which gets the *original* line including the newline character (unless `rstrip` was used elsewhere).
Let's look at how `fh` is used in `_extract_yaml_block`. It's the `fh_new` from `parse`.
`fh_new` is either `itertools.chain([first_line], fh)` or `peekable(itertools.chain([first_line], fh))`.
`first_line` was `next(fh)`, which includes the newline.
The lines in `fh` also include newlines.
So `next(fh)` returns a line like `" this is a multiline\n"`.
And `replace(indent, "", 1)` removes the leading indentation, leaving `"this is a multiline\n"`.
Then `raw_yaml.append("this is a multiline\n")` happens.
Finally, `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` results in `"this is a multiline\n\n"`.
That's exactly why we get double newlines.
To fix this, we should remove the trailing newline character from the line before appending it to `raw_yaml`.
But we must be careful: we only want to remove the *trailing* newline, not all trailing whitespace (since YAML might have meaningful trailing whitespace, though usually not). However, since the parser is designed to handle TAP and the `parse` method uses `line.rstrip()`, maybe we should be consistent.
Actually, YAML blocks in TAP 13 should preserve the content of the YAML. If we use `rstrip()`, we might lose trailing spaces which might be important for some YAML values. But usually, it's the trailing newline that is the problem.
The issue reporter says: `_extract_yaml_block() performs "\n".join(raw_yaml) without having stripped the newline character in each possible line`.
So if we change `raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))` to `raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))`, it should fix it.
Wait, if we do `rstrip('\n\r')` first, then `replace(indent, "", 1)` might not work if the indentation was removed from the end? No, indentation is at the beginning.
Wait, `indent` is a string of spaces. `replace(indent, "", 1)` replaces the first occurrence of `indent`. If `indent` is `" "`, and the line is `" this is a multiline\n"`, then `replace` makes it `"this is a multiline\n"`.
If we do:
```python
line = next(fh)
line = line.rstrip('\n\r')
line = line.replace(indent, "", 1)
raw_yaml.append(line)
```
This should work.
Let's check if there are other places where `_extract_yaml_block` is used. It's only used in `_parse_result`.
Is there any other parallel path?
The `Parser` class seems to be the only one doing this.
Wait, I should check if there are any tests for YAML blocks.
`tap/tests/test_parser.py` likely has some.
Let's look at `tap/tests/test_parser.py`.<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn "yaml" tap/tests/test_parser.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 71 tokens · stopped: STOP
Let's read `tap/tests/test_parser.py` around line 226 for `test_parses_yaml`.
Let's read `tap/tests/test_parser.py` around line 226 for `test_parses_yaml`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{end_line:350,filepath:<|"|>tap/tests/test_parser.py<|"|>,start_line:220}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 69 tokens · stopped: STOP
I want to see the end of `test_parses_yaml_more_complex` to see if it exercises multiline strings.
I want to see the end of `test_parses_yaml_more_complex` to see if it exercises multiline strings.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{end_line:400,filepath:<|"|>tap/tests/test_parser.py<|"|>,start_line:350}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 1,819 tokens · stopped: STOP
The current tests don't seem to have a multiline string example in the YAML block that would specifically fail with this bug (they use lists and simple keys).
Wait, if the YAML block is just:
```yaml
message: test
severity: fail
```
Then `raw_yaml` will be `["message: test\n", "severity: fail\n"]`.
`"\n".join(raw_yaml)` will be `"message: test\n\nseverity: fail\n"`.
`yaml.safe_load` will probably handle those extra newlines fine because YAML ignores empty lines between key-value pairs.
However, when using a block scalar (like `|+` or `|`), the newlines are part of the value.
Example:
```yaml
output: |+
line 1
line 2
```
If `raw_yaml` is `["output: |+\n", " line 1\n", " line 2\n"]`, then `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` is:
`"output: |+\n\n line 1\n\n line 2\n"`
The `yaml` parser will see this as:
`output` is a block scalar.
