GEMMA DEVELOPER AGENT
SAVED EVIDENCE
← 31B real rollouts · 480 (exact stack, 32 lanes, 13-Nov)
ROLLOUT 6 · caikit/caikit

caikit__caikit-233

Not solved
456 stotal time
9tool calls
9model calls
6,095tokens generated
66,866prompt tokens read

Empty agent patch

Turn by turn

Token shading: p ≥ 0.9 0.5 – 0.9 0.2 – 0.5 below 0.2. Hover a token for its id and probability.

System instructions 4,822 characters
You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`.
Your sole objective is to produce a minimal, root-cause source patch that passes every hidden fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass regression test on the first grading run.

## Critical Environment & Grader Rules
1. **Air-Gapped Sandbox & Available CLI Tools**: No network access. Never run `pip`, `uv`, `conda`, or `git fetch`. Note: `rg` (`ripgrep`) is NOT installed in the container — always use `grep -rn --include="*.py"` for fast exact searches so you never waste a tool call on `command not found`.
2. **Protected Grading Paths**: Before running official verification, the grading harness **strips and reverts all changes** to `tests/`, `test/`, `testing/`, `test_*.py`, `*_test.py`, `conftest.py`, `pyproject.toml`, `setup.cfg`, `pytest.ini`, and `tox.ini`. Every part of your fix MUST reside in non-test production source files.
3. **Untracked File Trap (`git add -N .`)**: `submit_patch` stages ALL untracked files inside `/workspace`! Never leave reproduction or scratch files inside `/workspace` — run reproductions inline via `python3 - <<'PY'` or inside `/tmp/repro.py` in a single `run_command`.
4. **Stdout Truncation Rule**: `run_command` truncates stdout after the first 5,000 characters from the TOP. Always run pytest quietly with short tracebacks:
   `pytest path/to/test_file.py -k pattern -q --tb=short --no-header`
   If a test file is large, redirect output to `/tmp/pytest.log` and inspect `tail -n 80 /tmp/pytest.log` so failure tracebacks at the bottom are never cut off.
5. **Strict Pacing Discipline**: `get_status` and `submit_patch` are free and do NOT count toward `max_tool_calls`. Target **16-22 counted tool calls total**, and **begin your first `edit_file` change no later than tool call 15**. Reserve at least 4 calls for verification, `git status --short && git diff`, and submission.

## Execution Protocol

### Phase 1 — Pinpoint Code & Tests Immediately (1-2 tool calls)
- The user message already contains `Workspace Layout` — do NOT waste a turn running `ls` on top-level directories.
- Run a single compound `run_command` with `grep -rn --include="*.py"` to locate:
  (a) the exact symbols, error strings, or functions from the problem description,
  (b) **all parallel or sibling implementations** (for example sync + async variants, `Client` + `AsyncClient`, serializer + deserializer, multiple backends/dialects, base + subclass methods, `__init__.py` / `__all__` exports), and
  (c) the closest existing unit test files under `tests/`.

### Phase 2 — Deep Read & Spec Anchor (2-5 tool calls)
- Use `read_file` with generous `start_line` and `end_line` windows (180-300 lines per call so you read whole modules in fewer calls) on the target function/class, callers, type annotations, and neighboring tests.
- Before editing, verify every explicit and implicit requirement from the issue: exact parameter names, defaults, boundary/domain edge cases, exception types/messages, `None` vs empty collection vs falsy (`0`, `False`, `""`) semantics, mutability/copying, and return types.

### Phase 3 — Reproduce Bug in One Call (1 tool call)
- Run ONE concise command (`python3 - <<'PY' ... PY` or targeted `pytest ... -q --tb=short --no-header`) via `run_command` to observe the exact pre-fix failure. Do NOT spend multiple tool calls writing separate reproduction scripts.

### Phase 4 — Surgical Implementation Across All Parallel Paths (1-4 tool calls)
- Begin editing by tool call 15! Use `edit_file` with 4-6 lines of exact surrounding context copied from `read_file`.
- Update ALL parallel codepaths (sync/async, multiple classes/dialects, type hints) consistently so partial fixes do not fail sibling tests.
- **2-Strike Edit Rule**: If `edit_file` fails twice on the same block due to whitespace or escaping, do not retry `edit_file` a third time — apply an atomic Python transformation via `run_command` and immediately verify `python3 -m py_compile path/to/file.py`.

### Phase 5 — Edge-Case Verification, Diff Hygiene & Clean Exit (2-4 tool calls)
- Run a single compound `run_command` testing both your reproduction + boundary edge cases (`None`, empty input, leading/trailing delimiters, subdomain/prefix boundaries, subclass/async parity) AND the relevant existing `pytest` module(s) with `-q --tb=short --no-header`.
- Run `git status --short && git diff` via `run_command`. Confirm:
  - ZERO untracked (`??`) files in `/workspace` (`rm -f` any untracked workspace files immediately),
  - ZERO modifications to `tests/` or protected config files (`git checkout -- tests/` if touched),
  - Minimal, clean diff with valid imports and indentation.
- Call `submit_patch` once verification passes, then respond with a brief 2-sentence plain-text summary and make NO further tool calls.
Task prompt 4,175 characters
You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository caikit/caikit.

Problem Statement:
Support Functional Inheritance
## Describe the bug

When creating a `class` that inherits from a `DataObjectBase` and overrides parent functions without adding or changing any of the schema, an exception is raised:

```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
  File "/Users/ghart/Projects/github/caikit/caikit2/caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py", line 88, in __new__
    raise TypeError(
TypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax
```

## Sample Code

```py
from caikit.core import DataObjectBase, dataobject

@dataobject
class Base(DataObjectBase):
    foo: int
    def doit(self):
        return self.foo * 2

@dataobject
class Derived(Base):
    def doit(self):
        return self.foo * 3
```

## Expected behavior

```py
b_inst = Base(1)
assert b_inst.doit() == 2

d_inst = Derived(1)
assert d_inst.doit() == 3
```

## Observed behavior

```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
  File "/Users/ghart/Projects/github/caikit/caikit2/caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py", line 88, in __new__
    raise TypeError(
TypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax
```

## Additional context

This will be very important for allowing content libraries to share common data structures with custom backend, construction, and functional interfaces


## Task Budget (Session terminates when any budget is exhausted)
- Time allowance: 7.5 minutes
- Tool calls allowance: 30 calls
- Max loop iterations: 40 turns

## Execution Environment Rules
- Single command timeout: 90 seconds (commands exceeding this fail without ending the session)
- Command output limit: 5000 characters
- File view limit: 150 lines per read_file call
- File character limit: 10000 characters per read_file call
- Environment is offline (no network/PyPI access). All repository and test dependencies are ALREADY pre-installed. Do NOT attempt to run pip install or download packages.

## Instructions:
0. All source code is under `/workspace`. Do NOT search outside `/workspace` (e.g. `/usr/`, `/wheels/`, system site-packages). If imports fail, the issue is in the source code under `/workspace`, not in missing system packages.
1. Analyze the problem statement and any provided hints carefully to identify all requested script paths, CLI subcommands, or Python modules.
2. Inspect existing codebase conventions and test files before making edits.
3. Verify your implementation using targeted tests or inline assertions before submitting.
4. Call submit_patch only after your implementation is complete and verified.
5. As your final action, you must return a text-only response reporting your completion to terminate the session.
## Workspace Layout
The repository is located at `/workspace`. Here is the directory tree (up to 3 levels):
```
./CODEOWNERS
./CONTRIBUTING.md
./LICENSE
./README.md
./SECURITY.md
./caikit
./caikit-overview.png
./caikit/__init__.py
./caikit/config
./caikit/config/__init__.py
./caikit/config/config.py
./caikit/config/config.yml
./caikit/core
./caikit/core/__init__.py
./caikit/core/augmentors
./caikit/core/data_model
./caikit/core/model_manager.py
./caikit/core/module_backends
./caikit/core/modules
./caikit/core/registries.py
./caikit/core/signature_parsing
./caikit/core/task.py
./caikit/core/toolkit
./caikit/interfaces
./caikit/interfaces/__init__.py
./caikit/interfaces/common
./caikit/interfaces/runtime
./caikit/runtime
./caikit/runtime/__init__.py
./caikit/runtime/dump_services.py
./caikit/runtime/grpc_server.py
./caikit/runtime/interceptors
./caikit/runtime/metrics
./caikit/runtime/model_management
./caikit/runtime/protobufs
./caikit/runtime/service_factory.py
./caikit/runtime/service_generation
./caikit/runtime/servicers
./caikit/runtime/types
./caikit/runtime/utils
./caikit/runtime/work_management
./code-of-conduct.md
./docs
./docs-requirements.txt
./examples
./pyproject.toml
./releases.md
./scripts
./scripts/check_deps.sh
./scripts/fmt.sh
./setup_requirements.txt
./tests
./tox.ini
```
Turn 1at 27 s442 tokens out3,251 prompt tokens
The user is reporting a bug where inheriting from a `DataObjectBase` class and overriding methods without adding new schema fields causes a `TypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax`.