The first line after `|+` is an empty line (the `\n` from the join).
Then ` line 1`
Then another empty line.
Then ` line 2`
That's exactly what's happening in the reproduction case.
So the fix is indeed to remove the trailing newline from each line before joining them.
I'll use `rstrip('\n\r')` to be safe and maintain parity with how Python's open() handles universal newlines. Actually, Python 3's `open()` by default handles `\n`, `\r\n`, etc., and returns `\n`. So `line.rstrip('\n')` or `line.rstrip('\r\n')` is not quite right if we want to be通用. `line.rstrip('\n\r')` would remove all trailing newlines/carriage returns.
Wait, the `parse` method uses `line.rstrip()`.
```python
def parse(self, fh):
# ...
for line in fh_new:
yield self.parse_line(line.rstrip(), fh_new)
```
`line.rstrip()` removes all trailing whitespace, including `\n` and also spaces/tabs.
In `_extract_yaml_block`, we are extracting the RAW yaml block. If we use `rstrip()`, we might remove trailing spaces that are meant to be in the YAML block.
YAML block scalars (like `|`) preserve trailing whitespace on lines.
According to YAML spec, block scalars preserve everything including trailing spaces on each line.
If I use `line.rstrip('\n\r')`, I only remove the trailing newline characters.
Let's see:
`line = " this is a line \n"`
`line.rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" this is a line "`
`line.rstrip()` -> `" this is a line"`
So `rstrip('\n\r')` is safer for YAML.
Let's implement the fix.
```python
def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):
"""Extract a raw yaml block from a file handler"""
raw_yaml = []
indent_match = re.compile(r"^{}".format(indent))
try:
next(fh)
while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):
raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))
# check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
except StopIteration:
pass
return "\n".join(raw_yaml)
```
Wait, let me check if I should remove the newline BEFORE or AFTER replacing the indent. It doesn't matter as the indent is at the start and newline is at the end.
Wait, `next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1)` is what it was.
If I do `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1)`, I'm removing the newline and then replacing the indent.
One detail: `next(fh)` in the `while` loop is called. If the block is empty, `raw_yaml` is empty. If it's not, it's populated.
Let's double check the reproduction case.
`tap_input` contains:
```python
---
message: test
severity: fail
output: |+
this is a multiline
string but with tap
somehow blank lines
are added to it.
```
Indent is `" "`.
Lines are:
`" message: test\n"`
`" severity: fail\n"`
`" output: |+\n"`
`" this is a multiline\n"`
`" string but with tap\n"`
`" somehow blank lines\n"`
`" are added to it.\n"`
`_extract_yaml_block` is called with `indent=" "`.
1. `next(fh)` skips `---`.
2. `fh.peek()` is `" message: test\n"`. Matches `indent`.
`next(fh)` -> `" message: test\n"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"message: test\n"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test\n"]`.
3. `fh.peek()` is `" severity: fail\n"`. Matches.
`next(fh)` -> `" severity: fail\n"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"severity: fail\n"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test\n", "severity: fail\n"]`.
...
And so on.
Finally `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` gives `"message: test\n\nseverity: fail\n\n... "`.
With my fix:
2. `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" message: test"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"message: test"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test"]`.
3. `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" severity: fail"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"severity: fail"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test", "severity: fail"]`.
...
Finally `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` gives `"message: test\nseverity: fail\n..."`. This is correct.
Wait, there is one thing. `replace(indent, "", 1)` is called on the line.
If the line is `" this is a multiline\n"` and indent is `" "`.
`rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" this is a multiline"`
`replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `" this is a multiline"`
This is correct, it preserves the relative indentation of the YAML content.
One more thing: `self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek())`.
`yaml_block_end = re.compile(r"^\s+\.\.\.")`.
The `...` marks the end of the YAML block.
In `_extract_yaml_block`:
```python
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
```
This consumes the `...` line.
Let's apply the fix.The current tests don't seem to have a multiline string example in the YAML block that would specifically fail with this bug (they use lists and simple keys).