The sample code provided is:
```python
from caikit.core import DataObjectBase, dataobject

@dataobject
class Base(DataObjectBase):
    foo: int
    def doit(self):
        return self.foo * 2

@dataobject
class Derived(Base):
    def doit(self):
        return self.foo * 3
```

This should result in:
```python
b_inst = Base(1)
assert b_inst.doit() == 2

d_inst = Derived(1)
assert d_inst.doit() == 3
```

But it fails with:
`TypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax` at `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py`, line 88, in `__new__`.

I need to investigate `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py` to understand why this is happening and how to fix it.

First, I'll reproduce the bug.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom caikit.core import DataObjectBase, dataobject\n\n@dataobject\nclass Base(DataObjectBase):\n    foo: int\n    def doit(self):\n        return self.foo * 2\n\n@dataobject\nclass Derived(Base):\n    def doit(self):\n        return self.foo * 3\n\nb_inst = Base(foo=1)\nprint(f\"Base doit: {b_inst.doit()}\")\nassert b_inst.doit() == 2\n\nd_inst = Derived(foo=1)\nprint(f\"Derived doit: {d_inst.doit()}\")\nassert d_inst.doit() == 3\nPY\n"
}
Result of run_command 829 characters
{
  "status": "error",
  "error_type": "CommandError",
  "error_message": "<function register_backend_type at 0x74b67656e200> is still in the BETA phase and subject to change!\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"<stdin>\", line 10, in <module>\n  File \"/workspace/caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py\", line 88, in __new__\n    raise TypeError(\nTypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax\n",
  "details": {
    "stdout": "",
    "stderr": "<function register_backend_type at 0x74b67656e200> is still in the BETA phase and subject to change!\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"<stdin>\", line 10, in <module>\n  File \"/workspace/caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py\", line 88, in __new__\n    raise TypeError(\nTypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax\n",
    "exit_code": 1
  }
}
Generated tokens 442 tokens · stopped: STOP
<|channel>thought The user is reporting a bug where inheriting from a `DataObjectBase` class and overriding methods without adding new schema fields causes a `TypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax`. The sample code provided is: ```python from caikit.core import DataObjectBase, dataobject @dataobject class Base(DataObjectBase): foo: int def doit(self): return self.foo * 2 @dataobject class Derived(Base): def doit(self): return self.foo * 3 ``` This should result in: ```python b_inst = Base(1) assert b_inst.doit() == 2 d_inst = Derived(1) assert d_inst.doit() == 3 ``` But it fails with: `TypeError: All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax` at `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py`, line 88, in `__new__`. I need to investigate `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py` to understand why this is happening and how to fix it. First, I'll reproduce the bug.<channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY' from caikit.core import DataObjectBase, dataobject @dataobject class Base(DataObjectBase): foo: int def doit(self): return self.foo * 2 @dataobject class Derived(Base): def doit(self): return self.foo * 3 b_inst = Base(foo=1) print(f"Base doit: {b_inst.doit()}") assert b_inst.doit() == 2 d_inst = Derived(foo=1) print(f"Derived doit: {d_inst.doit()}") assert d_inst.doit() == 3 PY <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 2at 32 s78 tokens out3,973 prompt tokens
The reproduction worked and confirmed the bug.
Now let's examine `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py` around line 88.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "end_line": 120,
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py",
  "start_line": 50
}
Result of read_file 3,029 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py",
  "content": "    JsonDict: struct_pb2.Struct,\n    np.int32: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_INT32,\n    np.int64: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_INT64,\n    np.uint32: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_UINT32,\n    np.uint64: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_UINT64,\n    np.float32: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_FLOAT,\n    np.float64: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_DOUBLE,\n    **PY_TO_PROTO_TYPES,\n}\n\n# Common package prefix\nCAIKIT_DATA_MODEL = \"caikit_data_model\"\n\n# Registry of auto-generated protos so that they can be rendered to .proto\n_AUTO_GEN_PROTO_CLASSES = []\n\n# Special attribute used to indicate which defaults are user provided\n_USER_DEFINED_DEFAULTS = \"__user_defined_defaults__\"\n\n## Public ######################################################################\n\n\nclass _DataObjectBaseMetaClass(_DataBaseMetaClass):\n    \"\"\"This metaclass is used for the DataObject base class so that all data\n    objects can delay the creation of their proto class until after the\n    metaclass has been instantiated.\n    \"\"\"\n\n    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):\n        \"\"\"When instantiating a new DataObject class, the proto class will not\n        yet have been generated, but the set of fields will be known since the\n        class will be the raw input representation of a @dataclass\n        \"\"\"\n\n        # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass\n        if name != \"DataObjectBase\":\n            field_names = attrs.get(\"__annotations__\")\n            if field_names is None:\n                raise TypeError(\n                    \"All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax\"\n                )\n            attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names\n\n        # Delegate to the base metaclass\n        return super().__new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs)\n\n\nclass DataObjectBase(DataBase, metaclass=_DataObjectBaseMetaClass):\n    \"\"\"A DataObject is a data model class that is backed by a @dataclass.\n\n    Data model classes that use the @dataobject decorator must derive from this\n    base class.\n    \"\"\"\n\n\ndef dataobject(*args, **kwargs) -> Callable[[Type], Type[DataBase]]:\n    \"\"\"The @dataobject decorator can be used to define a Data Model object's\n    schema inline with the definition of the python class rather than needing to\n    bind to a pre-compiled protobufs class. For example:\n\n    @dataobject(\"foo.bar\")\n    @dataclass\n    class MyDataObject(DataObjectBase):\n        '''My Custom Data Object'''\n        foo: str\n        bar: int\n\n    NOTE: The wrapped class must NOT inherit directly from DataBase. That\n        inheritance will be added by this decorator, but if it is written\n        directly, the metaclass that links protobufs to the class will be called\n        before this decorator can auto-gen the protobufs class.",
  "start_line": 50,
  "end_line": 120,
  "total_lines": 386,
  "is_truncated": false
}
Generated tokens 78 tokens · stopped: STOP
The reproduction worked and confirmed the bug. Now let's examine `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py` around line 88.<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py<|"|>,start_line:50,end_line:120}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 3at 78 s599 tokens out4,900 prompt tokens
The issue is in `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__`:

```python
    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):
        """When instantiating a new DataObject class, the proto class will not
        yet have been generated, the set of fields will be known since the
        class will be the raw input representation of a @dataclass
        """

        # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass
        if name != "DataObjectBase":
            field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__")
            if field_names is None:
                raise TypeError(
                    "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax"
                )
            attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names

        # Delegate to the base metaclass
        return super().__new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs)
```

When a class inherits from another `DataObjectBase` class, it might not have its own `__annotations__` if no new fields are added. In Python, `attrs` only contains the attributes defined in the class being created, not those inherited from parent classes.

If `Derived` inherits from `Base` and `Base` has `foo: int`, `Derived.__annotations__` will be empty or non-existent if no new annotations are added in `Derived`.

According to Python's data model, `__annotations__` is not inherited.

To fix this, we should check if any of the base classes have `__annotations__` or if the current class has them. However, we probably want to collect all annotations from the inheritance chain to determine the full schema of the `DataObject`.

Wait, if `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and both are `@dataobject`, the `Base` class already went through `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` and had `attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names` set.

But `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` is a metaclass. When `Derived` is created, its `attrs` doesn't include the `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from `Base` because it's an attribute of the class, not something that is automatically merged into the `attrs` of the subclass by the metaclass unless explicitly handled.

Wait, `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` is set on the class.

Let's see what `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` is. I should find its definition in `_DataBaseMetaClass`.
The `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` inherits from `_DataBaseMetaClass`.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "grep -rn \"_FWD_DECL_FIELDS\" caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py"
}
Result of run_command 133 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "stdout": "91:            attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names\n",
  "stderr": "",
  "exit_code": 0
}
Generated tokens 599 tokens · stopped: STOP
The issue is in `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__`: ```python def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs): """When instantiating a new DataObject class, the proto class will not yet have been generated, the set of fields will be known since the class will be the raw input representation of a @dataclass """ # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass if name != "DataObjectBase": field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__") if field_names is None: raise TypeError( "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax" ) attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names # Delegate to the base metaclass return super().__new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs) ``` When a class inherits from another `DataObjectBase` class, it might not have its own `__annotations__` if no new fields are added. In Python, `attrs` only contains the attributes defined in the class being created, not those inherited from parent classes. If `Derived` inherits from `Base` and `Base` has `foo: int`, `Derived.__annotations__` will be empty or non-existent if no new annotations are added in `Derived`. According to Python's data model, `__annotations__` is not inherited. To fix this, we should check if any of the base classes have `__annotations__` or if the current class has them. However, we probably want to collect all annotations from the inheritance chain to determine the full schema of the `DataObject`. Wait, if `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and both are `@dataobject`, the `Base` class already went through `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` and had `attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names` set. But `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` is a metaclass. When `Derived` is created, its `attrs` doesn't include the `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from `Base` because it's an attribute of the class, not something that is automatically merged into the `attrs` of the subclass by the metaclass unless explicitly handled. Wait, `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` is set on the class. Let's see what `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` is. I should find its definition in `_DataBaseMetaClass`. The `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` inherits from `_DataBaseMetaClass`. <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn "_FWD_DECL_FIELDS" caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 4at 83 s83 tokens out5,560 prompt tokens
It seems `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` is defined in `_DataBaseMetaClass`. Let me find where `_DataBaseMetaClass` is defined. It's likely in the same file or imported.
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "grep -rn \"class _DataBaseMetaClass\" caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py"
}
Result of run_command 127 characters
{
  "status": "error",
  "error_type": "CommandError",
  "error_message": "",
  "details": {
    "stdout": "",
    "stderr": "",
    "exit_code": 1
  }
}
Generated tokens 83 tokens · stopped: STOP
It seems `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` is defined in `_DataBaseMetaClass`. Let me find where `_DataBaseMetaClass` is defined. It's likely in the same file or imported. <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>grep -rn "class _DataBaseMetaClass" caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 5at 87 s69 tokens out5,698 prompt tokens
Wait, I didn't see it in the `read_file` output. Let me read the beginning of the file.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "end_line": 100,
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py",
  "start_line": 1
}
Result of read_file 3,927 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py",
  "content": "# Copyright The Caikit Authors\n#\n# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the \"License\");\n# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.\n# You may obtain a copy of the License at\n#\n#     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0\n#\n# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software\n# distributed under the License is distributed on an \"AS IS\" BASIS,\n# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.\n# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and\n# limitations under the License.\n\n\"\"\"This module defines the @schema decorator which can be used to declare data\nmodel objects inline without manually defining the protobufs representation\n\"\"\"\n\n\n# Standard\nfrom enum import Enum\nfrom typing import Any, Callable, List, Type, Union, get_args, get_origin\nimport dataclasses\n\n# Third Party\nfrom google.protobuf import descriptor as _descriptor\nfrom google.protobuf import message as _message\nfrom google.protobuf import struct_pb2\nfrom google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper import EnumTypeWrapper\nimport numpy as np\n\n# First Party\nfrom py_to_proto.dataclass_to_proto import PY_TO_PROTO_TYPES, DataclassConverter\nimport alog\nimport py_to_proto\n\n# Local\nfrom ..toolkit.errors import error_handler\nfrom . import enums\nfrom .base import DataBase, _DataBaseMetaClass\nfrom .json_dict import JsonDict\n\n## Globals #####################################################################\n\nlog = alog.use_channel(\"SCHEMA\")\nerror = error_handler.get(log)\n\n# Type mapping for type hints in @dataobject classes\nDATAOBJECT_PY_TO_PROTO_TYPES = {\n    JsonDict: struct_pb2.Struct,\n    np.int32: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_INT32,\n    np.int64: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_INT64,\n    np.uint32: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_UINT32,\n    np.uint64: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_UINT64,\n    np.float32: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_FLOAT,\n    np.float64: _descriptor.FieldDescriptor.TYPE_DOUBLE,\n    **PY_TO_PROTO_TYPES,\n}\n\n# Common package prefix\nCAIKIT_DATA_MODEL = \"caikit_data_model\"\n\n# Registry of auto-generated protos so that they can be rendered to .proto\n_AUTO_GEN_PROTO_CLASSES = []\n\n# Special attribute used to indicate which defaults are user provided\n_USER_DEFINED_DEFAULTS = \"__user_defined_defaults__\"\n\n## Public ######################################################################\n\n\nclass _DataObjectBaseMetaClass(_DataBaseMetaClass):\n    \"\"\"This metaclass is used for the DataObject base class so that all data\n    objects can delay the creation of their proto class until after the\n    metaclass has been instantiated.\n    \"\"\"\n\n    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):\n        \"\"\"When instantiating a new DataObject class, the proto class will not\n        yet have been generated, but the set of fields will be known since the\n        class will be the raw input representation of a @dataclass\n        \"\"\"\n\n        # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass\n        if name != \"DataObjectBase\":\n            field_names = attrs.get(\"__annotations__\")\n            if field_names is None:\n                raise TypeError(\n                    \"All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax\"\n                )\n            attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names\n\n        # Delegate to the base metaclass\n        return super().__new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs)\n\n\nclass DataObjectBase(DataBase, metaclass=_DataObjectBaseMetaClass):\n    \"\"\"A DataObject is a data model class that is backed by a @dataclass.\n\n    Data model classes that use the @dataobject decorator must derive from this",
  "start_line": 1,
  "end_line": 100,
  "total_lines": 386,
  "is_truncated": false
}
Generated tokens 69 tokens · stopped: STOP
Wait, I didn't see it in the `read_file` output. Let me read the beginning of the file. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{end_line:100,filepath:<|"|>caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py<|"|>,start_line:1}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 6at 91 s68 tokens out6,864 prompt tokens
It is imported from `.base`:
`from .base import DataBase, _DataBaseMetaClass`

Let's find `caikit/core/data_model/base.py`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/base.py"
}
Result of read_file 6,238 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/base.py",
  "content": "# Copyright The Caikit Authors\n#\n# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the \"License\");\n# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.\n# You may obtain a copy of the License at\n#\n#     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0\n#\n# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software\n# distributed under the License is distributed on an \"AS IS\" BASIS,\n# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.\n# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and\n# limitations under the License.\n\n\n\"\"\"Base classes and functionality for all data structures.\n\"\"\"\n\n# metaclass-generated field members cannot be detected by pylint\n# pylint: disable=no-member\n\n# Standard\nfrom dataclasses import dataclass\nfrom enum import Enum\nfrom typing import Any, Dict, Optional, Type, Union\nimport base64\nimport json\n\n# Third Party\nfrom google.protobuf import json_format\nfrom google.protobuf.descriptor import Descriptor\nfrom google.protobuf.internal import type_checkers as proto_type_checkers\nfrom google.protobuf.message import Message as ProtoMessageType\n\n# First Party\nimport alog\n\n# Local\nfrom ..toolkit.errors import error_handler\nfrom . import enums, json_dict\n\nlog = alog.use_channel(\"DATAM\")\nerror = error_handler.get(log)\n\n\nclass _DataBaseMetaClass(type):\n    \"\"\"Meta class for all structures in the data model.\"\"\"\n\n    # store a registry of all classes that use this metaclass, i.e.,\n    # all classes that extend DataBase. This is used for constructing new\n    # instances by name without having to introspect all modules in data_model.\n    class_registry = {}\n\n    # This sentinel value is used to determine whether a given attribute is\n    # present on a class without doing `getattr` twice in the case where the\n    # attribute does exist.\n    _MISSING_ATTRIBUTE = \"missing attribute\"\n\n    # Special attribute used to communicate that the proto fields are forward\n    # declared and will be populated after the metaclass has completed\n    # construction.\n    _FWD_DECL_FIELDS = \"__fwd_decl_fields__\"\n\n    # Special instance attributes that an instance of a class derived from\n    # DataBase may have. These are added to __slots__.\n    _BACKEND_ATTR = \"_backend\"\n    _WHICH_ONEOF_ATTR = \"_which_oneof\"\n\n    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):\n        \"\"\"When constructing a new data model class, we set the 'fields' class variable from the\n        protobufs descriptor and then set the '__slots__' magic class attribute to fields.  This\n        provides two benefits: (a) performance is improved since the classes only need to know\n        about these attributes (b) it helps to enforce that all member variables in these classes\n        are described in the protobufs.\n\n        Note:  If you want to add a variable for internal use that is not described in the\n        protobufs, it can be named in the tuple class variable _private_slots and will\n        automatically be added to __slots__.\n        \"\"\"\n\n        # Protobufs fields can be divided into these categories, which are used\n        # to automatically determine appropriate behavior in a number of methods\n        attrs[\"full_name\"] = name\n        attrs[\"fields_enum_map\"] = {}\n        attrs[\"fields_enum_rev\"] = {}\n        attrs[\"_fields_oneofs_map\"] = {}\n        attrs[\"_fields_to_oneof\"] = {}\n        attrs[\"_fields_map\"] = ()\n        attrs[\"_fields_message\"] = ()\n        attrs[\"_fields_message_repeated\"] = ()\n        attrs[\"_fields_enum\"] = ()\n        attrs[\"_fields_enum_repeated\"] = ()\n        attrs[\"_fields_primitive\"] = ()\n        attrs[\"_fields_primitive_repeated\"] = ()\n\n        # Look for the set of fields either from a predefined protobuf class or\n        # from a forward declaration from @dataobject\n        fields = ()\n        proto_class = None\n        if name not in [\"DataBase\", \"DataObjectBase\"]:\n            # Look for a precompiled proto class and if found, parse its\n            # descriptor\n            proto_class = attrs.get(\"_proto_class\")\n            if proto_class is not None:\n                all_oneof_fields = [\n                    field.name\n                    for oneof in proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.oneofs\n                    for field in oneof.fields\n                ]\n                fields = tuple(\n                    (\n                        field\n                        for field in proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields_by_name\n                        if field not in all_oneof_fields\n                    )\n                ) + tuple(proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.oneofs_by_name)\n\n            # Otherwise, we need to get the fields from a \"special\" attribute\n            else:\n                fields = attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None)\n                log.debug4(\n                    \"Using dataclass forward declaration fields %s for %s\", fields, name\n                )\n                error.value_check(\n                    \"<COR49310991E>\",\n                    fields is not None,\n                    \"No proto class found for {}\",\n                    name,\n                )\n        attrs[\"fields\"] = fields\n        attrs[\"_proto_class\"] = proto_class\n\n        # Look if any private slots are declared as class variables\n        private_slots = attrs.setdefault(\"_private_slots\", ())\n\n        # Class slots are fields + private slots, this prevents other\n        # member attributes from being set and also improves performance\n        attrs[\"__slots__\"] = tuple(\n            [f\"_{field}\" for field in fields]\n            + list(private_slots)\n            + [mcs._BACKEND_ATTR, mcs._WHICH_ONEOF_ATTR]\n        )\n\n        # Create the instance of the type\n        instance = super().__new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs)\n\n        # If there's a valid proto class, perform proto descriptor parsing\n        if proto_class is not None:\n            mcs.parse_proto_descriptor(instance)\n",
  "start_line": 1,
  "end_line": 150,
  "total_lines": 990,
  "is_truncated": true
}
Generated tokens 68 tokens · stopped: STOP
It is imported from `.base`: `from .base import DataBase, _DataBaseMetaClass` Let's find `caikit/core/data_model/base.py`. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>caikit/core/data_model/base.py<|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 7at 352 s4,190 tokens out8,564 prompt tokens
In `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` (which is the base class for `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass`):

```python
        # Look for the set of fields either from a predefined protobuf class or
        # from a forward declaration from @dataobject
        fields = ()
        proto_class = None
        if name not in ["DataBase", "DataObjectBase"]:
            # Look for a precompiled proto class and if found, parse its
            # descriptor
            proto_class = attrs.get("_proto_class")
            if proto_class is not None:
                # ... (parsing proto class) ...
            # Otherwise, we need to get the fields from a "special" attribute
            else:
                fields = attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None)
                log.debug4(
                    "Using dataclass forward declaration fields %s for %s", fields, name
                )
                error.value_check(
                    "<COR49310991E>",
                    fields is not None,
                    "No proto class found for {}",
                    name,
                )
        attrs["fields"] = fields
```