Wait, if the YAML block is just:
```yaml
message: test
severity: fail
```
Then `raw_yaml` will be `["message: test\n", "severity: fail\n"]`.
`"\n".join(raw_yaml)` will be `"message: test\n\nseverity: fail\n"`.
`yaml.safe_load` will probably handle those extra newlines fine because YAML ignores empty lines between key-value pairs.
However, when using a block scalar (like `|+` or `|`), the newlines are part of the value.
Example:
```yaml
output: |+
line 1
line 2
```
If `raw_yaml` is `["output: |+\n", " line 1\n", " line 2\n"]`, then `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` is:
`"output: |+\n\n line 1\n\n line 2\n"`
The `yaml` parser will see this as:
`output` is a block scalar.
The first line after `|+` is an empty line (the `\n` from the join).
Then ` line 1`
Then another empty line.
Then ` line 2`
That's exactly what's happening in the reproduction case.
So the fix is indeed to remove the trailing newline from each line before joining them.
I'll use `rstrip('\n\r')` to be safe and maintain parity with how Python's open() handles universal newlines. Actually, Python 3's `open()` by default handles `\n`, `\r\n`, etc., and returns `\n`. So `line.rstrip('\n')` or `line.rstrip('\r\n')` is not quite right if we want to be通用. `line.rstrip('\n\r')` would remove all trailing newlines/carriage returns.
Wait, the `parse` method uses `line.rstrip()`.
```python
def parse(self, fh):
# ...
for line in fh_new:
yield self.parse_line(line.rstrip(), fh_new)
```
`line.rstrip()` removes all trailing whitespace, including `\n` and also spaces/tabs.
In `_extract_yaml_block`, we are extracting the RAW yaml block. If we use `rstrip()`, we might remove trailing spaces that are meant to be in the YAML block.
YAML block scalars (like `|`) preserve trailing whitespace on lines.
According to YAML spec, block scalars preserve everything including trailing spaces on each line.
If I use `line.rstrip('\n\r')`, I only remove the trailing newline characters.
Let's see:
`line = " this is a line \n"`
`line.rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" this is a line "`
`line.rstrip()` -> `" this is a line"`
So `rstrip('\n\r')` is safer for YAML.
Let's implement the fix.
```python
def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):
"""Extract a raw yaml block from a file handler"""
raw_yaml = []
indent_match = re.compile(r"^{}".format(indent))
try:
next(fh)
while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):
raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))
# check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
except StopIteration:
pass
return "\n".join(raw_yaml)
```
Wait, let me check if I should remove the newline BEFORE or AFTER replacing the indent. It doesn't matter as the indent is at the start and newline is at the end.
Wait, `next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1)` is what it was.
If I do `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1)`, I'm removing the newline and then replacing the indent.
One detail: `next(fh)` in the `while` loop is called. If the block is empty, `raw_yaml` is empty. If it's not, it's populated.
Let's double check the reproduction case.
`tap_input` contains:
```python
---
message: test
severity: fail
output: |+
this is a multiline
string but with tap
somehow blank lines
are added to it.
```
Indent is `" "`.
Lines are:
`" message: test\n"`
`" severity: fail\n"`
`" output: |+\n"`
`" this is a multiline\n"`
`" string but with tap\n"`
`" somehow blank lines\n"`
`" are added to it.\n"`
`_extract_yaml_block` is called with `indent=" "`.
1. `next(fh)` skips `---`.
2. `fh.peek()` is `" message: test\n"`. Matches `indent`.
`next(fh)` -> `" message: test\n"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"message: test\n"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test\n"]`.
3. `fh.peek()` is `" severity: fail\n"`. Matches.
`next(fh)` -> `" severity: fail\n"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"severity: fail\n"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test\n", "severity: fail\n"]`.
...
And so on.
Finally `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` gives `"message: test\n\nseverity: fail\n\n... "`.