And `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` does:

```python
    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):
        # ...
        # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass
        if name != "DataObjectBase":
            field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__")
            if field_names is None:
                raise TypeError(
                    "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax"
                )
            attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names

        # Delegate to the base metaclass
        return super().__new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs)
```

If `Derived` inherits from `Base` and has no `__annotations__` in its own definition, `attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `None`. This triggers the `TypeError`.

We should allow `Derived` to not have `__annotations__` if one of its base classes is a `DataObjectBase` (or more generally, if it inherits from something that should provide the schema).

However, `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` is specifically designed for `DataObjectBase` and its subclasses.

If `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and `Base` is a `DataObjectBase`, then `Derived` should be able to inherit the schema from `Base`.

But wait, if `Derived` doesn't have `__annotations__`, it means it's not adding any new fields. The fields should come from `Base`.

The problem is that `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` requires `__annotations__` to be present in `attrs`.

We should change this check to:
1. If `__annotations__` is present in `attrs`, use it.
2. If not, check if any of the `bases` have `__annotations__` or if any of the `bases` are `DataObjectBase` subclasses.

Actually, if the class is a subclass of `Base`, it should inherit `Base`'s fields.

If we look at how `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` handles fields:
```python
            # Otherwise, we need to get the fields from a "special" attribute
            else:
                fields = attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None)
```
It pops `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from `attrs`.

If `Derived` doesn't have `__annotations__`, we should probably copy `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from the base class to `Derived`'s `attrs` so that `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` can find it.

Wait, `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` uses `attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None)`, but `attrs` is the attributes of the class being created. It does NOT include attributes of the base classes.

If `Derived` is created, `attrs` only has things defined in `Derived`.

If `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and we want `Derived` to have the same fields as `Base`, then `Derived`'s `fields` attribute should be the same as `Base`'s.

In `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__`:
```python
        attrs["fields"] = fields
```
This sets the `fields` attribute on the newly created class.

If `fields` was `None` (because `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` wasn't in `attrs`), it throws an error:
```python
                error.value_check(
                    "<COR49310991E>",
                    fields is not None,
                    "No proto class found for {}",
                    name,
                )
```

So the fix should be in `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__`. It should check if `__annotations__` is present. If not, it should check if any of the `bases` have `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` or are `DataObjectBase` subclasses and should inherit those fields.

Wait, if we are talking about `dataclasses`, normally inheritance of annotations is handled by `dataclasses.dataclass`. But here we are implementing a custom mechanism.

If `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and `Base` is a `DataObjectBase`, then `Derived` is also a `DataObjectBase`.

If `Derived` defines no new fields, `Derived.__annotations__` is empty.

If we want `Derived` to have the same fields as `Base`, we should pass `Base`'s `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` to `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__`.

Let's see how to get `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from bases.

```python
    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):
        if name != "DataObjectBase":
            field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__")
            if field_names is None:
                # Check if any base class has _FWD_DECL_FIELDS
                for base in bases:
                    if hasattr(base, _DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS):
                        field_names = getattr(base, _DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS)
                        break
                
                if field_names is None:
                    raise TypeError(
                        "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax"
                    )
            attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names
```

Is this correct? If `Derived` has its own annotations, it should probably merge them with `Base`'s annotations.

The problem statement says "overrides parent functions without adding or changing any of the schema". In this case, `field_names` should be the same as `Base`'s.

If `Derived` *did* add fields:
```python
@dataobject
class Derived(Base):
    new_field: int
    def doit(self):
        ...
```
Then `Derived.__annotations__` would be `{'new_field': int}`.
But `Base` had `{'foo': int}`.
The resulting `Derived` should have both `foo` and `new_field`.

So the `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` should probably merge annotations from all bases.

Let's see how `dataclasses` handles this. `dataclasses` collects all fields from the current class and all base classes.

If we want to support this, we should collect all annotations from the inheritance chain.

```python
    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):
        if name != "DataObjectBase":
            # Collect all annotations from bases and the current class
            all_field_names = {}
            for base in bases:
                # Get annotations from base class (if it's a DataObjectBase)
                # Note: bases might not be DataObjectBase subclasses, so use getattr
                base_ann = getattr(base, "__annotations__", {})
                all_field_names.update(base_ann)
            
            # Current class annotations
            current_ann = attrs.get("__annotations__", {})
            all_field_names.update(current_ann)
            
            if not all_field_names:
                # If no annotations were found anywhere in the chain, 
                # and it's not DataObjectBase, is it still an error?
                # The original code raised TypeError if attrs.get("__annotations__") was None.
                # In Python 3, if no annotations are present, __annotations__ might be missing.
                
                # Wait, the original code:
                # field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__")
                # if field_names is None: raise TypeError(...)
                
                # If I use `all_field_names = {}` and check `if not all_field_names`, 
                # it will fail for classes with no fields. Is that allowed?
                # DataObjectBase probably expects at least one field?
                # Or maybe just the *presence* of the syntax.
                
                # If the class inherits from a DataObjectBase that has fields, 
                # then all_field_names will not be empty.
                
                # But what if it's the root DataObjectBase subclass?
                # If it has no fields and no base DataObjectBase, it should fail.
                
                # Let's check if it's a subclass of anything that is a DataObjectBase
                is_data_object_subclass = any(
                    isinstance(base, _DataObjectBaseMetaClass) or 
                    (hasattr(base, "__mro__") and any(
                        # This is getting complicated. 
                        # We can check if DataObjectBase is in the class's bases (including indirect)
                        False for b in getattr(base, "__mro__", ()) if b is DataObjectBase
                    )) 
                    for base in bases
                )
                # Simpler check: is DataObjectBase in the mro?
                # But we are in __new__, the class is not yet created.
                # We can check if any of the bases is DataObjectBase or a subclass.
```

Wait, a simpler way to check if it's a subclass of `DataObjectBase` is:
`any(issubclass(base, DataObjectBase) for base in bases if isinstance(base, type))`

But `DataObjectBase` is the class we are currently defining. Wait, `DataObjectBase` is already defined.

Let's refine the logic:

1. Collect all annotations from the bases and the current class.
2. If no annotations are found, check if any base is a `DataObjectBase` (or subclass).
3. If it is a `DataObjectBase` subclass, then it's okay that it has no *new* annotations (it inherits them).
4. If it's NOT a `DataObjectBase` subclass (e.g., it's the first class inheriting from `DataObjectBase`) and it has no annotations, then it's a `TypeError`.

Actually, if it's the first class inheriting from `DataObjectBase`, it still must have annotations.

Example 1:
```python
class Base(DataObjectBase): # First level
    foo: int # Has annotations. OK.
```
`all_field_names` = `{'foo': int}`. OK.

Example 2:
```python
class Derived(Base): # Second level
    def doit(self): ... # No annotations.
```
`all_field_names` = `{'foo': int}` (from Base). OK.

Example 3:
```python
class Bad(DataObjectBase): # First level
    def doit(self): ... # No annotations.
```
`all_field_names` = `{}`. Base is `DataObjectBase`.
If we just check `if not all_field_names`, it fails. This is correct according to the original behavior.

Wait, if it's `Bad(DataObjectBase)`, then `all_field_names` is empty. The original code would have `attrs.get("__annotations__")` as `None` (or `{}`).

Wait, if I define:
```python
class Bad(DataObjectBase):
    def doit(self): pass
```
`attrs` will not contain `__annotations__`. `attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `None`. `TypeError` raised. Correct.

If I define:
```python
class Bad(DataObjectBase):
    __annotations__ = {}
    def doit(self): pass
```
`attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `{}`. `field_names` is `{}`. No `TypeError` raised. `attrs[_FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = {}`.

So the original code allows empty annotations if they are explicitly provided.

My proposed logic:
```python
    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):
        if name != "DataObjectBase":
            # Collect annotations from current class and all base classes
            # We use a dict to keep only the latest annotation for each field (override)
            field_names = {}
            for base in bases:
                # Use getattr to avoid issues with classes that don't have __annotations__
                # We only care about annotations from DataObjectBase subclasses.
                # But we can just take all annotations.
                base_ann = getattr(base, "__annotations__", {})
                if base_ann:
                    field_names.update(base_ann)
            
            current_ann = attrs.get("__annotations__", {})
            if current_ann:
                field_names.update(current_ann)
            
            # If no annotations were found anywhere, and the class is not just
            # inheriting from a DataObjectBase with fields, we should error.
            # Actually, if no annotations were found anywhere, then field_names is {}.
            
            # Let's see. The original code:
            # field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__")
            # if field_names is None:
            #     raise TypeError(...)
            
            # If Derived(Base) has no annotations, attrs.get("__annotations__") is None.
            # If we want to allow this, we should check if any base has annotations.
            
            if not field_names:
                # No annotations found in current class OR any base class.
                # Is this always an error?
                # If it's the root DataObjectBase subclass, it must have annotations.
                # If it's a subclass of a DataObjectBase subclass, and that base had no annotations,
                # it's still an error.
                
                # But wait, if the user did `class Derived(Base): pass` and `Base` had fields,
                # then `field_names` would be non-empty.
                
                # So if `field_names` is empty, it means no one in the chain had annotations.
                # One exception: if the current class has `__annotations__ = {}`, 
                # the original code would NOT have raised TypeError.
                
                # If the current class has `__annotations__ = {}`, `attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `{}` (not None).
                # In my proposed logic, `field_names` would be `{}`.
                
                # To maintain exact behavior:
                if attrs.get("__annotations__") is None and not any(getattr(base, "__annotations__", None) for base in bases):
                    raise TypeError(
                        "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax"
                    )
                
                # If we reach here, it means either:
                # 1. attrs has `__annotations__ = {}`
                # 2. some base had `__annotations__ = {}`
                # 3. some base had `__annotations__` and it was empty.
                
                # Wait, if `field_names` is empty, then `attrs[_FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = {}`.
```

Actually, the original code's `field_names` is the `__annotations__` dict.
`attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names`
Then `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` does:
`fields = attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None)`
And then:
`error.value_check("<COR49310991E>", fields is not None, "No proto class found for {}", name)`

So if `field_names` was `{}`, then `fields` is `{}`, which is not `None`, so no `value_check` error.

So the only place that raises `TypeError` is the `if field_names is None` check.

If I change it to:
```python
        # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass
        if name != "DataObjectBase":
            field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__")
            if field_names is None:
                # Inherit annotations from bases if available
                for base in bases:
                    base_ann = getattr(base, "__annotations__", None)
                    if base_ann is not None:
                        field_names = base_ann
                        break
                
                if field_names is None:
                    raise TypeError(
                        "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax"
                    )
            
            # If we have annotations, we should probably merge them if we want
            # to support adding new fields.
            # But the bug report only mentions functional inheritance without changing schema.
            
            # If the user adds new fields, `field_names` will be the current class's annotations.
            # But those annotations will NOT include the base class annotations.
            # This means the `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` will only see the new fields.
            # This is probably NOT what's intended for a @dataobject.
            # A @dataobject should probably behave like a dataclass, where fields are inherited.
```

Wait, if `DataObjectBase` is meant to be used with `@dataobject`, then it should probably support field inheritance.