With my fix:
2. `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" message: test"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"message: test"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test"]`.
3. `next(fh).rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" severity: fail"`. `replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `"severity: fail"`. `raw_yaml = ["message: test", "severity: fail"]`.
...
Finally `"\n".join(raw_yaml)` gives `"message: test\nseverity: fail\n..."`. This is correct.
Wait, there is one thing. `replace(indent, "", 1)` is called on the line.
If the line is `" this is a multiline\n"` and indent is `" "`.
`rstrip('\n\r')` -> `" this is a multiline"`
`replace(" ", "", 1)` -> `" this is a multiline"`
This is correct, it preserves the relative indentation of the YAML content.
One more thing: `self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek())`.
`yaml_block_end = re.compile(r"^\s+\.\.\.")`.
The `...` marks the end of the YAML block.
In `_extract_yaml_block`:
```python
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
break
```
This consumes the `...` line.
Let's apply the fix.<channel|><|tool_call>call:edit_file{filepath:<|"|>tap/parser.py<|"|>,new_string:<|"|> raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))<|"|>,old_string:<|"|> raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 171 tokens · stopped: STOP
Now let's verify the fix with the reproduction script and the existing tests.
Now let's verify the fix with the reproduction script and the existing tests.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY'
import tap.parser
tap_input = """TAP version 13
1..2
ok 1 A passing test
---
message: test
severity: fail
output: |+
this is a multiline
string but with tap
somehow blank lines
are added to it.
"""
parser = tap.parser.Parser()
for i, l in enumerate(parser.parse_text(tap_input)):
if i == 2:
print("{!r}".format(l.yaml_block["output"].splitlines()))
PY
<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 51 tokens · stopped: STOP
The reproduction case now passes. Now let's run the existing tests.
The reproduction case now passes. Now let's run the existing tests.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>pytest tap/tests/test_parser.py -q --tb=short --no-header<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 87 tokens · stopped: STOP
All tests in `tap/tests/test_parser.py` passed. I should check if any other tests are relevant. `tap/tests/test_result.py` might be relevant since `Result` contains `yaml_block`.
All tests in `tap/tests/test_parser.py` passed.
I should check if any other tests are relevant. `tap/tests/test_result.py` might be relevant since `Result` contains `yaml_block`.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>pytest tap/tests/test_result.py -q --tb=short --no-header<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 38 tokens · stopped: STOP
Everything seems correct. I'll do a final check of the diff.
Everything seems correct. I'll do a final check of the diff.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>git status --short && git diff<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Generated tokens 26 tokens · stopped: STOP
The diff is minimal and correct. I'm ready to submit.
The diff is minimal and correct. I'm ready to submit.
<channel|><|tool_call>call:submit_patch{}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Patch, tests and logs
Final code change Included
diff --git a/tap/parser.py b/tap/parser.py
index 637436b..6523513 100644
--- a/tap/parser.py
+++ b/tap/parser.py
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ WARNING: Optional imports not found, TAP 13 output will be
try:
next(fh)
while indent_match.match(fh.peek()):
- raw_yaml.append(next(fh).replace(indent, "", 1))
+ raw_yaml.append(next(fh).rstrip('\n\r').replace(indent, "", 1))
# check for the end and stop adding yaml if encountered
if self.yaml_block_end.match(fh.peek()):
next(fh)
Test output Included
============================= test session starts ============================== collected 114 items tap/tests/test_adapter.py ..... [ 4%] tap/tests/test_directive.py ...... [ 9%] tap/tests/test_formatter.py .. [ 11%] tap/tests/test_line.py ....... [ 17%] tap/tests/test_loader.py ....... [ 23%] tap/tests/test_main.py ...... [ 28%] tap/tests/test_parser.py ........................... [ 52%] tap/tests/test_result.py ......... [ 60%] tap/tests/test_rules.py ........ [ 67%] tap/tests/test_runner.py ........ [ 74%] tap/tests/test_tracker.py ............................. [100%] ==================================== PASSES ==================================== - generated xml file: /tmp/rebench-grade-f91067fc6ee549a68f10caf68aca36ce.xml -- =========================== short test summary info ============================ PASSED tap/tests/test_adapter.py::TestAdapter::test_adapter_has_filename PASSED tap/tests/test_adapter.py::TestAdapter::test_handles_not_ok_todo_test_line PASSED tap/tests/test_adapter.py::TestAdapter::test_handles_ok_test_line PASSED tap/tests/test_adapter.py::TestAdapter::test_handles_ok_todo_test_line PASSED tap/tests/test_adapter.py::TestAdapter::test_handles_skip_test_line PASSED tap/tests/test_directive.py::TestDirective::test_finds_simplest_skip PASSED tap/tests/test_directive.py::TestDirective::test_finds_simplest_todo PASSED tap/tests/test_directive.py::TestDirective::test_finds_skip PASSED tap/tests/test_directive.py::TestDirective::test_finds_todo PASSED tap/tests/test_directive.py::TestDirective::test_skip_at_beginning PASSED tap/tests/test_directive.py::TestDirective::test_todo_has_boundary PASSED tap/tests/test_formatter.py::TestFormatter::test_format_exception_as_diagnostics PASSED tap/tests/test_formatter.py::TestFormatter::test_formats_as_diagnostics PASSED tap/tests/test_line.py::TestLine::test_line_requires_category PASSED tap/tests/test_line.py::TestResult::test_category PASSED tap/tests/test_line.py::TestResult::test_ok PASSED tap/tests/test_line.py::TestResult::test_str_diagnostics PASSED tap/tests/test_line.py::TestResult::test_str_directive PASSED tap/tests/test_line.py::TestResult::test_str_not_ok PASSED tap/tests/test_line.py::TestResult::test_str_ok PASSED tap/tests/test_loader.py::TestLoader::test_errors_with_multiple_version_lines PASSED tap/tests/test_loader.py::TestLoader::test_errors_with_version_not_on_first_line PASSED tap/tests/test_loader.py::TestLoader::test_file_does_not_exist PASSED tap/tests/test_loader.py::TestLoader::test_handles_directory PASSED tap/tests/test_loader.py::TestLoader::test_handles_file PASSED tap/tests/test_loader.py::TestLoader::test_loads_from_stream PASSED tap/tests/test_loader.py::TestLoader::test_skip_plan_aborts_loading PASSED tap/tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_build_suite_from_stdin PASSED tap/tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_build_suite_from_stdin_dash PASSED tap/tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_exits_with_error PASSED tap/tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_get_successful_status PASSED tap/tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_when_no_pipe_to_stdin PASSED tap/tests/test_main.py::TestMainModule::test_main_set_to_stream PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_after_hash_is_not_description PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_bail_out_line PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_diagnostic_line PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_errors_on_old_version PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_description PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_directive PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_not_ok PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_number PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_ok PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_plan PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_plan_with_skip PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_skip PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_todo PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_finds_version PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_ignores_plan_with_any_non_skip_directive PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_malformed_yaml PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parse_empty_file PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_file PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_mixed PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_stdin PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_text PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_yaml PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_yaml_more_complex PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_yaml_no_association PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_yaml_no_end PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_parses_yaml_no_start PASSED tap/tests/test_parser.py::TestParser::test_unrecognizable_line PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::FakeTestCase::runTest PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_error PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_expected_failure PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_failure PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_skip PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_subtest_failure PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_subtest_success PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_success PASSED tap/tests/test_result.py::TestTAPTestResult::test_adds_unexpected_success PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_errors_on_bail PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_errors_plan_not_at_end PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_errors_when_expected_tests_differs_from_actual PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_handles_skipping_plan PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_only_one_plan PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_plan_line_two PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_requires_plan PASSED tap/tests/test_rules.py::TestRules::test_tracks_plan_line PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_bad_format_string PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_has_tap_test_result PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_runner_sets_tracker_for_streaming PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_runner_stream_to_devnull_for_streaming PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_runner_uses_combined PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_runner_uses_format PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_runner_uses_header PASSED tap/tests/test_runner.py::TestTAPTestRunner::test_runner_uses_outdir PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_add_not_ok_writes_to_stream_while_streaming PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_add_ok_writes_to_stream_while_streaming PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_add_skip_writes_to_stream_while_streaming PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_adds_not_ok PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_adds_not_ok_with_diagnostics PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_adds_ok PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_adds_skip PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_combined_results_in_one_file_tap_version_12 PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_combined_results_in_one_file_tap_version_13 PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_does_not_write_header PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_generates_tap_reports_in_existing_outdir PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_generates_tap_reports_in_new_outdir PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_get_default_tap_file_path PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_has_test_cases PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_header_displayed_by_default PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_header_set_by_init PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_individual_report_has_no_plan_when_combined PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_results_not_combined_by_default PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_sanitizes_tap_file_path PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_streaming_does_not_write_files PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_streaming_writes_plan PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_streaming_writes_tap_version_13 PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_tracker_does_not_stream_by_default PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_tracker_has_stream PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_tracks_class PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_write_plan_first_combined PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_write_plan_first_not_combined PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_write_plan_first_streaming PASSED tap/tests/test_tracker.py::TestTracker::test_write_plan_immediate_streaming ============================= 114 passed in 0.18s ==============================
Test errors Included
Test report (JUnit) Included
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><testsuites><testsuite name="pytest" errors="0" failures="0" skipped="0" tests="114" time="0.180" timestamp="2026-11-14T03:23:54.317143+00:00" hostname="58280458d82b"><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_adapter.TestAdapter" name="test_adapter_has_filename" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_adapter.TestAdapter" name="test_handles_not_ok_todo_test_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_adapter.TestAdapter" name="test_handles_ok_test_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_adapter.TestAdapter" name="test_handles_ok_todo_test_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_adapter.TestAdapter" name="test_handles_skip_test_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_directive.TestDirective" name="test_finds_simplest_skip" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_directive.TestDirective" name="test_finds_simplest_todo" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_directive.TestDirective" name="test_finds_skip" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_directive.TestDirective" name="test_finds_todo" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_directive.TestDirective" name="test_skip_at_beginning" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_directive.TestDirective" name="test_todo_has_boundary" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_formatter.TestFormatter" name="test_format_exception_as_diagnostics" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_formatter.TestFormatter" name="test_formats_as_diagnostics" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_line.TestLine" name="test_line_requires_category" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_line.TestResult" name="test_category" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_line.TestResult" name="test_ok" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_line.TestResult" name="test_str_diagnostics" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_line.TestResult" name="test_str_directive" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_line.TestResult" name="test_str_not_ok" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_line.TestResult" name="test_str_ok" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_loader.TestLoader" name="test_errors_with_multiple_version_lines" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_loader.TestLoader" name="test_errors_with_version_not_on_first_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_loader.TestLoader" name="test_file_does_not_exist" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_loader.TestLoader" name="test_handles_directory" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_loader.TestLoader" name="test_handles_file" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_loader.TestLoader" name="test_loads_from_stream" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_loader.TestLoader" name="test_skip_plan_aborts_loading" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_main.TestMain" name="test_build_suite_from_stdin" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_main.TestMain" name="test_build_suite_from_stdin_dash" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_main.TestMain" name="test_exits_with_error" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_main.TestMain" name="test_get_successful_status" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_main.TestMain" name="test_when_no_pipe_to_stdin" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_main.TestMainModule" name="test_main_set_to_stream" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_after_hash_is_not_description" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_bail_out_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_diagnostic_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_errors_on_old_version" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_description" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_directive" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_not_ok" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_number" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_ok" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_plan" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_plan_with_skip" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_skip" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_todo" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_finds_version" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_ignores_plan_with_any_non_skip_directive" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_malformed_yaml" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parse_empty_file" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_file" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_mixed" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_stdin" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_text" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