If I have:
```python
@dataobject
class Base(DataObjectBase):
    foo: int

@dataobject
class Derived(Base):
TOOL CALL · run_command
{
  "command": "python3 - <<'PY'\nfrom caikit.core import DataObjectBase, dataobject\n\n@dataobject\nclass Base(DataObjectBase):\n    foo: int\n\n@dataobject\nclass Derived(Base):\n    bar: int\n\nd = Derived(foo=1, bar=2)\nprint(f\"Derived fields: {d.__dict__}\")\nPY\n"
}
Result of run_command 663 characters
{
  "status": "error",
  "error_type": "CommandError",
  "error_message": "<function register_backend_type at 0x7db314255240> is still in the BETA phase and subject to change!\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"<stdin>\", line 12, in <module>\nAttributeError: 'Derived' object has no attribute '__dict__'. Did you mean: '__dir__'?\n",
  "details": {
    "stdout": "",
    "stderr": "<function register_backend_type at 0x7db314255240> is still in the BETA phase and subject to change!\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"<stdin>\", line 12, in <module>\nAttributeError: 'Derived' object has no attribute '__dict__'. Did you mean: '__dir__'?\n",
    "exit_code": 1
  }
}
Generated tokens 4,190 tokens · stopped: STOP
In `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` (which is the base class for `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass`): ```python # Look for the set of fields either from a predefined protobuf class or # from a forward declaration from @dataobject fields = () proto_class = None if name not in ["DataBase", "DataObjectBase"]: # Look for a precompiled proto class and if found, parse its # descriptor proto_class = attrs.get("_proto_class") if proto_class is not None: # ... (parsing proto class) ... # Otherwise, we need to get the fields from a "special" attribute else: fields = attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None) log.debug4( "Using dataclass forward declaration fields %s for %s", fields, name ) error.value_check( "<COR49310991E>", fields is not None, "No proto class found for {}", name, ) attrs["fields"] = fields ``` And `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` does: ```python def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs): # ... # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass if name != "DataObjectBase": field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__") if field_names is None: raise TypeError( "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax" ) attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names # Delegate to the base metaclass return super().__new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs) ``` If `Derived` inherits from `Base` and has no `__annotations__` in its own definition, `attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `None`. This triggers the `TypeError`. We should allow `Derived` to not have `__annotations__` if one of its base classes is a `DataObjectBase` (or more generally, if it inherits from something that should provide the schema). However, `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` is specifically designed for `DataObjectBase` and its subclasses. If `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and `Base` is a `DataObjectBase`, then `Derived` should be able to inherit the schema from `Base`. But wait, if `Derived` doesn't have `__annotations__`, it means it's not adding any new fields. The fields should come from `Base`. The problem is that `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` requires `__annotations__` to be present in `attrs`. We should change this check to: 1. If `__annotations__` is present in `attrs`, use it. 2. If not, check if any of the `bases` have `__annotations__` or if any of the `bases` are `DataObjectBase` subclasses. Actually, if the class is a subclass of `Base`, it should inherit `Base`'s fields. If we look at how `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` handles fields: ```python # Otherwise, we need to get the fields from a "special" attribute else: fields = attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None) ``` It pops `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from `attrs`. If `Derived` doesn't have `__annotations__`, we should probably copy `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from the base class to `Derived`'s `attrs` so that `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` can find it. Wait, `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` uses `attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None)`, but `attrs` is the attributes of the class being created. It does NOT include attributes of the base classes. If `Derived` is created, `attrs` only has things defined in `Derived`. If `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and we want `Derived` to have the same fields as `Base`, then `Derived`'s `fields` attribute should be the same as `Base`'s. In `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__`: ```python attrs["fields"] = fields ``` This sets the `fields` attribute on the newly created class. If `fields` was `None` (because `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` wasn't in `attrs`), it throws an error: ```python error.value_check( "<COR49310991E>", fields is not None, "No proto class found for {}", name, ) ``` So the fix should be in `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__`. It should check if `__annotations__` is present. If not, it should check if any of the `bases` have `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` or are `DataObjectBase` subclasses and should inherit those fields. Wait, if we are talking about `dataclasses`, normally inheritance of annotations is handled by `dataclasses.dataclass`. But here we are implementing a custom mechanism. If `Derived` inherits from `Base`, and `Base` is a `DataObjectBase`, then `Derived` is also a `DataObjectBase`. If `Derived` defines no new fields, `Derived.__annotations__` is empty. If we want `Derived` to have the same fields as `Base`, we should pass `Base`'s `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` to `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__`. Let's see how to get `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` from bases. ```python def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs): if name != "DataObjectBase": field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__") if field_names is None: # Check if any base class has _FWD_DECL_FIELDS for base in bases: if hasattr(base, _DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS): field_names = getattr(base, _DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS) break if field_names is None: raise TypeError( "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax" ) attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names ``` Is this correct? If `Derived` has its own annotations, it should probably merge them with `Base`'s annotations. The problem statement says "overrides parent functions without adding or changing any of the schema". In this case, `field_names` should be the same as `Base`'s. If `Derived` *did* add fields: ```python @dataobject class Derived(Base): new_field: int def doit(self): ... ``` Then `Derived.__annotations__` would be `{'new_field': int}`. But `Base` had `{'foo': int}`. The resulting `Derived` should have both `foo` and `new_field`. So the `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass` should probably merge annotations from all bases. Let's see how `dataclasses` handles this. `dataclasses` collects all fields from the current class and all base classes. If we want to support this, we should collect all annotations from the inheritance chain. ```python def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs): if name != "DataObjectBase": # Collect all annotations from bases and the current class all_field_names = {} for base in bases: # Get annotations from base class (if it's a DataObjectBase) # Note: bases might not be DataObjectBase subclasses, so use getattr base_ann = getattr(base, "__annotations__", {}) all_field_names.update(base_ann) # Current class annotations current_ann = attrs.get("__annotations__", {}) all_field_names.update(current_ann) if not all_field_names: # If no annotations were found anywhere in the chain, # and it's not DataObjectBase, is it still an error? # The original code raised TypeError if attrs.get("__annotations__") was None. # In Python 3, if no annotations are present, __annotations__ might be missing. # Wait, the original code: # field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__") # if field_names is None: raise TypeError(...) # If I use `all_field_names = {}` and check `if not all_field_names`, # it will fail for classes with no fields. Is that allowed? # DataObjectBase probably expects at least one field? # Or maybe just the *presence* of the syntax. # If the class inherits from a DataObjectBase that has fields, # then all_field_names will not be empty. # But what if it's the root DataObjectBase subclass? # If it has no fields and no base DataObjectBase, it should fail. # Let's check if it's a subclass of anything that is a DataObjectBase is_data_object_subclass = any( isinstance(base, _DataObjectBaseMetaClass) or (hasattr(base, "__mro__") and any( # This is getting complicated. # We can check if DataObjectBase is in the class's bases (including indirect) False for b in getattr(base, "__mro__", ()) if b is DataObjectBase )) for base in bases ) # Simpler check: is DataObjectBase in the mro? # But we are in __new__, the class is not yet created. # We can check if any of the bases is DataObjectBase or a subclass. ``` Wait, a simpler way to check if it's a subclass of `DataObjectBase` is: `any(issubclass(base, DataObjectBase) for base in bases if isinstance(base, type))` But `DataObjectBase` is the class we are currently defining. Wait, `DataObjectBase` is already defined. Let's refine the logic: 1. Collect all annotations from the bases and the current class. 2. If no annotations are found, check if any base is a `DataObjectBase` (or subclass). 3. If it is a `DataObjectBase` subclass, then it's okay that it has no *new* annotations (it inherits them). 4. If it's NOT a `DataObjectBase` subclass (e.g., it's the first class inheriting from `DataObjectBase`) and it has no annotations, then it's a `TypeError`. Actually, if it's the first class inheriting from `DataObjectBase`, it still must have annotations. Example 1: ```python class Base(DataObjectBase): # First level foo: int # Has annotations. OK. ``` `all_field_names` = `{'foo': int}`. OK. Example 2: ```python class Derived(Base): # Second level def doit(self): ... # No annotations. ``` `all_field_names` = `{'foo': int}` (from Base). OK. Example 3: ```python class Bad(DataObjectBase): # First level def doit(self): ... # No annotations. ``` `all_field_names` = `{}`. Base is `DataObjectBase`. If we just check `if not all_field_names`, it fails. This is correct according to the original behavior. Wait, if it's `Bad(DataObjectBase)`, then `all_field_names` is empty. The original code would have `attrs.get("__annotations__")` as `None` (or `{}`). Wait, if I define: ```python class Bad(DataObjectBase): def doit(self): pass ``` `attrs` will not contain `__annotations__`. `attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `None`. `TypeError` raised. Correct. If I define: ```python class Bad(DataObjectBase): __annotations__ = {} def doit(self): pass ``` `attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `{}`. `field_names` is `{}`. No `TypeError` raised. `attrs[_FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = {}`. So the original code allows empty annotations if they are explicitly provided. My proposed logic: ```python def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs): if name != "DataObjectBase": # Collect annotations from current class and all base classes # We use a dict to keep only the latest annotation for each field (override) field_names = {} for base in bases: # Use getattr to avoid issues with classes that don't have __annotations__ # We only care about annotations from DataObjectBase subclasses. # But we can just take all annotations. base_ann = getattr(base, "__annotations__", {}) if base_ann: field_names.update(base_ann) current_ann = attrs.get("__annotations__", {}) if current_ann: field_names.update(current_ann) # If no annotations were found anywhere, and the class is not just # inheriting from a DataObjectBase with fields, we should error. # Actually, if no annotations were found anywhere, then field_names is {}. # Let's see. The original code: # field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__") # if field_names is None: # raise TypeError(...) # If Derived(Base) has no annotations, attrs.get("__annotations__") is None. # If we want to allow this, we should check if any base has annotations. if not field_names: # No annotations found in current class OR any base class. # Is this always an error? # If it's the root DataObjectBase subclass, it must have annotations. # If it's a subclass of a DataObjectBase subclass, and that base had no annotations, # it's still an error. # But wait, if the user did `class Derived(Base): pass` and `Base` had fields, # then `field_names` would be non-empty. # So if `field_names` is empty, it means no one in the chain had annotations. # One exception: if the current class has `__annotations__ = {}`, # the original code would NOT have raised TypeError. # If the current class has `__annotations__ = {}`, `attrs.get("__annotations__")` is `{}` (not None). # In my proposed logic, `field_names` would be `{}`. # To maintain exact behavior: if attrs.get("__annotations__") is None and not any(getattr(base, "__annotations__", None) for base in bases): raise TypeError( "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax" ) # If we reach here, it means either: # 1. attrs has `__annotations__ = {}` # 2. some base had `__annotations__ = {}` # 3. some base had `__annotations__` and it was empty. # Wait, if `field_names` is empty, then `attrs[_FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = {}`. ``` Actually, the original code's `field_names` is the `__annotations__` dict. `attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names` Then `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` does: `fields = attrs.pop(mcs._FWD_DECL_FIELDS, None)` And then: `error.value_check("<COR49310991E>", fields is not None, "No proto class found for {}", name)` So if `field_names` was `{}`, then `fields` is `{}`, which is not `None`, so no `value_check` error. So the only place that raises `TypeError` is the `if field_names is None` check. If I change it to: ```python # Get the annotations that will go into the dataclass if name != "DataObjectBase": field_names = attrs.get("__annotations__") if field_names is None: # Inherit annotations from bases if available for base in bases: base_ann = getattr(base, "__annotations__", None) if base_ann is not None: field_names = base_ann break if field_names is None: raise TypeError( "All DataObjectBase classes must follow dataclass syntax" ) # If we have annotations, we should probably merge them if we want # to support adding new fields. # But the bug report only mentions functional inheritance without changing schema. # If the user adds new fields, `field_names` will be the current class's annotations. # But those annotations will NOT include the base class annotations. # This means the `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` will only see the new fields. # This is probably NOT what's intended for a @dataobject. # A @dataobject should probably behave like a dataclass, where fields are inherited. ``` Wait, if `DataObjectBase` is meant to be used with `@dataobject`, then it should probably support field inheritance. If I have: ```python @dataobject class Base(DataObjectBase): foo: int @dataobject class Derived(Base): <channel|><|tool_call>call:run_command{command:<|"|>python3 - <<'PY' from caikit.core import DataObjectBase, dataobject @dataobject class Base(DataObjectBase): foo: int @dataobject class Derived(Base): bar: int d = Derived(foo=1, bar=2) print(f"Derived fields: {d.__dict__}") PY <|"|>}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 8at 376 s360 tokens out12,980 prompt tokens
The `AttributeError: 'Derived' object has no attribute '__dict__'` is because `_DataBaseMetaClass` sets `__slots__`.