_yaml" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_yaml_more_complex" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_yaml_no_association" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_yaml_no_end" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_parses_yaml_no_start" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_parser.TestParser" name="test_unrecognizable_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.FakeTestCase" name="runTest" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_error" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_expected_failure" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_failure" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_skip" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_subtest_failure" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_subtest_success" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_success" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_result.TestTAPTestResult" name="test_adds_unexpected_success" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_errors_on_bail" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_errors_plan_not_at_end" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_errors_when_expected_tests_differs_from_actual" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_handles_skipping_plan" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_only_one_plan" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_plan_line_two" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_requires_plan" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_rules.TestRules" name="test_tracks_plan_line" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_bad_format_string" time="0.001" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_has_tap_test_result" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_runner_sets_tracker_for_streaming" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_runner_stream_to_devnull_for_streaming" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_runner_uses_combined" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_runner_uses_format" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_runner_uses_header" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_runner.TestTAPTestRunner" name="test_runner_uses_outdir" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_add_not_ok_writes_to_stream_while_streaming" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_add_ok_writes_to_stream_while_streaming" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_add_skip_writes_to_stream_while_streaming" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_adds_not_ok" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_adds_not_ok_with_diagnostics" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_adds_ok" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_adds_skip" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_combined_results_in_one_file_tap_version_12" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_combined_results_in_one_file_tap_version_13" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_does_not_write_header" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_generates_tap_reports_in_existing_outdir" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_generates_tap_reports_in_new_outdir" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_get_default_tap_file_path" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_has_test_cases" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_header_displayed_by_default" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_header_set_by_init" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_individual_report_has_no_plan_when_combined" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_results_not_combined_by_default" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_sanitizes_tap_file_path" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_streaming_does_not_write_files" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_streaming_writes_plan" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_streaming_writes_tap_version_13" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_tracker_does_not_stream_by_default" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_tracker_has_stream" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_tracks_class" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_write_plan_first_combined" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_write_plan_first_not_combined" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_write_plan_first_streaming" time="0.000" /><testcase classname="tap.tests.test_tracker.TestTracker" name="test_write_plan_immediate_streaming" time="0.000" /></testsuite></testsuites>
Agent log Included
[ 0.0s] 📋 System Prompt: You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`.
[ 0.0s] 🎯 Task Prompt: You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository python-tap/tappy.
[ 17.2s] 💭 (444 chars) "The user is reporting a bug in `tap.parser._extract_yaml_block`.
It seems that `_extract_yaml_block` joins lines using `..."
[ 17.2s] 🔧 run_command (21 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
[ 17.3s] → ['', 'this is a multiline', '', 'string but with tap', '', 'somehow blank lines', '', 'are added to
it.']
[ 22.5s] 💭 (320 chars) "The reproduction confirms the bug. The output is `['', 'this is a multiline', '', 'string
but with tap', '', 'somehow bl..."
[ 22.5s] 📖 read_file (tap/parser.py)
[ 22.5s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'tap/parser.py', 'content': '# Copyright (c) 2019, Matt Layman and
contributors\n\nfrom io …
[ 26.5s] 💭 (113 chars) "I need to read the rest of the `Parser` class in `tap/parser.py`, specifically looking for
`_extract_yaml_block`."
[ 26.5s] 📖 read_file (tap/parser.py`,start_line:151)
[ 26.5s] ❌ {'status': 'error', 'error_type': 'FileReadError', 'error_message': '404 Client Error for
http+docker://localhost/v1.52/…
[ 57.1s] 💭 (1329 chars) "Ah, I made a mistake in the `read_file` call by not providing the `filepath` as a separate
argument. Wait, I did providi..."
[ 57.1s] 📖 read_file (tap/parser.py)
[ 57.1s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'tap/parser.py', 'content': '\n def _parse_result(self, ok, match,
fh=None):\n ""…
[ 122.8s] 💭 (3674 chars) "I found `_extract_yaml_block`:
```python
def _extract_yaml_block(self, indent, fh):
"""Extract a raw yaml b..."
[ 122.8s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn "yaml" tap/tests/test_parser.py
[ 122.8s] → 14: import yaml
[ 126.8s] 💭 (77 chars) "Let's read `tap/tests/test_parser.py` around line 226 for `test_parses_yaml`."
[ 126.8s] 📖 read_file (tap/tests/test_parser.py)
[ 126.8s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'tap/tests/test_parser.py', 'content': ' self.assertEqual("test",
lines[1].category)…
[ 130.9s] 💭 (98 chars) "I want to see the end of `test_parses_yaml_more_complex` to see if it exercises multiline
strings."
[ 130.9s] 📖 read_file (tap/tests/test_parser.py)
[ 130.9s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'tap/tests/test_parser.py', 'content': ' expect:\n
- bar"…
[ 248.0s] 💭 (5513 chars) "The current tests don't seem to have a multiline string example in the YAML block that
would specifically fail with this..."
[ 248.0s] ✏️ edit_file (tap/parser.py)
[ 248.2s] ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'tap/parser.py', 'occurrences': 1, 'strategy': 'exact', 'diff': '---
a/tap/parser.py\n+++ b…
[ 256.8s] 💭 (77 chars) "Now let's verify the fix with the reproduction script and the existing tests."
[ 256.8s] 🔧 run_command (21 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
[ 256.9s] → ['this is a multiline', 'string but with tap', 'somehow blank lines', 'are added to it.']
[ 261.0s] 💭 (67 chars) "The reproduction case now passes. Now let's run the existing tests."
[ 261.0s] 🔧 run_command pytest tap/tests/test_parser.py -q --tb=short --no-header
[ 261.4s] → ........................... [100%]
[ 266.3s] 💭 (179 chars) "All tests in `tap/tests/test_parser.py` passed.
I should check if any other tests are relevant. `tap/tests/test_result...."
[ 266.3s] 🔧 run_command pytest tap/tests/test_result.py -q --tb=short --no-header
[ 266.5s] → ......... [100%]
[ 268.8s] 💭 (60 chars) "Everything seems correct. I'll do a final check of the diff."
[ 268.8s] 🔧 run_command git status --short && git diff
[ 268.8s] → M tap/parser.py
[ 270.4s] 💭 (53 chars) "The diff is minimal and correct. I'm ready to submit."
[ 270.4s] 🤖 submit_patch
[ 270.5s] → submit_patch: {"status": "ok", "patch_size": 586, "files_changed": 1}
[ 284.1s] 💭 (234 chars) "I have reproduced the bug, fixed it, and verified the fix with both the reproduction script
and the test suite. The fix ..."
[ 284.1s] ✅ Agent finished: The bug was caused by `_extract_yaml_block` in `tap/parser.py` joining lines with `"\n"`
without removing the existing trailing newline characters from each line. This resulted in unwanted empty lines...
Native result row
{
"agent_error": null,
"duration_seconds": 289.1,
"error": null,
"grade": {
"collected_tests": 114,
"competition_junit_ok": true,
"error": null,
"required_issues_count": 0,
"resolved": true,
"status_counts": {
"PASSED": 114
},
"strict_clean_patch": true,
"test_exit_code": 0
},
"instance_id": "python-tap__tappy-112",
"pass_idx": 0,
"patch_chars": 586,
"phase1_seconds": 288.07,
"repo": "python-tap/tappy",
"request_log_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/requests/python-tap__tappy-112__p0__r7.jsonl",
"resolved": true,
"rollout_idx": 7,
"run_key": "python-tap__tappy-112__p0__r7",
"strict_clean_patch": true,
"tool_calls": 12,
"total_llm_calls": 14,
"trace_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/traces/trace_python-tap__tappy-112__p0__r7.json"
}