```python
        # Class slots are fields + private slots, this prevents other
        # member attributes from being set and also improves performance
        attrs["__slots__"] = tuple(
            [f"_{field}" for field in fields]
            + list(private_slots)
            + [mcs._BACKEND_ATTR, mcs._WHICH_ONEOF_ATTR]
        )
```

Wait, it sets slots for `_field` (with an underscore).

Let's see `Derived` again. If `Derived` has `bar: int` and `Base` has `foo: int`, then `Derived` should have slots for `_foo` and `_bar`.

If my proposed fix for `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` only takes `attrs.get("__annotations__")`, then `Derived`'s `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` will only be `{'bar': int}`.
Then `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` will set `Derived`'s slots to `('_bar', '_backend', '_which_oneof')`.
Then `Derived(foo=1, bar=2)` will fail because `_foo` is not in slots!

Wait, how does `DataObjectBase` initialize itself? I should check `DataObjectBase.__init__` or its base class `DataBase.__init__`.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/base.py",
  "start_line": 151
}
Result of read_file 6,304 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/base.py",
  "content": "        # Return the constructed class instance\n        return instance\n\n    @classmethod\n    def parse_proto_descriptor(mcs, cls):\n        \"\"\"Encapsulate the logic for parsing the protobuf descriptor here. This\n        allows the parsing to be done as a post-process after metaclass\n        initialization\n        \"\"\"\n\n        # use the fully qualified protobuf name to avoid conflicts with\n        # nested messages that have matching names\n        cls.full_name = cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.full_name\n\n        # preserve old fields for _make_property_getter later\n        old_fields = cls.fields\n\n        # overwrite to only have proto-specific fields present\n        cls.fields = tuple(cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields_by_name)\n\n        # map from all enum fields to their enum classes\n        # note: enums are also primitives, these overlap\n        cls.fields_enum_map = {\n            field.name: getattr(enums, field.enum_type.name)\n            for field in cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields\n            if field.enum_type is not None\n        }\n\n        cls.fields_enum_rev = {\n            field.name: getattr(enums, field.enum_type.name + \"Rev\")\n            for field in cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields\n            if field.enum_type is not None\n        }\n\n        # mapping of all oneofs and the fields that are part of them\n        # NOTE: protobuf makes an interesting use of oneof to wrap types that\n        #   should be explicitly optional. We don't want to consider these\n        #   oneofs in the general oneof handling.\n        cls._fields_oneofs_map = {\n            oneof_name: [field.name for field in oneof.fields]\n            for oneof_name, oneof in cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.oneofs_by_name.items()\n            if len(oneof.fields) != 1 or oneof.name != f\"_{oneof.fields[0].name}\"\n        }\n        cls._fields_to_oneof = {\n            field_name: oneof_name\n            for (oneof_name, oneof_fields) in cls._fields_oneofs_map.items()\n            for field_name in oneof_fields\n        }\n\n        # all repeated fields\n        fields_repeated = tuple(\n            field.name\n            for field in cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields\n            if field.label == field.LABEL_REPEATED\n        )\n\n        # all messages, repeated or not\n        _fields_message_all = tuple(\n            field.name\n            for field in cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields\n            if field.type == field.TYPE_MESSAGE\n        )\n\n        # all enums, repeated or not\n        _fields_enum_all = tuple(\n            field.name\n            for field in cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields\n            if field.enum_type is not None\n        )\n\n        # all fields of type map\n        cls._fields_map = tuple(\n            field.name\n            for field in cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields\n            if field.message_type and field.message_type.GetOptions().map_entry\n        )\n\n        # all primitives, repeated or not\n        _fields_primitive_all = (\n            frozenset(cls.fields)\n            .difference(cls._fields_map)\n            .difference(_fields_message_all)\n            .difference(_fields_enum_all)\n        )\n\n        # messages that are not repeated\n        cls._fields_message = frozenset(_fields_message_all).difference(fields_repeated)\n\n        # messages that are repeated\n        cls._fields_message_repeated = frozenset(fields_repeated).intersection(\n            _fields_message_all\n        )\n\n        # enums that are not repeated\n        cls._fields_enum = frozenset(_fields_enum_all).difference(fields_repeated)\n\n        # enums that are repeated\n        cls._fields_enum_repeated = frozenset(_fields_enum_all).intersection(\n            fields_repeated\n        )\n\n        # primitives that are not repeated\n        cls._fields_primitive = frozenset(_fields_primitive_all).difference(\n            fields_repeated\n        )\n\n        # primitives that are repeated\n        cls._fields_primitive_repeated = frozenset(fields_repeated).intersection(\n            _fields_primitive_all\n        )\n\n        # Update the global class and proto registries\n        # NOTE: Explicitly not respecting metaclass inheritance so single\n        #   registry shared for all\n        _DataBaseMetaClass.class_registry[cls.full_name] = cls\n\n        # Add properties that use the underlying backend. Also add fields that\n        # existed in old_fields for supporting oneofs\n        # see https://github.com/caikit/caikit/pull/107 for details\n        for field in set(cls.fields + tuple(old_fields)):\n            # If the field is the name of a field within a oneof and it was not\n            # in the old fields, the data is held under the oneof's name if this\n            # is the set value for the oneof\n            if oneof_name := cls._fields_to_oneof.get(field):\n                setattr(cls, field, mcs._make_property_getter(field, oneof_name))\n\n            # If the field is a plain field or the name of a oneof, it will be\n            # accessed directly\n            else:\n                setattr(cls, field, mcs._make_property_getter(field))\n\n        # If there is not already an __init__ function defined, make one\n        current_init = cls.__init__\n        if current_init is None or current_init is DataBase.__init__:\n            setattr(cls, \"__init__\", mcs._make_init(cls.fields))\n\n    @classmethod\n    def _make_property_getter(mcs, field, oneof_name=None):\n        \"\"\"This helper creates an @property attribute getter for the given field\n\n        NOTE: This needs to live as a standalone function in order for the given\n            field name to be properly bound to the closure for the attrs\n        \"\"\"\n        private_name = f\"_{field}\" if oneof_name is None else oneof_name\n\n        def _property_getter(self):\n            # Check to see if the private name is defined and just return it if\n            # it is\n            current = getattr(self, private_name, mcs._MISSING_ATTRIBUTE)\n            if current is not mcs._MISSING_ATTRIBUTE:",
  "start_line": 151,
  "end_line": 300,
  "total_lines": 990,
  "is_truncated": true
}
Generated tokens 360 tokens · stopped: STOP
The `AttributeError: 'Derived' object has no attribute '__dict__'` is because `_DataBaseMetaClass` sets `__slots__`. ```python # Class slots are fields + private slots, this prevents other # member attributes from being set and also improves performance attrs["__slots__"] = tuple( [f"_{field}" for field in fields] + list(private_slots) + [mcs._BACKEND_ATTR, mcs._WHICH_ONEOF_ATTR] ) ``` Wait, it sets slots for `_field` (with an underscore). Let's see `Derived` again. If `Derived` has `bar: int` and `Base` has `foo: int`, then `Derived` should have slots for `_foo` and `_bar`. If my proposed fix for `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__` only takes `attrs.get("__annotations__")`, then `Derived`'s `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` will only be `{'bar': int}`. Then `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` will set `Derived`'s slots to `('_bar', '_backend', '_which_oneof')`. Then `Derived(foo=1, bar=2)` will fail because `_foo` is not in slots! Wait, how does `DataObjectBase` initialize itself? I should check `DataObjectBase.__init__` or its base class `DataBase.__init__`.<channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>caikit/core/data_model/base.py<|"|>,start_line:151}<tool_call|><|tool_response>
Turn 9at 391 s206 tokens out15,076 prompt tokens
`_DataBaseMetaClass.parse_proto_descriptor` does `cls.fields = tuple(cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields_by_name)`.
And it uses `cls.fields` to create slots and property getters.

However, for `@dataobject` classes, the `_proto_class` is generated from `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS`.
If `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` only contains the fields of the current class, the generated proto will only have those fields.

I need to see how the proto is generated. It's likely in `py_to_proto` or `caikit.core.data_model.dataobject`.

Let's check `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py` further down.
TOOL CALL · read_file
{
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py",
  "start_line": 121
}
Result of read_file 6,374 characters
{
  "status": "ok",
  "filepath": "caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py",
  "content": "\n    Args:\n        package:  str\n            The package name to use for the generated protobufs class\n\n    Returns:\n        decorator:  Callable[[Type], Type[DataBase]]\n            The decorator function that will wrap the given class\n    \"\"\"\n\n    def decorator(cls: Type) -> Type[DataBase]:\n        # Make sure that the wrapped class does NOT inherit from DataBase\n        error.value_check(\n            \"<COR95184230E>\",\n            issubclass(cls, (DataObjectBase, Enum)),\n            \"{} must inherit from DataObjectBase/Enum when using @dataobject\",\n            cls.__name__,\n        )\n\n        # Add the package to the kwargs\n        kwargs.setdefault(\"package\", package)\n\n        # If it's not an enum, fill in any missing field defaults as None\n        # and make sure it's a dataclass\n        if not issubclass(cls, Enum):\n            log.debug2(\"Wrapping data class %s\", cls)\n            user_defined_defaults = {}\n            for annotation in getattr(cls, \"__annotations__\", {}):\n                user_defined_default = getattr(cls, annotation, dataclasses.MISSING)\n                if user_defined_default == dataclasses.MISSING:\n                    log.debug3(\"Filling in None default for %s.%s\", cls, annotation)\n                    setattr(cls, annotation, None)\n                else:\n                    user_defined_defaults[annotation] = user_defined_default\n            # If the current __init__ is auto-generated by dataclass, remove\n            # it so that a new one is created with the new defaults\n            if _has_dataclass_init(cls):\n                log.debug3(\"Resetting default dataclass init\")\n                delattr(cls, \"__init__\")\n            cls = dataclasses.dataclass(cls)\n            setattr(cls, _USER_DEFINED_DEFAULTS, user_defined_defaults)\n\n        descriptor = _dataobject_to_proto(dataclass_=cls, **kwargs)\n\n        # Create the message class from the dataclass\n        proto_class = py_to_proto.descriptor_to_message_class(descriptor)\n        _AUTO_GEN_PROTO_CLASSES.append(proto_class)\n\n        # Add enums to the global enums module\n        for enum_class in _get_all_enums(proto_class):\n            log.debug2(\"Importing enum [%s]\", enum_class.DESCRIPTOR.name)\n            enums.import_enum(enum_class)\n\n        # Declare the merged class that binds DataBase to the wrapped class with\n        # this generated proto class\n        if isinstance(proto_class, type):\n            setattr(cls, \"_proto_class\", proto_class)\n            cls = _make_data_model_class(proto_class, cls)\n\n            # If this was a default-generated dataclass __init__ and there are\n            # any oneofs, we need to augment the __init__ to support kwargs for\n            # the individual fields\n            if _has_dataclass_init(cls) and cls._fields_oneofs_map:\n                setattr(cls, \"__init__\", _make_oneof_init(cls))\n\n        else:\n            enums.import_enum(proto_class, cls)\n            setattr(cls, \"_proto_enum\", proto_class)\n\n        # Return the decorated class\n        return cls\n\n    # If called without the function invocation, fill in the default argument\n    if args and callable(args[0]):\n        assert not kwargs, \"This shouldn't happen!\"\n        package = CAIKIT_DATA_MODEL\n        return decorator(args[0])\n\n    # Pull the package as an arg or a keyword arg\n    if args:\n        package = args[0]\n        if \"package\" in kwargs:\n            raise TypeError(\"Got multiple values for argument 'package'\")\n    else:\n        package = kwargs.get(\"package\", CAIKIT_DATA_MODEL)\n    return decorator\n\n\ndef render_dataobject_protos(interfaces_dir: str):\n    \"\"\"Write out protobufs files for all proto classes generated from dataobjects\n    to the target interfaces directory\n\n    Args:\n        interfaces_dir:  str\n            The target directory (must already exist)\n    \"\"\"\n    for proto_class in _AUTO_GEN_PROTO_CLASSES:\n        proto_class.write_proto_file(interfaces_dir)\n\n\n## Implementation Details ######################################################\n\n\ndef _dataobject_to_proto(*args, **kwargs):\n    kwargs.setdefault(\"type_mapping\", DATAOBJECT_PY_TO_PROTO_TYPES)\n    return _DataobjectConverter(*args, **kwargs).descriptor\n\n\nclass _DataobjectConverter(DataclassConverter):\n    \"\"\"Augment the dataclass converter to be able to pull descriptors from\n    existing data objects\n    \"\"\"\n\n    def get_concrete_type(self, entry: Any) -> Any:\n        \"\"\"Also include data model classes and enums as concrete types\"\"\"\n        unwrapped = self._resolve_wrapped_type(entry)\n        if (\n            isinstance(unwrapped, type)\n            and issubclass(unwrapped, DataBase)\n            and unwrapped._proto_class is not None\n        ) or hasattr(unwrapped, \"_proto_enum\"):\n            return entry\n        return super().get_concrete_type(entry)\n\n    def get_descriptor(self, entry: Any) -> Any:\n        \"\"\"Unpack data model classes and enums to their descriptors\"\"\"\n        entry = self._resolve_wrapped_type(entry)\n        if isinstance(entry, type) and issubclass(entry, DataBase):\n            return entry._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR\n        proto_enum = getattr(entry, \"_proto_enum\", None)\n        if proto_enum is not None:\n            return proto_enum.DESCRIPTOR\n        return super().get_descriptor(entry)\n\n    def get_optional_field_names(self, entry: Any) -> List[str]:\n        \"\"\"Get the names of any fields which are optional. This will be any\n        field that has a user-defined default or is marked as Optional[]\n        \"\"\"\n        optional_fields = list(getattr(entry, _USER_DEFINED_DEFAULTS, {}))\n        for field_name, field in entry.__dataclass_fields__.items():\n            if (\n                field_name not in optional_fields\n                and self._is_python_optional(field.type) is not None\n            ):\n                optional_fields.append(field_name)\n        return optional_fields\n\n    @staticmethod\n    def _is_python_optional(entry: Any) -> Any:\n        \"\"\"Detect if this type is a python optional\"\"\"",
  "start_line": 121,
  "end_line": 270,
  "total_lines": 386,
  "is_truncated": true
}
Generated tokens 206 tokens · stopped: STOP
`_DataBaseMetaClass.parse_proto_descriptor` does `cls.fields = tuple(cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields_by_name)`. And it uses `cls.fields` to create slots and property getters. However, for `@dataobject` classes, the `_proto_class` is generated from `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS`. If `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` only contains the fields of the current class, the generated proto will only have those fields. I need to see how the proto is generated. It's likely in `py_to_proto` or `caikit.core.data_model.dataobject`. Let's check `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py` further down. <channel|><|tool_call>call:read_file{filepath:<|"|>caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py<|"|>,start_line:121}<tool_call|><|tool_response>

Patch, tests and logs

Final code change Included
Test output Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Test errors Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Test report (JUnit) Missing
Not saved for this rollout. Nothing has been inferred or reconstructed.
Agent log Included
  [   0.0s] 📋 System Prompt: You are a principal Python software engineer resolving a repository issue in `/workspace`.
  [   0.0s] 🎯 Task Prompt: You are evaluating a software engineering task for repository caikit/caikit.
  [  23.2s] 💭 (920 chars) "The user is reporting a bug where inheriting from a `DataObjectBase` class and overriding 
methods without adding new sch..."
  [  23.2s] 🔧 run_command (22 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
  [  23.8s]   → error (exit 0): 
  [  28.6s] 💭 (119 chars) "The reproduction worked and confirmed the bug.
Now let's examine `caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py` around line 88."
  [  28.6s] 📖 read_file (caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py)
  [  28.7s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py', 'content': '    JsonDict: 
struct_pb2.Struct,\n    n…
  [  73.8s] 💭 (2284 chars) "The issue is in `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass.__new__`:

```python
    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, attrs):
        """When..."
  [  73.8s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn "_FWD_DECL_FIELDS" caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py
  [  73.9s]   → 91:            attrs[_DataBaseMetaClass._FWD_DECL_FIELDS] = field_names
  [  79.3s] 💭 (156 chars) "It seems `_FWD_DECL_FIELDS` is defined in `_DataBaseMetaClass`. Let me find where 
`_DataBaseMetaClass` is defined. It's ..."
  [  79.3s] 🔧 run_command grep -rn "class _DataBaseMetaClass" caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py
  [  79.4s]   → error (exit 0): 
  [  83.2s] 💭 (87 chars) "Wait, I didn't see it in the `read_file` output. Let me read the beginning of the file."
  [  83.2s] 📖 read_file (caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py)
  [  83.2s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py', 'content': '# Copyright The Caikit 
Authors\n#\n# Li…
  [  86.8s] 💭 (123 chars) "It is imported from `.base`:
`from .base import DataBase, _DataBaseMetaClass`

Let's find `caikit/core/data_model/base.p..."
  [  86.8s] 📖 read_file (caikit/core/data_model/base.py)
  [  86.9s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'caikit/core/data_model/base.py', 'content': '# Copyright The Caikit 
Authors\n#\n# Licensed…
  [ 347.9s] 💭 (16615 chars) "In `_DataBaseMetaClass.__new__` (which is the base class for `_DataObjectBaseMetaClass`):

```python
        # Look for ..."
  [ 347.9s] 🔧 run_command (14 lines) python3 - <<'PY'
  [ 348.2s]   → error (exit 0): 
  [ 372.1s] 💭 (1126 chars) "The `AttributeError: 'Derived' object has no attribute '__dict__'` is because 
`_DataBaseMetaClass` sets `__slots__`.

``..."
  [ 372.1s] 📖 read_file (caikit/core/data_model/base.py)
  [ 372.2s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'caikit/core/data_model/base.py', 'content': '        # Return the 
constructed class instan…
  [ 387.1s] 💭 (567 chars) "`_DataBaseMetaClass.parse_proto_descriptor` does `cls.fields = 
tuple(cls._proto_class.DESCRIPTOR.fields_by_name)`.
And i..."
  [ 387.1s] 📖 read_file (caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py)
  [ 387.2s]   ✓ {'status': 'ok', 'filepath': 'caikit/core/data_model/dataobject.py', 'content': '\n    Args:\n        
package:  str\n   …
Native result row
{
  "agent_error": "Agent exceeded session timeout (7.5 min)",
  "duration_seconds": 456.12,
  "error": "Empty agent patch",
  "grade": {
    "error": "Empty agent patch",
    "resolved": false,
    "strict_clean_patch": false,
    "test_exit_code": -1
  },
  "instance_id": "caikit__caikit-233",
  "pass_idx": 0,
  "patch_chars": 0,
  "phase1_seconds": 456.12,
  "repo": "caikit/caikit",
  "request_log_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/requests/caikit__caikit-233__p0__r6.jsonl",
  "resolved": false,
  "rollout_idx": 6,
  "run_key": "caikit__caikit-233__p0__r6",
  "strict_clean_patch": false,
  "tool_calls": 9,
  "total_llm_calls": 9,
  "trace_path": "/kaggle-root/working/r31/rollouts_X/traces/trace_caikit__caikit-233__p0__r6.json"
}